I’ve tried turning it off, but it sometimes doesn’t work.Every time there’s a system update (about every other hour, now) the new system reloads autocorrect.True, my weary fingers are glad for the help when they just can’t spell hypocoristic, but it does seem that autocorrect, although the results are often funny, has no sense of humor.As a writer I often use ironic misspellings.I sometimes have my irony interpreted as ignorance, but if writers aren’t misunderstood they’re not doing their jobs, I suppose.The thing that gets to me is that those who program autocorrect—although sometimes they’re right—can’t let us express ourselves as we wish.The other day I wrote something witha deliberate misspelling.When I hit the “post” button I realized I’d been autocorrected to a nonsense word in the context.I thought I’d turned autocorrect off.
Now don’t get me wrong—I’m not the world’s greatest speller.Sometimes I use words with the slightly wrong connotation.My choices, however, are generally deliberate.Unless my device has selected them, that is.I suspect that autocorrect is appreciated by those who type on tiny screens.The affluent, I notice, wear iWatches.I wonder if they carry tiny people in their pockets whose thumbs can fly across such minuscule surfaces.“No,” someone told me, “it has voice recognition technology.”I was reminded of some embarrassing mispronunciations I’ve made.In seminary the homiletics professor had an individual session with me.“Given your educational background,” he told me, “you don’t mispronounce many words.”Oh, but I do.I just save them for the most embarrassing situations.
My inner critic’s a pretty active guy for his age.He doesn’t need autocorrect to make me realize how little I know.That’s the thing about technocrats, though.They like to correct us based on the most common combinations of these letters.Sometimes I glance back at something I wrote and find a word I don’t even know replacing something that was, in fact, correctly typed in the first place.I write in a program called Scrivener.My Mac’s too old to run Word, and Pages isn’t bad, but it doesn’t allow for the complex architecture of my thoughts (and I’m no architect; I can’t even spell it).In other words, I have to turn autocorrect off not only on my device, but also in the individual applications I run.But then there are days when verisimilitude just won’t flow the way it should without it.
It’s a little bit worrying.Not just the GOP’s indifference in the face of two mass shootings on the same weekend, but also the fact that the internet knows who I am.I am the reluctant owner of a smartphone.I do like that I have the internet in my pocket, but I’m a touch paranoid that I can be traced to anywhere unless I lose my phone.Even then the government can probably email me and tell me where it is.Don’t get me wrong—I’m not important enough for the government to pay attention to me, but what is really worrisome is that the web knows me.Here’s how I came to learn that.On my home computer I had done a rather obscure Google search.(If you read this blog that won’t surprise you, and no, it wasn’t anything naughty!)When I signed into my work computer—different username, different email address, different IP address—and had to do a work related search, Google auto-suggested the search I did on a different computer over the weekend.
I’m savvy enough to know that Google metrics are all about marketing.The internet wants customer information to predict what they might sell to us.Advertisers pay for that.Assuming that I want to buy underwear and summer dresses online (why?), they tailor their ads to sites I visit.As a sometime fiction writer I go to some sites from which I’m not interested in purchasing anything.(As an aside, old fashioned book research didn’t leave such a “paper trail.”)I’ve gotten used to the idea of my laptop knowing me—it sits on my lap everyday, after all—but the work computer?Does it have to know what I’ve been doing over the weekend?
Artificial intelligence is one thing, but hopping from one login to another feels like being caught in the shower by a stranger.Like everyone else, I appreciate the convenience of devices.When I get up in the morning my laptop’s more sure of who I am than my own sleep-addled brain is.That doesn’t mean my devices really know the essence of who I am.And it certainly doesn’t mean that my work computer has any right to know what I was doing on another device over the weekend.Those who believe machine consciousness is now underway assume that this is a step forward, I suppose.From the perspective of one who’s being stalked by electronic surveillance, however, the view is quite different.Please leave my personal life at the door, as I do when I go to work.
Living in Boston can be a heady trip for a budding academic.Even if you’re across the river from Harvard and MIT, it’s a city known for its education scene.Like many who studied there, I never wanted to leave.A fringe benefit of being a student of religion was that a short trip would take you to Peabody.Why?Peabody was home to CBD—Christian Book Distributors.In their showroom they had rock-bottom prices for something theology students crave—books.That was many years ago now, and over time CBD grew to be the largest distributor of Christian paraphernalia in the country.In my mind they’ll always be associated with happy little trips that ended in armloads of reading.What more could you want?
A story by Emily McFarlan Miller explains why the revered CBD is changing its name. Cannabidiol, a legal derivative of cannabis, is popularly known as cbd.Lots of things share initials, of course, but these are the days of the web, and an internet search for cbd now pushes the distributor (at least the book distributor) off the first page.One thing we all know in this online universe is that you’ve got to be on the first page.CBD’s decision might seem extreme—changing the name of the business to get back on the front page.Despite the amusing aspects to this story, it emphasizes something of an ongoing jeremiad with me: the web has redefined reality.Think about it this way: when a digital image is over-enlarged it pixellates.That’s because it’s composed of minuscule squares of a single color. When brought together in a pattern, they form images we recognize.It their basis, however, they are squares.
The earth, however, is an orb.The natural state of falling liquids—the principle behind the shot tower—is a sphere.Now, spheres together in a closed space leave gaps—just look at a jar of marbles and you’ll see what I mean.That’s the order of the natural world.Reality, if you will.Tech, on the other hand, is pixels.They fill the space better, and if done well can create the illusion of a curved line.They can never, however, fit into a round hole of the same surface area.The world has gone after the convenience of the internet in a small box.It has changed the recording industry, the movie industry, and the publishing industry.And just try to find your way to CBD on it.You might have to change your search parameters.
Those of us with Luddite tendencies prefer to hide them.Tech is the ultimate good, right?You’ve got a smart phone in your pocket or purse and it contains the entire internet and what more could anyone possibly want?Besides an upgrade, that is.I recently misplaced part of the charger for my old iPhone 4S.Yes, a phone that old can still work, no matter what they tell you!I went to the store to replace said part only to find that you had to purchase an upgraded replacement that costs twice as much as the old part did.Why?It had a new type of USB port, in addition to a “traditional” USB.Pardon my ignorance, but I thought the U stood for “Universal.”Now even vocabulary has to change to meet the demands of tech?Whoever the tech god is, s/he is extremely mercurial.
So I was in a meeting the other day.A guy older than me was talking about the future of tech.It occurred to me that guys my age (who didn’t get to take early retirement) are trying to act like those half our age, as if we really understand technology.Growing up with something is the only way, it seems, to adapt to it in any kind of naturalized way.There are kids today, if the internet’s to be believed, who don’t understand that you had to lift the receiver on an old-style telephone before dialing.And if that dial is rotary, well, let’s just say the pizza’s not going to be delivered anytime soon.Those who grew up with the internet and smart phones have a native understanding that people my age lack.I still write ideas down on paper.I prefer DVDs and CDs to streaming.And I believe books should be made of paper.
Changes in the tech world vindicate me.I heard that iTunes is going to be retired.This is after I’ve spent plenty of money downloading songs that I could’ve bought on DVD and have in “hard copy.”Indeed, friends are telling me to back up my MP3 files on some kind of storage device before iTunes goes the way of UltraViolet.And we’re supposed to trust tech.I’ve lost ebooks by switching devices.Some of my tunes have been licensed away because I downloaded them on an older computer.What’s one to do?Buy them again.In a new format.On a platform that will eventually be retired so you’ll need to repeat the purchase a third time.Or you can buy it once in paper or plastic and have it for good.Now there’s a radical idea.If only I had something to write it down on.
I must admit that I received my first “smart phone” with more than a little trepidation.It was going on a decade ago and I didn’t know my app from a hole in the ground.What was this thing that was a telephone and yet so much more?I carry it around with me, nevertheless, and I use it for the very occasional text, for a camera, and when it was younger, as a geocaching device.My sense of distrust came from being a user of personal computers for many years.There would be constant upgrades and renewals and each would cost you something.You don’t buy just a smart phone, you buy a liability.This Luddite screed arises from my attempts to get my boarding pass for my flight yesterday, with a special shout out to United Airlines.
Things change.I’m cool with that.Still, “checking in” for a flight has always meant your ticket was secure.When I went to check in yesterday, for the first time ever United Airlines allowed it only through your smart phone and only via its app.The app is free but my phone is of such an age that the app won’t work with it.I received the confirming text stating I wasn’t checked in.Wasn’t that exactly the same as the status at which I’d started?Why then did I spend half an hour of my Saturday trying to select a seat and telling it I am a vegetarian?(Vegans, it seems, are from another planet.)At least I didn’t have to specify a non-smoking row.I realized as I hung up that I was being shamed for not updating my phone.
You see, capitalism thrives on forcing the purchase of new things.If you wear clothes that are out of style (guilty as charged!) then you aren’t playing by the rules.If your phone is too big or too small (yes, size does matter), or if it flips open instead of being accidentally awakened when slipped out of your pocked, you’re a Luddite.If you can’t afford an update (which no longer fits in the pocket of a guy my size) you deserve to be shamed.You can’t check in.You have to stand in line and proclaim to all, “I didn’t upgrade.”I still use an iPhone 4S.It does what I need it to do.United Airlines doesn’t think so, however.Most of the apps have ceased to work.Now it is once again simply a phone, pretty much back where I’d started.
Does anyone else think that feeding fishmeal to herbivores so that they, in turn can be eaten, is weird?Brian Fagan in his Fishing: How the Sea Fed Civilization describes the long history of eating seafood.In evolutionary terms it makes sense, but so does veganism.One thing that becomes clear from this study, however, is that human civilization simply could not have developed the way that it did without fishing.Food for those performing massive public works came from the abundance of the ocean.Theology played its part too.Roman Catholicism established a habit that still exists of eating fish on Friday.In Catholic areas of this country Friday fish fries, and the occasional fish boil, are cultural icons.As Fagan points out, part of the reasoning behind this was the belief that God gave humans fish to exploit.
We find, interestingly enough, that religious thinking often stands behind tragic results.Although I’m a vegan, I find it distressing that the oceans—so vast in extent—have been depleted by human activity.The main problem, which we’re slow to learn, is that technology has made fishing too efficient.This isn’t some kid with a rod and reel on the bank of a muddy river, but rather the industrial-scale trawling that begins by locating fish schools with sonar.Not only that, but the land habitat to which we bring the fish is also being depleted.I’m probably not the only one who gets the feeling that Fagan’s writing about more than just fish.Where there is abundance, we take it as an invitation to exploit.Tech makes it so easy!
In the early history of humankind, seafood was a necessity.As Fagan shows, it was sometimes reserved for hard times.Now we feed fishmeal to domesticated animals not because it’s what they naturally eat, but because—you guessed it—it’s cheap.I’m still not allowed to give blood because of the Mad Cow Disease scare that rocked Britain when I lived there.In part it was caused by feeding herbivores feed that consisted of meal made from other herbivores.I no longer eat fish.With the world population what it is, and global warming stressing agriculture, it seems we need to be thinking about what’s for dinner.Quite apart from the fact that fish are, despite proclamations of ecclesiastical bodies, animals just like any others, we’ve managed to scour the ocean so thoroughly that recovery may be impossible in some locations.The reason often given is that God gave us the oceans to use.And that kind of thinking always leads to disaster.
As we slide beneath the hegemony of technology, I’m impressed by the redefinition of vocabulary it demands.Because new printing technologies assume, for example, that the XML (one of the many mark-up languages) is primary, directional references in texts are inadequate.An example might help.If you’re a human being reading a book, and the author has discussed something a few pages ago, s/he might write “see above.”Now, it’s not literally above in the sense of being higher up on the same page (but it may be considered literally if the book is closed. And lying face up).The pages you already read are above those where you left the bookmark.I remember the first time I encountered this language; having been raised a literalist (and a naive realist) my eye hovered over the header and I wondered about the accuracy of “see above” or “see below.”The terminology soon became second nature, however, and I knew it wasn’t a literal reference.
In the days of XML (“eXtensible Markup Language,” therefore literally EML), the sense of play is now gone from writing.I’ve heard editors explain to authors that, in an ebook there is no above or below because there are no pages.A time-honored metaphor has been sacrificed on the altar of a tech that sees the world in black-and-white.You can’t point vaguely in the direction from which you’ve just come and say “it’s back there somewhere.”I sense, given all of this, that most copyeditors haven’t written a non-fiction book (for this is mostly an academic affectation).As a human being writing, you get into the flow and you don’t think, “Ah, I mentioned that in paragraph 2749; I’d better say it’s there.”And the reason you need to know the paragraph number is so the ebook can have a hyperlink.The argument itself suffers for XML precision.
As someone who writes both fiction and non, I am bound to look at this from the viewpoint of a human author.I’ve been known to paint and make sketches on occasion.All of these forms of expression have flow in common.At least when they’re good they do. If you want to stop a project cold, just say “Hey, I’m writing!” and watch yourself drop like a cartoon character who’s run off a cliff and just realized it.I’m sorry, I can’t point you to exact where that’s happened.It’s in many vague recollections of many cartoons I watched as a child.If the technomasters aren’t watching I’ll just say, “see above.”