You can’t believe everything you read.That’s one of the first tenets of critical thinking.This whole process is about how to get to the truth, and in a materialistic world that truth can’t involve anything supernatural.These were my thoughts upon finishing Gerald Brittle’s The Devil in Connecticut.Controversy accompanied Ed and Lorraine Warren’s investigations and some of the people involved in these cases have later claimed the extraordinary events didn’t happen.Others claim that the Warrens offered them to make lots of money by selling their stories.The effect of reading a book like this is a blend of skepticism and wonder.Among their fans the Warrens are held in the highest regard.Anyone who begins to look into their work critically ends up frustrated.
So when I put this potboiler down—it is a compelling read—I went to the internet to find out more.Then I realized what I was doing.Using the internet?To find the truth?It’s a vast storehouse of opinion, to be sure, but what with fake news and alternative facts who knows what to believe anymore?I found websites debunking the whole case as a hoax.Others, naturally, claim the events really happened.Both kinds of web pages have the backing of someone in the family involved.It’s a pattern that follows the Warrens’ work.In one of the many books I’ve read about them they claim to have ten books.If my math is right this was number ten.Even that remains open to doubt.
The word “hoax” seems a bit overblown.Dysfunctional, maybe, but hoax?Reading Brittle’s account it’s clear there were some issues in this family.Having grown up in a working class setting, I’m aware such scenarios are extremely common.Accusations were made that this was an attempt to spin gold from straw.The nearly constant stress of blue collar families makes that seem less far-fetched than a stereotypical devil showing up in a modern house because a satanic rock band placed a curse on the family.Lawsuits—the most avaricious of means for determining facts—apparently prevented a movie deal and have even made this book a collector’s item.Somebody, it seems, is making money off the story.As after reading the other nine books, the truly curious are left wondering.My skepticism kicked in early on, but then again, I’ve always liked a good story.
“Common tyrants, and public oppressors, are not intitled to obedience from their subjects.”The words aren’t mine, nor are they from this century.That, however, makes them no less true.Jonathan Mayhew was an eighteenth-century clergyman arguing that Bible’s admonition to obey government officials did not apply to those who abused power.In reading these words I felt a sense of loss in a very basic way.No, I’m not a fan of turning back the clock—it can’t really be done anyway—but when the word of a single book was not disputed those tempted to follow tyrants could be made to justify it with a Good Book that could also be used to refute it.We no longer have a common frame of reference, but tyrants still exist.
Shouting matches have been substituted for discussions because those who support tyrants can’t see how they are also being oppressed.It’s one of the ironies of history.This internet age has only found a way of magnifying people’s differences on the political scale, even as it has brought us to the common marketplace of culture.Who doesn’t use Amazon?Tyranny, by definition, is the arbitrary use of power.One might think of, oh, declaring a national emergency when none exists just to get what one wants.One might think of surrounding oneself with criminals against the nation just to get what one wants.One might think of business practices meant to ruin others just to get what one wants.There seems to be a common theme here and it’s one on which the Bible has a great deal to say.The only Scripture that gets quoted is that which supports tyranny, eh, Mayhew?
When the debate was about the Good Book we were largely all on the same page.Not all colonials wanted to break with King George III.Some profited from the connection.Others thought Holy Writ prevented revolutions rather than inspiring them.Tyrants have always been with us.You’d think that with all the media we have these days that we’d be able to spot one fairly easily.The camera, however, has a way of giving the lie to the Good Book.Anyone can say they read it.Or claim they obey it.Its own test seems to be “by their fruits you will know them.”The words aren’t mine.They’re from a distant century past.But it seems the fruit is dying on the tree, even as spring begins.
There are days when the quote from an author is the best thing to happen to me.You probably know those kinds of days—days when there’s nothing really to stay up for so you go to bed early.Lengthy days when your Muse wins easily any game of hide-and-seek.You see, I save most of my fiction reading for bedtime.If I turn in soon enough I can read quite a bit before falling asleep.Not to sell you a false bill of goods, but that’s not the source of the quote.It actually came to me from an unrelated email about the Bible.The quote, while lengthy, comes from Thomas Hardy:
By the will of God some men are born poetical. Of these some make themselves practical poets, other are made poets by lapse of time who were hardly recognized as such. Particularly has this been the case with the translators of the Bible. They translated into the language of their age; then the years began to corrupt that language as spoken, and to add grey lichen to the translation; until the moderns who use the corrupted tongue marvel at the poetry of the old words. When new they were not more than half so poetical. So that Coverdale, Tyndale, and the rest of them are as ghosts what they never were in the flesh.
This comes from a letter to Professor D. A. Robertson of the University of Chicago, dated to February 1918.Hardy was a known critic of religion, but like most writers of his day he knew the Bible.Now, I’d never generally put myself on the same page with Hardy, but something similar to this thought had occurred to me long before I saw this quote.We treasure ancient writing simply because it has survived.This should be a sobering thought to any of us who try to forge our thoughts into words.We have no way of knowing if, at the time, an author was considered great.Merely the passage of time can make writing unfashionable in its age appear brilliant.Like rocks tumbling over each other at the base of a cataract, they find polish over time.
My particular context for receiving this emailed quote was the King James Version of the Bible.Often considered sacred in that translation, it was not uniformly well received when first published.There had been English Bibles before, and since the Good Book is the foundation of western literature, a new translation commanded attention.It had its critics, but over the centuries the translation itself became holy, whether it deserved it or not.Similarly, Martin Luther’s translation of the Bible helped to codify the German language.We shouldn’t be too quick to dismiss Scripture, not for its theology, but for its immense influence on western thought.As Hardy noted, it may be the passage of time that makes writing great.Even so we might be wise to pay attention.
As someone always interested in origins, I reflect on how I’ve ended up the way I have.I mean, who plans to end up a Bibles editor?In the grand scheme of a universe with a sense of humor, it’s an odd job.I grew up reading the Bible, but lots of people do.Most of them end up with ordinary people jobs.Obviously, working on a doctorate in the field is admittedly strange, but then, my interests have always been to get to the truth.The other day I spotted a book on my shelf—the book that arguably started it all.The Lost Books of the Bible and The Forgotten Books of Eden.These days I would recognize this for what it is, a cheap reprint of a book published quite some time ago (1926 and 1927).No “value added content.”Just a reprint.But why did this book have such influence?
It was the first time I’d realized—and growing up in poverty with parents lacking college educations you have to teach yourself a lot—that there were other books about as old as the Bible.The idea fascinated me.Somehow my fundamentalist upbringing had convinced me the Bible was the first book ever written—after all, its author was God and how much more primordial can you get?Now this particular book (Lost Books of the Bible etc.) contains some apocryphal Gospels.Not having a strong grasp on the concept of canon, I wondered why these books had been excluded, or, to use the title conceit, “lost” and “forgotten.”In college I would learn about the canonical process.I’d hear more about it in seminary.There I would learn that even older sources existed.In the pre-internet days, in a rural town without so much as a public library, how would you find out about such things?
Helmer Ringgren’s Israelite Religion captured my imagination in seminary.Even there, however, nobody on the faculty seemed to know much about what had come before the Bible.Harrell Beck told us of ancient Egypt in our classes, but clearly there were further depths to plumb.I learned about James Pritchard’s Ancient Near Eastern Texts, which I bought at the Harvard Divinity School bookstore.Other texts went back beyond Holy Writ.Just how far would have to wait until the University of Edinburgh.I sometimes wonder if I might’ve taken a different turn here or there had anyone been able to answer my young, unformulated questions about the origins of the Bible and other ancient books.Now we just have to ask the internet.
Lent, among the denominations that observe it, is intended as a time of intense reflection.Beginning on Ash Wednesday the fact of one’s own mortality becomes a foremost consideration as the faithful are reminded that they will die.It has always struck me as paradoxical that St. Patrick’s Day always falls in Lent.Those who abide by the liturgical calendar readily acknowledge that Lent is a punctuated season; saints’ days and feasts can still occur, temporarily disrupting the heavy contemplation.While at Nashotah House we never celebrated St. Patrick beyond a brief mention during a collect of the seventeenth.His day, rich in Celtic mythology, it seems, was inappropriate to the mandated gloom so highly valued by the soul-sick.Having some Irish ancestry, I always felt a little slighted by this aloofness regarding a saint most people can actually name.
College campuses, I later learned, tend to schedule their spring breaks to include Saint Patty’s Day because of the damage drunken students may exact.The stereotypical besotted Irish have become an excuse for excess during Lent, although, I suspect the forty days have little to do with it.A saint becomes a justification for sin, it seems.And Lent continues the morning after.There’ll always be Lent.The tray holding the ashes of last year’s palm branches is never empty.Two once religious observations clash in mid-March of each year.During a brief spell the historically oppressed Irish are celebrities for a day.Such are the vicissitudes of liturgical calendar clearing.
Today many people celebrate a saint they wouldn’t otherwise recognize.One that mythically drove the snakes from the Emerald Isle, and who perhaps hid a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow.A holy man who has made it possible for anyone to be Irish for a day.Leprechauns and clovers are in fashion as the ironic luck of the Irish closes down major thoroughfares for parades in the midst of ashes and dust.Outside there may be snow or budding trees.Perhaps both at once.There’s a richness to these conflicting symbols that belies the commemoration of a missionary with alcohol.The day is part of the complex of equinox holidays, whether intentional or not.The green man of yore begins to awaken as light starts to outstrip darkness for half a year.We’ve had enough of dusk.Anticipate the light.The rules state that Lent will still be here tomorrow.But the light is beginning to grow.
What seems to be lacking in the United States government is any realization that actions have consequences.While in Christchurch, New Zealand at least 49 people have been murdered only for being Muslim, Trump feels that tweeting “heartfelt” condolences somehow exculpates him from fostering an atmosphere of hatred.Indeed, the main shooter in that travesty cited Trump as an inspiration.The sickening lack of awareness that deeds have consequences has once again led to a body count.Meanwhile in these states the Republican Party refuses to condemn the daily and consistent message of racism coming from an edifice that is more and more appropriately called the “White House.”Do you have to pull the trigger to be guilty?History will decide.
Politics has always been a crooked game, but until 2016 most elected to the highest office—God help us, even George W. Bush—realized that the office had responsibility associated with it.It wasn’t a place you could play loose and easy and tweet from the hip and think it was your right as “just another citizen.”Muslims have been part of American culture from very nearly the beginning of this experiment in colonialism.Freedom of religion was one of the pillars of democracy that Trump has been chopping down like a cherry tree while tweeting “No I didn’t.”The GOP applauds.Here’s how to instill one religion as the norm, not considering the consequences. Massacres in the name of Christ don’t make you Christian.Not cutting history class should be a requirement to run for elected office.Or at least taking basic civics.Instead we have a government that refuses to recognize that it can inspire murderers around the globe and then offer heartfelt condolences with no apologies.
Where is the condemnation of racism?Where is the line between black and white?Where is the sense of any culpability for creating and sustaining the warm, moist environment where the bacteria of hatred thrives?When you awake to the news that yet another white supremacist has taken inspiration from an angry white man who has nothing to be angry about and has consecrated murder as patriotism how can you look the world in the eye?Hiding behind a tweet does not bring back the dead.How do we get the message through?Millions of us have repeatedly marched in protest.We flipped one house of congress and we daily sign petitions until our fingers bleed but no response comes from those who won by a mere technicality.If there are indeed ghosts in this world there will be mass immigration and it shall be richly deserved.
Tom Petty must’ve been a commuter.On a winter’s morning after switching to Daylight Saving Time, waiting is the indeed the hardest part.For a bus, that is.In the dark.The saving grace is that humans are rule-makers.Before I even began commuting into New York I’d been instructed in the etiquette.Those who get there first leave some kind of avatar—a briefcase, an umbrella, a lunch box—in their place in line and then sit in their cars.Being the paranoid sort, and also thinking myself tough, I’ve always just stood at my place as the chill wind finds its way down my collar and then buffets me almost off of my feet.With the time-change, however, I decided to do like the commuters do.I walked out to the line of objects to find one widely separated from the others.Being a law-abider, I put my lunch down after the errant water bottle.
“Hey,” a stranger called me on my way back to my car.“Somebody just left that water bottle—you should move your bag up next to the backpack.”Thanking him, I did so.Not only was this person I didn’t know watching me in the dark, but he was also keeping the rules.Indeed, when the bus crested the hill and commuters lined up next to their possessions, the water bottle remained unclaimed.It was still there fourteen hours later when I got off the returning bus.Now, I’m not a big fan of anarchy, but this incident demonstrates just how inclined we are toward civil behavior.There’s no bus stop police force to ensure nobody jumps line.Even at the Port Authority waiting in the queue at the end of the day the rules are mostly self-governing.Those who don’t obey are scolded by their peers and generally comply.
There’s a natural sort of ethic among those who catch the bus before 5 a.m.We’ve all been awake earlier than nature would seem to dictate.We’re in a dark, isolated location outside town.We look out for one another, realizing that any one of us might easily lose our place in line should the rules break down.I was struck by the kindness of this caliginous stranger.Or perhaps it was just his love of order.Had my representation been out of place, other commuters might’ve grown confused.The system might’ve broken down.The last thing anyone wants is chaos before cock-crow.I decided to interpret it as kindness, however, as I made my way back to my car to put on Tom Petty to face the hardest part.