In the process of unpacking books, it became clear that evolution has been a large part of my life.More sophisticated colleagues might wonder why anyone would be concerned about an issue that biblical scholars long ago dismissed as passé.Genesis 1–11 is a set of myths, many of which have clear parallels in the world of ancient West Asia.Why even bother asking whether creationism has any merit?I pondered this as I unpacked the many books on Genesis I’d bought and read while teaching.Why this intense interest in this particular story?It goes back, no doubt, to the same roots that stop me in my tracks whenever I see a fossil.The reason I pause to think whenever I see a dinosaur represented in a museum or movie.When a “caveman” suggests a rather lowbrow version of Adam and Eve.When I read about the Big Bang.
The fact is evolution was the first solid evidence that the Bible isn’t literally true.That time comes in every intelligent life (at least among those raised reading the Good Book).You realize, with a horrific shock, that what you’d been told all along was a back-filled fabrication that was meant to save the reputation of book written before the advent of science.The Bible, as the study of said book clearly reveals, is not what the Fundamentalists say it is.Although all of modern scientific medicine is based on the fact of evolution, many who benefit from said medicine deny the very truth behind it.Evolution, since 1859, has been the ditch in which Fundies are willing to die.For this reason, perhaps, I took a very early interest in Genesis.
Back in my teaching days it was my intention to write a book on this.I’d read quite a lot on both Genesis and evolution.I read science voraciously.I taught courses on it.I’d carefully preserved childhood books declaring the evils of evolution.To this day Genesis can stop me cold and I will begin to think over the implications.When we teach children that the Bible is a scientific record, we’re doing a disservice to both religion and society.This false thinking can take a lifetime to overcome, and even then doubts will remain.Such is the power of magical thinking.I keep my books on Genesis, although the classroom is rare to me these days.I do it because it is part of my life.And I wonder if it is something I’ll ever be able to outgrow.
Christianity isn’t known for its sense of humor.The same can be said of other religions as well, of course.What else should we expect concerning belief systems that claim eternal consequences?A story by Colin Dwyeron NPR explains that the Haifa Museum of Art had to remove a sculpture titled “McJesus” due to public violence.The sculpture depicts a crucified Ronald McDonald, and a number of althoughs follow: although Haifa is in Israel a large number of Christians protested.Although the practice of crucifixion was uncomfortably common in ancient days it has come to be associated with one particular case.Although the message might be interpreted as a condemnation of commercialism, protestors took it to be aimed at their faith.Perhaps it was.Artists can be notoriously ambiguous in that way.
Ronald McDonald is a liminal, if ubiquitous figure.Instantly recognizable, he has been challenged before as a threat to christendom.I once heard a priest lament that children recognized the golden arches more than the cross.Well, that’s not surprising—we don’t go around telling our kids about crucifixion daily.(Or shouldn’t.)A massive Ronnie, on the other hand, floats down Manhattan every Thanksgiving Day.He’s on posters, commercials, and 42nd Street.He’s the patron saint of branding.With his garish clashing color palette, his red and yellow never mix to orange and they linger in our minds to ensure us that no matter where we might be there’s always cheap, if unhealthy, food nearby.Mr. McDonald has become a religious symbol of capitalism.
Even as a child I noticed the great deal of excitement that accompanied the opening of the local McDonald’s.In a small, corroded corner of the rust belt, families piled into cars to drive to Oil City to see this wonder.It was like an epiphany.Eating out that the poor could afford.Just about everything in downtown Oil City is now closed, but the last time I was there that McDonald’s still stood.Back in Haifa an ironic depiction led to real violence.Angry Christians carrying stones couldn’t see the statue as a condemnation of consumer culture.Their beleaguered religion was at risk.Blood flowed and the art piece was removed and packed off to Finland.Although the point of the display was to question religious appropriation in the support of consumerism, and although that message could ultimately support the teachings of the religion it evokes, the branding came across all wrong.Church is your kind of place…
Photo credit: Napoleon Sarony, via Wikimedia Commons
“We live in an age when unnecessary things are our only necessities.”― Oscar Wilde
In certain kinds of books, epigraphs are popular.In fact, I’m currently reading a book where every part of every chapter begins and ends with an epigram.It starts to taste like an epigram cracker after a while.Don’t get me wrong, every great once in a while there’s a quote that just illustrates your point in a chapter so pithily that you can’t resist. Still, epigraphs ought to come with a warning label.Working in publishing one of the first things I learned is that unlike quotes in the body of a text, an epigraph that’s covered by copyright isn’t considered “fair use.”It’s an ornament, an embellishment.If you want to use one, you need to get permission from the rights holder. (Unless it’s in the public domain.)
While the idea of copyright itself isn’t that complicated—the creator of intellectual property is the owner of said property—copyright laws can be complex.Publishers discourage the use of epigraphs (which only academics seem to use any more) because of permissions complications.You see, when you publish a book (or article) you’re trading your copyright for whatever emoluments the publisher or the journal has to offer.Most publishers, no matter how noble, are businesses.There are costs with producing books.If someone wants to reuse part of a another book—apart from the standard academic quote—they must have permission to do so.Epigraph permissions can really slow a book down.And make it expensive.
Reading is an involved process.We human beings are seldom given such direct access to the interior lives of others.Think about it—books are private thoughts made public.Sometimes writers like to show that others have been thinking along similar lines, especially if what they have to say challenges convention.Thus the epigraph.The quotable quote.But did you have permission to take that?I like poetry.It takes longer to read than prose, but it says so much in so few words.That means using poetry in epigraphs becomes a nightmare.Rights holders often charge by the percentage of the poem used.And once a book becomes e book there no stopping the spread of its epigraphs used so carefully by permission.Indeed, e-books are easily pirated, increasing the concerns of those who sell other’s thoughts for a living.Before sticking that clever quote at the start of your chapter, it’s worth pondering the epigraph above (in the public domain, of course).
When my daughter was in middle and high school, I made an effort to read every book she was assigned for her English classes.This gave us something to talk about during the years when many teens grow laconic and uncommunicative.Some of the books I’d read before, but one frightened me off.Ken Kesey’s One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest pressed the wrong buttons.You have to understand that I saw the movie for a class in college.It disturbed me.Even before encountering H. P. Lovecraft, one of my deepest phobias was insanity.Children of alcoholics sometimes fear those who are out of control, and mental patients had become, in my head, associated with the non-rational behavior of my father that frightened me so.During a clown ministry event we visited the local state hospital for mental patients.I trembled for about a week after we left.
One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest is in many ways a sixties novel.One reflection of that is the fact that the religious imagery in the novel is presented in the form of punishment.Everyone knows the narrative of R. P. McMurphy’s battle of the wills against Nurse Ratched.The latter uses electroshock therapy as punishment and she tries to wear McMurphy down by using it repeatedly after the fight in the shower.The electroshock table is described as a cross.The metal headset is a crown of thorns.Indeed, one of the patients is described as being crucified to the wall of the ward where he hangs throughout the novel.The sixties frequently saw religion—especially the staid, conservative evangelicalism of the 1950s—as a form of punishment.That’s pretty clear here.
Although the novel celebrates the freedom of the sixties, it also reflects the prejudices of the times.The African-American attendees on the ward aren’t portrayed sympathetically.The women—nurses and prostitutes alike—are there for the pleasure of the male patients’ gaze, exemplified in the leering laugh of McMurphy.Still, there’s a kind of catharsis to this tale.The Chief, from whose point-of-view the story’s told, is arguably cured by the antics and special attention McMurphy shows him.Beneath the callous, self-serving conman there is a human decency that “the system” fails to find.Indeed, McMurphy is a kind of Christ figure.A fallen savior, no doubt, but a liberator nonetheless.This was a difficult novel to read.I couldn’t make myself pick it up half-a-decade ago, but I suspect somewhere beneath the surface I’m glad I’ve finally read it.It didn’t cure any of my phobias but it made me think.
When January starts grinding you down you have to find something to hang onto.See, I even ended a sentence with a preposition.January.If I’m not careful I can find myself getting quite depressed, so a bit of self-induced music therapy helps.Although I hate to admit it, I am a bit of a fussy person when it comes to my likes.My music tastes are quite personal and I mourn when a performer I like retires or dies.There’s not a ton of stuff that I enjoy and I don’t listen to music as often as I should.I work from home most days so I could have music on, but I find it hard to read (which is much of my job) with music playing.Like I said, fussy.
The other day—a weekend—I pulled out John Cale’s Paris 1919.John Cale is an underrated member of the Velvet Underground.Okay, with Lou Reed in the lead it’s gonna be tough to stand out.Cale, who suffers from competing with J. J. Cale (who was actually John Cale too; I empathize!), is a very thoughtful lyricist.Despite having been abused by a priest in his youth, he sprinkles his songs with religious references.“Andalucia” is a haunting single with the words “castles and Christians” hanging there for anyone to interpret.And “Hanky Panky Nohow” has an intriguing line about nothing being more frightening than religion at one’s door.There’s something profound here.
I grew up listening to The Velvet Underground & Nico when my older brother played it and the curtain door between our rooms didn’t block any sound.The only performer I could name was Reed.Years later, when the music of my young, virginal ears started in with a longing I couldn’t explain, I bought the album and learned of John Cale.I have to confess that I first encountered his name as the performer of Leonard Cohen’s “Hallelujah” in Shrek.It drove me nuts when ill-informed students used to say it was Rufus Wainwright; yes, he performed it on the CD, but not in the movie.John Cale is one of those somewhat offbeat singers, who, like Nick Cave, salts his songs with images of a Christian upbringing that show a grown man clinging to something to which he somehow can’t fully commit.It makes us who we are and then leaves us wondering.It must be January.
Like a book, life can be divided into chapters.This is perhaps an instance of art following reality, or perhaps it’s the other way around.The episodic nature of life suggests the chapter structure of books.As I was waking up this morning (disappointingly before 4:00 a.m.) I was reflecting on the chapters of my life.As with a book, the most recently read decade is perhaps freshest in one’s mind, but the decades do seem to fall roughly into format.We tend to think of that first decade—childhood—fondly, even if in reality it wasn’t all games and candy.It’s biology’s way of encouraging us toward that weird teen chapter of puberty with its intense emotions and maturing bodies.That chapter is recalled, at least in my experience, as a turmoil involving both good and bad.
The twenties, in my book, were spent in higher education.It was a cerebral chapter.Finishing college and starting grad school.Finishing a masters and discovering employment difficult to find with a master’s degree.In my book marriage was in the twenties chapter, along with a doctorate.The next chapter, the thirties, was spent entirely at Nashotah House.That involved becoming a father as well as a professor.The other faculty were fathers of a different sort.I always thought chapters should show some continuity but the forties chapter was that part of the book known as the crisis.The upending of convention.The self-reinvention.The move.I suppose in terms of a novel that was when it started to get really interesting, but from my perspective life had been plenty interesting enough by that point.
The fifties have been a bit more settled.The publishing chapter.The house-buying move added drama, of course, but otherwise the nine-to-five is like a mind-numbing drug.Mine involved a commute that lead to its own unpublished book, as well as two somewhat academictomes.All of this was going through my head the way thoughts do when you can’t force yourself back to sleep.The paradigm suggests itself to someone who has, in one form or another, been writing for his entire life. Or writing his life.My first attempts at being a novelist began in chapter two.On yellowed paper somewhere in the attic I still have that first handwritten attempt at literary expression.The current chapter has me becoming a gruncle (with a nod to Gravity Falls fans) and wondering how a great niece might read a book written like this.If she will even have an interest.That’s the way of books, as any librarian knows.Maybe some warm milk and a cookie are indicated.
First time home ownership is best left to younger people.And perhaps younger houses.The constant onslaught of things falling apart, or falling off (it has been an extreme weather year) has soured me on the idea.You get set in your ways, you see.The move from apartment to house didn’t come with a raise that would cover all the repairs invisible to a home inspector’s eye.Although our house has stood for over 120 years, the last owners let lots of things go with a lick and a promise and we, the naive middle-aged first-time buyers in a seller’s market, bit.I thought there would be repairs to make, but not all at once.The royalties from books like Holy Horror don’t make even a small dent in the contractor’s fees.We should maybe have bought a house in Jericho instead.One right on the city wall.
The shake-down voyage of a ship reveals the problems, so the theory goes.It stands to reason that people have to go through a shake-down year as well.I’ve got the roofer on speed-dial, and I keep a wary eye on a garage that has more love than actual care poured into it.All I want to do is read and write (which I could do just fine as a renter, thank you) in a place dry and not too cold.The weather, however, has been unforgiving.Rain and more rain.There’s something primal about all this—an element of having to struggle against nature in order to survive.In the modern world we’ve taken for granted our ability to keep the beasts and weather at bay.Storm systems like the one that has just blown through serve to remind our species that there are things that will forever remain beyond our control.
The lament is the most numerous genre of psalm
Something like this was going through my mind as I wrote Weathering the Psalms.(We didn’t own our house at Nashotah House, though.Whose house?Nashotah’s house.)Living in the Midwest gave me a new appreciation for the weather.Some of the storms we witnessed were nothing short of theophanic.Global warming has a way of bringing the weather front and center.Elements of this element, however, are within our control.We understand at least the human-driven elements of global warming.We deny they exist to scrape together a few more pennies at the end of the day.Meanwhile those who buy houses need to do their homework.If need a roofer too, I’ve got one on speed-dial.
All I have to do is say “Old Yellar,” and everyone will know the feeling.Everyone of a certain age, I should add, who’s owned a canine.The love of dog.From where I pass my days I can see out the window into the neighbors’ back yards for four houses over.They all have dogs.Big dogs, mostly.They also have fenced in backyards.One of the things I haven’t seen too much in our neighborhood is dog walking.People let their dogs out to frolic, and do their, ahem, other outdoor activities in the yard.Once a day some member of the family, either with the basic plastic bag or with the specialized, long-handled brush and scooper, slowly surveys the yard to remove any offensive matter so the space may be used for human activities.It’s a level of care that most would shudder to provide for their own species.
Wolves were the earliest domesticated animals.In those hunter-gatherer days either they or humans—the jury’s out on which—realized the advantages of working together.Kind of like we were fated to be partners.Besides, unless the dog turns on us, there’s no question of who’s the master here, and everyone likes to be the boss.When I catch a glimpse of one of the neighborhood pets being scolded, or praised, it’s clear they share emotions with us.The bond is deep.I often wonder about this—they recognize the tone of voice, something that takes humans a while to learn.I grew up with dogs and I found out that even if you insult them in a friendly, encouraging tone of voice they’ll love you for it.Dogs are just that way.
Our first real dog—the one that ended up staying with us his whole life, was a beagle pup we got at a farm.Dogs like to be with others.Unlike humans, they don’t have to pretend.(Although they can do that too, as when they growl at you during a game of tug-o-war.)Then we leave home and go to our places of business, where capitalism reigns.We treat other humans coldly, clinically.“It’s only business,” we’ll parrot, especially if we feel bad about doing what the boss tells us.That’s the way we treat our own species when money’s involved.And we’ll sit at our desks, daydreaming of our dog at home that will be so glad to see us when we walk through that door.And we’ll gladly clean up after our pets what we find obscene even to write in human language. It kind of makes me wonder when I glance out the window while at work.
With a barely concealed chortle the man’s ebullient voice burbled on my answering machine.For a donation right now, he gushed, Republicans would send bricks to Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi to show my (non-existent) support for Trump’s wall.Our government has been shut down for a record period over a temper-tantrum by a man desperate to leave something tangible from his wasted term as president.Apart from the clean-up of the Trumpian incontinence that has befouled this nation, his legacy as the most incompetent holder of the office is likely all that will be left behind in the swamp.With two full years of control of both houses of congress and the White House there has been pitifully little to show.Now the GOP has turned to pranking the citizenry to deflect once again the fact that nothing worthwhile has been done.
Read the wall
Walls, for those who know how to read, don’t work.Republicans have forgotten how their former darling, Ronald Reagan, both gloried in his purported role in knocking down the Berlin Wall and his hatred of the Russians.In a matter of three decades a major political party has excelled only in having outdone Watergate and completely reversing its position on everything that used to define it.Claiming to be the party of Lincoln they nominated and elected a man who publicly supports the klan.Branding has never smelled so cheap.And get off my phone—I’m expecting some important calls.
What the GOP doesn’t seem to understand is that the price of a soul is far more than a long distance call.Building a wall is mere rhetoric reified.It would be an incredible waste of taxpayer’s money.I’ve been paying into the system for 42 years now—others have been paying longer—and I’ve not yet met a rank and file Republican who wants a wall.And yet our government, one of the most powerful in the world, is shut down over it.The 2016 election itself was stolen by a game called the electoral college.We’ve sat two years and watched democracy crumbling.Now that a small check has been introduced we have an unbalanced man insisting on his own way over the will of the nation. There are more important things to buy, for my money.With my money.Acknowledging how government works shouldn’t be a great effort for someone who aspires to be president.If his party has to resort to sending novelty bricks, the wall has already been built.
Musing while munching a bowl of Wheaties, a thought came to me.Not only do we owe the practice of eating breakfast cereal to an evangelical strain of Christianity, but we also encounter the early morning ideas that stay with us through the day. Cereal boxes start our day.Advertisers and marketers know that images are important.If successfully done they stay with us and may influence future purchasing choices.In the case of Wheaties (which I’ve always liked) the box shows some athlete or other, implying that we’ll be champions too if we partake.We are what we wheat.Now, I don’t follow sports.I can tell a football from a basketball, but watching grown men (usually) chasing one about really has no appeal to me.I don’t eat Wheaties to become big and strong.(At my age you don’t want to get bigger.)
As I ponder my fodder, I wonder what it would be like if we put pictures of people reading on our cereal boxes.Would we experience a massive renaissance of literacy if cool people were shown with a book instead of a ball?Don’t get me wrong—I’m all for exercise.I’m a fidgety sort of guy who doesn’t sit still well.I like to get out and jog or walk.I don’t mind doing household repairs.I like to move about.But reading is one of the great rewards I allow myself.When work becomes dull, I look forward to an evening of reading (I tend to do my writing in the morning, before the mental exhaustion of the day kicks in.Wheaties are, after all, a morning food).It’s kind of like living in pre-television times, I suspect.
Among the publishing industry the fate of book reading is a constant topic of discussion.Or, not to put too fine a point on it, book buying.Reading itself is doing fine.If, for example, you are reading this you are probably doing so on a screen but you’re still reading.You don’t have to pay for reading, and it passes the time.No, the crises is getting people to buy books.People like yours truly buy books even when many are available free online.I spend at least eight hours a workday in front of a computer screen, and by the end of it, nervous and twitchy, I need a break.I need a physical book.And maybe a physical constitutional walk.If only my breakfast cereal encouraged others to explore the joys of the literary life—but then, I’ve got to get going; my Wheaties are getting soggy.
There are consequences, it seems, for not paying attention in school.I have no way of knowing, of course, but I suspect most of us are taught that basic fairness is the social ideal.Xenophobia is deeply embedded in the primate psyche, but to those who claim we haven’t evolved, there seems to be no way to convince them that “racial” differences are merely a matter of differing collectives separated by natural borders.Over time traits favorable to the region predominate, and humans therefore have what seems to be a very wide array of potential appearances.There should be nothing in all of this that suggests one group is superior to another.Primate evolution, however, helps to explain but not to excuse.Xenophobia is something from which we can evolve.
Fear is at the heart of any phobia.In a society that measures the worth of individuals by their wealth, fear that another will take it is constant.Perhaps, in a part of our souls we’d rather not acknowledge, we know it’s wrong to have too much while others don’t have enough.It’s very cold this Martin Luther King Jr. Day.In Manhattan on Saturday I saw many people on the street, those who’d met the wrong end of capitalism.I’ve seen human beings shivering in Dickensian conditions in the twenty-first century.I’ve known capable adults who couldn’t find work, even when they’ve tried.We fear the street person.We know that, but for slight shifts in capitalism, that could be us.
Xenophobia has come under threat with globalization.We’ve made travel to remote locations affordable in order to spread capitalism to regions ready to be exploited.And we see nothing wrong with taking from those who can’t prevent us from doing so.Then we wonder why people just like us turn out to march in the cold.Civil rights marches took place half a century ago.Crowds thronged the nation’s capital seeking basic human treatment.Fifty years later over a million women and supporters had to show up to make the same point again.Fair treatment should not be a commodity.Those who have fear the stranger.Those who have don’t wish to share.They claim the name of “Christian” and mock the very tenets upon which that belief system was founded.It’s cold outside today.As we huddle inside, we should have time to think.It is a waste of a national holiday if we don’t at least ponder for a few moments what it is we celebrate.And the real costs of xenophobia.
A funny thing happens to human minds when they’re in a crowd.They begin thinking collectively.We’ve all heard of “mob mentality” and dismiss it as so common that we don’t stop to think how remarkable it is.Maybe we’re afraid to.Yesterday I attended my third Women’s March, this time in New York City again.Being an introvert, I find the prospect of putting myself into a large crowd daunting, and with a winter storm warning posted, worriesabout getting home provided a convenient excuse.My wife knows me well enough, however, to sense when my enochlophobia kicks in and tries to kick out that part of me that’s passionate about social justice.You see, women are still not counted equal citizens in this “land of equality.”The Equal Rights Amendment has never passed.Pay is still based on gender rather than qualification.And we have an unrepentant misogynist in the White House.
Once I’m in a likeminded crowd, supporting social justice, it’s clear that my thinking is influenced by the activity of all those brains around me.Scientists know this happens in nature.Ant colonies, for example, “know” more than a single individual does.Recent studies have even suggested this “hive consciousness” can exist beyond a lifespan, creating an archive of learning that exceeds the lives of an entire generation.If only we could teach Republicans to do that.In any case, being in the crowd of bright, intelligent, hard-working women found me in a good head-space.The men in DC are certainly doing nothing to make the male gender proud.
Although crowd estimation isn’t an exact science, the media has consistently underestimated the sheer numbers of these marches.The National Park Service, on duty in Washington in 2017, estimated 1.3 million had shown up for the march.It’s still not unusual to see the number cited as 500,000.Regardless, with the sister marches it was the largest single-day protest event in U.S. history.We have to keep marching as long as men continue to elect the most ignorant of their gender to high office.There’s nothing controlled about the chaos in the White House.Fake news, alternative facts, a revolving door of staff, and Fox News’ nose so brown you could grown corn on it is not the way to run a democracy.I may have been part of a hive mind for a few hours yesterday, and it was a far better mind than those that abound in the federal government seeking only their own glory. Let’s hope the collective mind outlives this generation.
When winter gets a little dreary with its constant chill and perpetually gray skies, I often think of Edgar Allan Poe. There’s been so much going on lately, however, that I overlooked that today is his birthday until my friend over at Verbomania reminded me of the fact. I’ve posted on Poe many times, but this morning I had an email concerning my work on Nightmares with the Bible stating that my use of Poe in that book was a nice touch. Sometimes I need to be hit over the head with things, though, to make them sink in. It seems impossible that it was 210 years ago that Poe was born. Our Januaries have become remarkably crueler since those times, what with inaugurations and all.
I have often mused that we’ve lived beyond the era where one person can have the widespread impact (for good, that is) that influences an era. In the area of my doctorate, for example, like him or not William Foxwell Albright rearranged the field of Bible and Ancient Near Eastern Studies. Nobody has been able to do it since because, well, Albright already did it. Poe gave us many things—the struggling writer determined to make a living by his pen, the scary short story, detective fiction, the Raven. Those of us who dabble in fiction do so in his shadow. (I know Poe wasn’t the only writer of his era, but it’s his birthday, so let’s celebrate him!) Other writers like H. P. Lovecraft, now a hot commodity, would draw their inspiration from Poe. And from Poe and Lovecraft came the early work of Stephen King.
A winter storm advisory is in effect. Outside it looks bleak and the clouds appear as if they wish to weep. A nation founded by immigrants (my apologies, first nations) has come to believe that it was here first in a world full of need and suffering. Building a silly, expensive, and utterly pointless wall is a telltale sign that the heart has ceased to beat. Two centuries and a decade ago a writer was born. He had penetrating insight into what makes people behave wickedly toward their fellows. Just when things seemed to be making progress we find ourselves prematurely buried under masonry and rubble. How could I have forgotten Poe’s birthday? Too much has been crowding my January, I’m afraid. I don’t take the time I should to gaze out at the winter and wonder.
Fair play, so the adage dictates, includes turnabout.Well, that may be overstating it a bit, but after reading Joe Nickell I decided to give the other side a shot.Guy Lyon Playfair’s account, This House Is Haunted: The Amazing Inside Story of the Enfield Poltergeist, was originally written in the aftermath of the truly bizarre happenings at that location in the late 1970s.My reason for reading the book, as maybe you’ve guessed, is that Ed and Lorraine Warren had a hand in the story.Or at least a finger.The movie The Conjuring 2 was based on the Enfield case and it placed the Warrens front and center in its resolution.This is Hollywood, however, and since I’m working on a book on demons I need to try to dig beneath the surface a bit, into regions where tenure-seeking academics often fear to tread.
Interestingly, the Warrens are not even mentioned in Playfair’s book.The edition I read was updated in 2011.Playfair himself was one of the two primary investigators from the Society for Psychical Research.The other was Maurice Grosse (who features in the movie).Before eyeballs start rolling, it’s worth noting that the Society for Psychical Research is actually a respectable academic association.As Playfair makes clear in his book, many of the members are skeptical and few believed that the evidence gathered by Grosse and Playfair indicated anything paranormal at all.The book isn’t shy about dropping the names of the many investigators who dropped in—some uninvited—to either study or debunk the infamous poltergeist.The incident, however, went on to inspire the movie Poltergeist by giving it free license to change almost all of the details.Of the many investigators the Warrens remain unmentioned.
On this blog I’ve been chronicling the on-going struggle of trying to figure out what Ed and Lorraine Warren were up to.Those who met and interviewed them invariably state that they were/are sincere.They didn’t accept payment for their investigations, and often seem to have been genuinely interested in helping the people plagued by what mainstream science claims simply can’t exist.Nevertheless, they had and have detractors even amid the parapsychology crowd.Playfair’s account is quite interesting.Called in early after the onset of strangeness on Wood Lane, Playfair recorded and recounted what he saw.He caught some trickery and wasn’t shy about pointing it out.At the end of the episode, however, he remained convinced that something unexplained had happened there.Nickell dismisses it all with a sentence or two.In the interest of fair play it would seem only right to hear the other side of the story.
Oxford Biblical Studies Online is a subscription service for institutions that gives access to many biblical studies resources produced by the press.It also features current essays that stand on this side of the paywall, written on contemporary issues.In a shameless self-promoting plug, I’d direct you to this link to see my latest publication.You see, I’m not alone in looking at Bible through the lens of horror.As the acknowledgements to Holy Horror reveal, many conversations were going on that led to that book.While the ideas contained in it are my own, I’m by no means the only one to have noticed that the Good Book makes guest appearances in genre fiction.One of the points I made to my students when I held a teaching post was that the Bible is ubiquitous in our culture, whether we know it or not.Just look at the Republican Party and beg to differ.
The idea is not without precedent.For those who read the Bible real horror isn’t hard to find.The Good Book can be quite a scary book.Consider for just a moment the final installment—Revelation, apart from being full of amazing imagery, is an amazingly violent book.Attack helicopters and atomic bombs may not yet have been invented, but there was no shortage of ways to kill people in the pre-gunpowder world.Revelation paints the world in the throes of horrible suffering and death.Indeed, the completely fictional Left Behind series rejoices in the death of the unrighteous who are, well, left behind.Even today there’s a significant segment of “Christianity” that rejoices in the chaos Trump has unleashed.
In the OBSO article I sketch a brief history of how this came to be.The history could work in the other direction as well.The fact is the Bible and horror have always gone fairly well together.Among genre literature, however, horror is a distinctive category only after the eighteenth century (CE).Early horror novels, under the guise of Gothic fiction, often involve religious elements.Culture was already biblically suffused then.This is a natural outgrowth of a would steeped in violence.Personally, I don’t like gore.I don’t watch horror to get any kind of gross-out fix.My purposes are somewhat different than many viewers, I suspect.What we do all have in common, though, is that we realize horror has something honest to say to us.And it has been saying it to us since from in the beginning.