In the process of unpacking books, it became clear that evolution has been a large part of my life.More sophisticated colleagues might wonder why anyone would be concerned about an issue that biblical scholars long ago dismissed as passé.Genesis 1–11 is a set of myths, many of which have clear parallels in the world of ancient West Asia.Why even bother asking whether creationism has any merit?I pondered this as I unpacked the many books on Genesis I’d bought and read while teaching.Why this intense interest in this particular story?It goes back, no doubt, to the same roots that stop me in my tracks whenever I see a fossil.The reason I pause to think whenever I see a dinosaur represented in a museum or movie.When a “caveman” suggests a rather lowbrow version of Adam and Eve.When I read about the Big Bang.
The fact is evolution was the first solid evidence that the Bible isn’t literally true.That time comes in every intelligent life (at least among those raised reading the Good Book).You realize, with a horrific shock, that what you’d been told all along was a back-filled fabrication that was meant to save the reputation of book written before the advent of science.The Bible, as the study of said book clearly reveals, is not what the Fundamentalists say it is.Although all of modern scientific medicine is based on the fact of evolution, many who benefit from said medicine deny the very truth behind it.Evolution, since 1859, has been the ditch in which Fundies are willing to die.For this reason, perhaps, I took a very early interest in Genesis.
Back in my teaching days it was my intention to write a book on this.I’d read quite a lot on both Genesis and evolution.I read science voraciously.I taught courses on it.I’d carefully preserved childhood books declaring the evils of evolution.To this day Genesis can stop me cold and I will begin to think over the implications.When we teach children that the Bible is a scientific record, we’re doing a disservice to both religion and society.This false thinking can take a lifetime to overcome, and even then doubts will remain.Such is the power of magical thinking.I keep my books on Genesis, although the classroom is rare to me these days.I do it because it is part of my life.And I wonder if it is something I’ll ever be able to outgrow.
Christianity isn’t known for its sense of humor.The same can be said of other religions as well, of course.What else should we expect concerning belief systems that claim eternal consequences?A story by Colin Dwyeron NPR explains that the Haifa Museum of Art had to remove a sculpture titled “McJesus” due to public violence.The sculpture depicts a crucified Ronald McDonald, and a number of althoughs follow: although Haifa is in Israel a large number of Christians protested.Although the practice of crucifixion was uncomfortably common in ancient days it has come to be associated with one particular case.Although the message might be interpreted as a condemnation of commercialism, protestors took it to be aimed at their faith.Perhaps it was.Artists can be notoriously ambiguous in that way.
Ronald McDonald is a liminal, if ubiquitous figure.Instantly recognizable, he has been challenged before as a threat to christendom.I once heard a priest lament that children recognized the golden arches more than the cross.Well, that’s not surprising—we don’t go around telling our kids about crucifixion daily.(Or shouldn’t.)A massive Ronnie, on the other hand, floats down Manhattan every Thanksgiving Day.He’s on posters, commercials, and 42nd Street.He’s the patron saint of branding.With his garish clashing color palette, his red and yellow never mix to orange and they linger in our minds to ensure us that no matter where we might be there’s always cheap, if unhealthy, food nearby.Mr. McDonald has become a religious symbol of capitalism.
Even as a child I noticed the great deal of excitement that accompanied the opening of the local McDonald’s.In a small, corroded corner of the rust belt, families piled into cars to drive to Oil City to see this wonder.It was like an epiphany.Eating out that the poor could afford.Just about everything in downtown Oil City is now closed, but the last time I was there that McDonald’s still stood.Back in Haifa an ironic depiction led to real violence.Angry Christians carrying stones couldn’t see the statue as a condemnation of consumer culture.Their beleaguered religion was at risk.Blood flowed and the art piece was removed and packed off to Finland.Although the point of the display was to question religious appropriation in the support of consumerism, and although that message could ultimately support the teachings of the religion it evokes, the branding came across all wrong.Church is your kind of place…
Photo credit: Napoleon Sarony, via Wikimedia Commons
“We live in an age when unnecessary things are our only necessities.”― Oscar Wilde
In certain kinds of books, epigraphs are popular.In fact, I’m currently reading a book where every part of every chapter begins and ends with an epigram.It starts to taste like an epigram cracker after a while.Don’t get me wrong, every great once in a while there’s a quote that just illustrates your point in a chapter so pithily that you can’t resist. Still, epigraphs ought to come with a warning label.Working in publishing one of the first things I learned is that unlike quotes in the body of a text, an epigraph that’s covered by copyright isn’t considered “fair use.”It’s an ornament, an embellishment.If you want to use one, you need to get permission from the rights holder. (Unless it’s in the public domain.)
While the idea of copyright itself isn’t that complicated—the creator of intellectual property is the owner of said property—copyright laws can be complex.Publishers discourage the use of epigraphs (which only academics seem to use any more) because of permissions complications.You see, when you publish a book (or article) you’re trading your copyright for whatever emoluments the publisher or the journal has to offer.Most publishers, no matter how noble, are businesses.There are costs with producing books.If someone wants to reuse part of a another book—apart from the standard academic quote—they must have permission to do so.Epigraph permissions can really slow a book down.And make it expensive.
Reading is an involved process.We human beings are seldom given such direct access to the interior lives of others.Think about it—books are private thoughts made public.Sometimes writers like to show that others have been thinking along similar lines, especially if what they have to say challenges convention.Thus the epigraph.The quotable quote.But did you have permission to take that?I like poetry.It takes longer to read than prose, but it says so much in so few words.That means using poetry in epigraphs becomes a nightmare.Rights holders often charge by the percentage of the poem used.And once a book becomes e book there no stopping the spread of its epigraphs used so carefully by permission.Indeed, e-books are easily pirated, increasing the concerns of those who sell other’s thoughts for a living.Before sticking that clever quote at the start of your chapter, it’s worth pondering the epigraph above (in the public domain, of course).
When my daughter was in middle and high school, I made an effort to read every book she was assigned for her English classes.This gave us something to talk about during the years when many teens grow laconic and uncommunicative.Some of the books I’d read before, but one frightened me off.Ken Kesey’s One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest pressed the wrong buttons.You have to understand that I saw the movie for a class in college.It disturbed me.Even before encountering H. P. Lovecraft, one of my deepest phobias was insanity.Children of alcoholics sometimes fear those who are out of control, and mental patients had become, in my head, associated with the non-rational behavior of my father that frightened me so.During a clown ministry event we visited the local state hospital for mental patients.I trembled for about a week after we left.
One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest is in many ways a sixties novel.One reflection of that is the fact that the religious imagery in the novel is presented in the form of punishment.Everyone knows the narrative of R. P. McMurphy’s battle of the wills against Nurse Ratched.The latter uses electroshock therapy as punishment and she tries to wear McMurphy down by using it repeatedly after the fight in the shower.The electroshock table is described as a cross.The metal headset is a crown of thorns.Indeed, one of the patients is described as being crucified to the wall of the ward where he hangs throughout the novel.The sixties frequently saw religion—especially the staid, conservative evangelicalism of the 1950s—as a form of punishment.That’s pretty clear here.
Although the novel celebrates the freedom of the sixties, it also reflects the prejudices of the times.The African-American attendees on the ward aren’t portrayed sympathetically.The women—nurses and prostitutes alike—are there for the pleasure of the male patients’ gaze, exemplified in the leering laugh of McMurphy.Still, there’s a kind of catharsis to this tale.The Chief, from whose point-of-view the story’s told, is arguably cured by the antics and special attention McMurphy shows him.Beneath the callous, self-serving conman there is a human decency that “the system” fails to find.Indeed, McMurphy is a kind of Christ figure.A fallen savior, no doubt, but a liberator nonetheless.This was a difficult novel to read.I couldn’t make myself pick it up half-a-decade ago, but I suspect somewhere beneath the surface I’m glad I’ve finally read it.It didn’t cure any of my phobias but it made me think.
When January starts grinding you down you have to find something to hang onto.See, I even ended a sentence with a preposition.January.If I’m not careful I can find myself getting quite depressed, so a bit of self-induced music therapy helps.Although I hate to admit it, I am a bit of a fussy person when it comes to my likes.My music tastes are quite personal and I mourn when a performer I like retires or dies.There’s not a ton of stuff that I enjoy and I don’t listen to music as often as I should.I work from home most days so I could have music on, but I find it hard to read (which is much of my job) with music playing.Like I said, fussy.
The other day—a weekend—I pulled out John Cale’s Paris 1919.John Cale is an underrated member of the Velvet Underground.Okay, with Lou Reed in the lead it’s gonna be tough to stand out.Cale, who suffers from competing with J. J. Cale (who was actually John Cale too; I empathize!), is a very thoughtful lyricist.Despite having been abused by a priest in his youth, he sprinkles his songs with religious references.“Andalucia” is a haunting single with the words “castles and Christians” hanging there for anyone to interpret.And “Hanky Panky Nohow” has an intriguing line about nothing being more frightening than religion at one’s door.There’s something profound here.
I grew up listening to The Velvet Underground & Nico when my older brother played it and the curtain door between our rooms didn’t block any sound.The only performer I could name was Reed.Years later, when the music of my young, virginal ears started in with a longing I couldn’t explain, I bought the album and learned of John Cale.I have to confess that I first encountered his name as the performer of Leonard Cohen’s “Hallelujah” in Shrek.It drove me nuts when ill-informed students used to say it was Rufus Wainwright; yes, he performed it on the CD, but not in the movie.John Cale is one of those somewhat offbeat singers, who, like Nick Cave, salts his songs with images of a Christian upbringing that show a grown man clinging to something to which he somehow can’t fully commit.It makes us who we are and then leaves us wondering.It must be January.
Like a book, life can be divided into chapters.This is perhaps an instance of art following reality, or perhaps it’s the other way around.The episodic nature of life suggests the chapter structure of books.As I was waking up this morning (disappointingly before 4:00 a.m.) I was reflecting on the chapters of my life.As with a book, the most recently read decade is perhaps freshest in one’s mind, but the decades do seem to fall roughly into format.We tend to think of that first decade—childhood—fondly, even if in reality it wasn’t all games and candy.It’s biology’s way of encouraging us toward that weird teen chapter of puberty with its intense emotions and maturing bodies.That chapter is recalled, at least in my experience, as a turmoil involving both good and bad.
The twenties, in my book, were spent in higher education.It was a cerebral chapter.Finishing college and starting grad school.Finishing a masters and discovering employment difficult to find with a master’s degree.In my book marriage was in the twenties chapter, along with a doctorate.The next chapter, the thirties, was spent entirely at Nashotah House.That involved becoming a father as well as a professor.The other faculty were fathers of a different sort.I always thought chapters should show some continuity but the forties chapter was that part of the book known as the crisis.The upending of convention.The self-reinvention.The move.I suppose in terms of a novel that was when it started to get really interesting, but from my perspective life had been plenty interesting enough by that point.
The fifties have been a bit more settled.The publishing chapter.The house-buying move added drama, of course, but otherwise the nine-to-five is like a mind-numbing drug.Mine involved a commute that lead to its own unpublished book, as well as two somewhat academictomes.All of this was going through my head the way thoughts do when you can’t force yourself back to sleep.The paradigm suggests itself to someone who has, in one form or another, been writing for his entire life. Or writing his life.My first attempts at being a novelist began in chapter two.On yellowed paper somewhere in the attic I still have that first handwritten attempt at literary expression.The current chapter has me becoming a gruncle (with a nod to Gravity Falls fans) and wondering how a great niece might read a book written like this.If she will even have an interest.That’s the way of books, as any librarian knows.Maybe some warm milk and a cookie are indicated.
First time home ownership is best left to younger people.And perhaps younger houses.The constant onslaught of things falling apart, or falling off (it has been an extreme weather year) has soured me on the idea.You get set in your ways, you see.The move from apartment to house didn’t come with a raise that would cover all the repairs invisible to a home inspector’s eye.Although our house has stood for over 120 years, the last owners let lots of things go with a lick and a promise and we, the naive middle-aged first-time buyers in a seller’s market, bit.I thought there would be repairs to make, but not all at once.The royalties from books like Holy Horror don’t make even a small dent in the contractor’s fees.We should maybe have bought a house in Jericho instead.One right on the city wall.
The shake-down voyage of a ship reveals the problems, so the theory goes.It stands to reason that people have to go through a shake-down year as well.I’ve got the roofer on speed-dial, and I keep a wary eye on a garage that has more love than actual care poured into it.All I want to do is read and write (which I could do just fine as a renter, thank you) in a place dry and not too cold.The weather, however, has been unforgiving.Rain and more rain.There’s something primal about all this—an element of having to struggle against nature in order to survive.In the modern world we’ve taken for granted our ability to keep the beasts and weather at bay.Storm systems like the one that has just blown through serve to remind our species that there are things that will forever remain beyond our control.
The lament is the most numerous genre of psalm
Something like this was going through my mind as I wrote Weathering the Psalms.(We didn’t own our house at Nashotah House, though.Whose house?Nashotah’s house.)Living in the Midwest gave me a new appreciation for the weather.Some of the storms we witnessed were nothing short of theophanic.Global warming has a way of bringing the weather front and center.Elements of this element, however, are within our control.We understand at least the human-driven elements of global warming.We deny they exist to scrape together a few more pennies at the end of the day.Meanwhile those who buy houses need to do their homework.If need a roofer too, I’ve got one on speed-dial.