Because of the shortness of time, I recently bought an ebook so that I could get it done under deadline. Although the coronavirus still has book delivery slowed down, things are much improved. There was a book, however, I absolutely needed to read for my current research that is available only in ebook form. Sighing, but emboldened by my recent experience, I began reading it electronically. Shortly after I started my critical faculties kicked in and I began wondering whether the book was fact or fiction. The author has an internet presence but is seldom addressed by scholars. I found myself thinking, “if this was a real book, I’d stop right about now and examine my physical copy for clues.” I’ve done that more than once when it comes to questionable material. Books, you see, come with built-in indicators of their trustworthiness.
The ebook, however, gives you scant information. For example, this one has no copyright page. I may be a publishing geek, but a copyright page is essential for determining what kind of book you’re reading. Then I would, if this were an actual book, close it and look at the back cover. There in the upper left I would look for the BISAC (Book Industry Standards and Communications) code. These are the words that classify the genre and subject of the book for you. It is often a publishing professional, such as the book’s editor, who assigns the BISAC code, so depending on who the publisher is, you have an accurate description. This ebook on my Kindle software has no BISAC code. The publisher itself often tells you something about a volume, but this is a small press without much online information available.
I’m walking you through this because of our current crisis of critical thinking. With a president unwilling to stick to facts and crying out “fake news” when empirically proven realities don’t match his liking, being able to assess our sources is essential. Ebooks have eroded the possibilities. I read esoteric stuff, I admit. The authors had to have convinced a publisher (and don’t get me started on self-published books!) that their project was viable. The book in my hands has a number of ways to assess whether it is accurate or not. The ebook on my lap does not. I’m working on a longer article on this topic. Our ability to think critically includes the necessity of assessing the clues as to the nature of our reading material. Right now I’m reading an ebook stripped of the helpful clues of the print book and fact-checking is limited to Google. The truth may be out there, but if this were a printed book chances are it would be right in my hands.