Hate, in the Name of Love

I knew I was in trouble when I looked up the concept “codependency” on Wikipedia this morning and read, “This article has multiple issues.”

I was reminded of an article my wife pointed out to me on MSNBC earlier this week concerning Fred Phelps and his Westboro Baptist Church. My thoughts about religious freedom clash with my outrage over what may be legally classified as a religion. I’ve mentioned Phelps before, but the deeper issue here is whether freedom of religion can truly be free. Westboro is being sued (rightfully, imho) in a case that is going to the Supreme Court. His codependent hatred is causing excessive grief to the father of a soldier killed in Iraq. Phelps claims it is God’s will that he spread his Gospel of Hate.

Reading Frans de Waal’s Our Inner Ape, it quickly becomes apparent that empathy is what makes human society possible. Without our ability to feel for another, nature would lead us on a selfish rampage that would not be satiated until everyone but the alpha male was ruthlessly butchered. This seems to be Phelps’ idea of Heaven. It should be a stark warning sign when apes have better bred manners than a pastor.

Hatred and religion may form a codependent bond. Each feeds off the fear and distrust of the other, striking blindly at anything that is different, challenging, or unclear. Religion does have its noble children – those who in the name of their faith try to make life better for others. If the world were run according to Phelps’ religion, however, I would opt for life on the planet of the apes.

6 thoughts on “Hate, in the Name of Love

  1. Henk van der Gaast

    “I would opt for life on the planet of the apes.”

    It’s not as good as you think it is over here. There is a hell of a lot of nit picking going on!

    Like

  2. Powerful sentance…

    “Hatred and religion may form a codependent bond. Each feeds off the fear and distrust of the other, striking blindly at anything that is different, challenging, or unclear”.

    Wow. Describes some circumstances I have recently been experiencing.

    Ciao.

    Chaz

    Like

    • Steve Wiggins

      Thanks for the comment Chaz.

      I’m sorry that you’ve had to experience something like this. Unfortunately it is not all that uncommon — more than one life has been dashed on the rocks by it!

      Like

  3. Steve… thanks. The experiences of which I speak involve no violence or physical assault. So no need to worry the worst of my circumstance.

    I have simply been left perplexed and disappointed by endless phlosophical arguments and debates by and about people who claim to represent organizations who had their roots in spreading love and tolerance.

    Yet this seems to be the repeating pattern of humanity. Take a grouping of people who out of sincere intent, launch a noble and loving endeavor for the betternemt of others, and invariably it seems, in time they become an insular group with an angry agenda, infighting, and some manner of intolerance… and often hated or judgement.

    A complete full-circle cycle of contradiction.

    Surely, this is nothing new. I suppose it just gets tiresome. Especially when we hold a deep belief, and others who claim to believe (and “represent”) the same harm others with their negativity. Seemingly a complete contradiction.

    Ciao

    Chaz

    Like

  4. Henk van der Gaast

    Follow folk festival committees and their rulings for 15 years. The jack booting gets more prominent as committee members shave and have hair cuts.

    Then their husbands do it too.

    Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.