One of the iconic moments in all of cinema, known well beyond the confines of sci-fi and horror fans, is the alien bursting out of Executive Officer Kane’s chest.The movie, of course, is Alien.The screenwriter, Dan O’Bannon, was also known for contributing to Star Wars, Total Recall, and Return of the Living Dead.Alien is one of those horror films I was too afraid to watch when it came out in 1979.I was sixteen at the time, and had been primed by commercials that still haunt me.I would eventually, in seminary, see Aliens and prompted by curiosity, eventually went back to watch the original.It has since become one of my favorites, and analysts of genre fiction and religion quite often point to the iconic role of Ridley as worthy of theological mention.Her self-sacrifice in the third installment has been heralded as one of the many cinematic messianic moments.
Science fiction and horror are closely related genres.They can be teased apart in Alien only with extreme finesse.Consider the most famous scene again.Kane, while on the derelict alien vessel on LV-426, has the unfortunate experience of an alien larva sealing itself to his face.The crew of the Nostromo can’t get the creature off—whenever they provoke it, it wraps its tail more tightly around Kane’s throat or leaks acid.Then it falls off and dies.Everyone, not least Kane, is relieved.He joins the rest of the crew for a meal, but then shows signs of distress.Something is eating him from inside.The alien rips out and the line from sci-fi to horror is irrevocably crossed.That unforgettable scene immediately became a classic of the genre.
Dan O’Bannon, the screenwriter, suffered from Crohn’s Disease.He attributed the alien-bursting scene to his own experience with the condition, which eventually took his life.Someone in my family was recently diagnosed with Ulcerative Colitis, a disease similar to Crohn’s.In response I did something I’d never done before; I started a fundraiser on Facebook.The Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation is a non-profit organization funding research into these debilitating illnesses.It offers support to those who suffer with the diseases, the incidence of which is on the rise.I once told my family member about O’Bannon’s use of his own suffering as the inspiration for that cinematic moment.It brought a rare smile in the midst of a flare, a smile with a little too much understanding for a young person.If only Ripley were here to take control of a menace far too human.
Okay, so I wrote a post a couple days ago about evangelicals challenging Trump’s China tariffs because it will raise the price of Bibles.Little did I know that Miriam Adelson wants a “Book of Trump” added to that very Bible.Now, heroes are a personal business; to each their own.Adding someone to the Bible, however, especially when that person has no idea of what Jesus said, is problematic.Biblical and ecclesiastical scholars know that even if most Christians agreed books simply can’t be added to Scripture.Many think the Gospel of Thomas should qualify—it may actually be closer to the words of Jesus than some of the canonical gospels and was putatively written by a disciple.Thomas, however, will never make the cut.Early bishops and elders in the church set pretty firm limits to the New Testament.
Some religious traditions, such as Mormonism, have gotten around this impasse by writing entirely new sacred texts.Loyal Trump followers might indeed fit the description of what used to be called a cult.Thing is, George W., and George H. W., and even Ronald Reagan were more religious than the incumbent and nobody suggested adding them to the Good Book.Our world has somehow flipped upside down in the last three years.All I know is that in the photos of Trump with the most Jesus-like Pope in modern memory the Holy Father wasn’t smiling.Then again, the Pontiff would likely not autograph Bibles if asked to do so.Has anyone suggested a book of George Washington?There’s such a thing as getting carried away.
The Bible, apart from being the sole recognized authoritative text of the world’s largest organized religion, is an iconic text.This means that the Bible is recognized as an important book—perhaps even a stand-in for God—without considering what it actually says.This was a major point behind Holy Horror and it’s essential to understanding American political behavior.Manipulating Scripture for political ends is generally the most cynical of approaches to the Good Book.In America you can drive down highways and see the Bible advertised on billboards.Large segments of an increasingly secular society are still motivated by it.There was a time when it was believed that such cavalier suggestions as that of Ms. Adelson would constitute blasphemy, or would at least profane the founding book of Christianity.In the minds of some Trump has clearly become a god.So it was in Rome before the fall.
Young adult literature gives me hope.The quality, speaking for a guy who grew up in a small town with limited choices, has improved astronomically over the past several years.One of my favorite (adult) novels is Wuthering Heights, and so it’s no surprise that I found Christy Lenzi’s debut novel Stone Field quite engaging.Set in a different time and place, and with a younger readership in mind, it retells the story of forbidden love based on xenophobia.The message has never been more relevant.Although it avoids explicit language, it does include adult situations and features a strong female protagonist in an age of explicit gender inequality.During the chaos leading up to the Civil War, star-crossed lovers are set against one another because prejudice is a most effective poison.
While not a religious story, the iconic Bible plays a large role in it.One of the main characters is a preacher, but even without him Catrina Dickinson’s family and friends are ready to quote the Good Book as unquestioningly as a Republican (with my apologies to fiscally conservative friends untainted by this aberration).This is beyond a realistic portrayal of American life of the 1860s, it reflects the way that many people continue to think of Scripture.Nevertheless, in one crucial episode of the story set in the church at Roubidoux, Missouri, the iconic role of the Bible becomes clear.It is deftly woven throughout the story in a way that might serve as a lesson for modern writers seeking verisimilitude.Many authors fear to address religion, but the Good Book is alive and well in these post-frontier days.
Often the desire to avoid religious motivations leads to stories that lack a key element of the social fabric.In my own attempts at fiction religion is seldom absent.It is the way average people live.Lenzi presents Cat as being aware of but unwilling to be cowed by the Bible.Indeed, as the story unfolds with several tragic events (remember, Wuthering Heights) she demonstrates that Catrina knows but doesn’t accept the strictures of Scripture.The issue of theodicy hangs heavily in the atmosphere of the novel.To me, this makes stories appear more life-like than tales that simply suppose religion doesn’t impact people.When tragedy strikes, many people question what God, or their stand-in for the divine, is doing.Anyone who’s asked “why me?” has directed that question into the world of theodicy, whether intentionally or not.Reading this story while going through a family illness may have drawn this to the surface, but it underscores just how effective it may be for a realism that is otherwise lacking, whether in fact or young adult fiction.
The media is chattering about one of the very many contradictions of evangelicals who support Trump.Since I have a foot in the world of the Bible business, I read with interest how Trump’s tariffs on China will put Bible publishers in a bind.You see, the Good Book is generally sent offshore since printing costs (and technologies) are too expensive to replicate in God’s new chosen nation itself.This lack of divine foresight should be a bit disturbing.The entire evangelical enterprise is based on their reading of Scripture, and the belief that the divine choice of America is behind such momentous events as 45’s election.Maybe we should check our pipes for lead.In any case, Bibles, which are printed cheaply in high volume overseas, are set to become too expensive to give away because of the great pretender’s tariffs.
A few media outlets have picked up this story, including one that noted Trump’s favorite Bible verse is “an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth.”The famous lex talionis statement was famously, well, trumped by Jesus who said that the ideal was to turn the other cheek.In a rather Philistine way, evangelicals have sided with a man who says Jesus was wrong.If you want to check up on me in your Bible you’d better get your wallet out.Ironically from a Republican point of view, tariffs are themselves the breaking of the commandment of free trade.Still the party that claims to believe that does nothing to prevent the sale of their souls, cash on the barrelhead.
Many evangelicals may find the idea of Bibles as a business distasteful.It is, however, extremely profitable for those on the supply end of the deal.Bibles are printed at a volume that would make most authors green, and due to its size the Good Book requires specialized paper most of the time.This is so much the case that Bibles not printed on “Bible paper” just don’t feel like sacred writ.Since costs of living in the United States are quite high, and since this kind of specialized printing would be too expensive in this situation, publishers outsource God’s word.Some publishers have been pleading with the government to exclude books from Trump’s tariff so the Good News can continue to spread.The fact is that only one deity, called Mammon in the Bible, runs this enterprise.And to continue to buy Bibles at the evangelical rate will soon be requiring an act of sacrifice.I guess the lex talionis still applies.
Most people, I suspect, don’t think about diseases until someone they know is afflicted.It’s natural enough to try to avoid thinking of the negative, and I know that I’ve always felt overwhelmed when it came to worthy causes seeking donations.I surprised myself, therefore, but putting up a Facebook fundraiser for the Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation.Someone close to me was diagnosed with the disease, and seeing suffering first-hand has a way of changing your perspective.You want to do whatever you can to help.Instead of feeling completely at the mercy of chance, I put my fundraiser online and I’m hoping for the best.A doctor I know informed me that foundations for diseases are among the most helpful websites for those with the condition.
In my mind, as in that of many others, disease is intricately tied in with theodicy—the problem of innocent suffering in the presence of a God supposed to be good.Theodicy is frequently the first stop on the road to non-belief, as a careful reading of many of the “new atheists” reveals.No theologian has devised a satisfying theodicy.The question always comes down to the fact that a universe without debilitating diseases can be imagined by those of us with feeble human abilities, so why not by an almighty being with no limitations?Human evil can be attributed to free will.Natural evil, such as diseases not keyed to behaviors that lead to them, is a different matter.Often we’re left to our own human devices against conditions we don’t fully understand.
Facebook may not be the best place to post a fundraiser, however, it has a reach far greater than this simple blog, and the Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation page helps to get such fundraisers set up.For all of its problems, Facebook does provide a way to bring people together for common causes.Seeing someone we know suffering is never easy.And there are so many worthy causes out there.The situation naturally reminds me of the book of Job.People who turn to it looking for an answer to why innocent people suffer (Job is presented as perfect in the prologue to the story) come away disappointed.No reason is given and the question of theodicy is left unanswered beyond the claim that human understanding is limited.God may ask how Job has the boldness to question divine action, but there’s no suggestion that he shouldn’t try to find relief with his broken potshard.My Facebook fundraiser is my potshard, I guess, although the larger questions still remain.
Independence Day makes me feel conflicted.Jingoism seems to be an international problem, and although patriotism is deemed next to saintliness, I have my doubts.No nation is perfect *gasp!* and we would all do well to learn from others.America is a nation in love with money and that affair has serious consequences.One is our medical care system.We’re one of the very few (if not only) “advanced” nations without universal medical coverage.In fact, people routinely suffer because they lack insurance or their coverage doesn’t provide for what their physicians think is best.This came home to me while staying with a family member who was hospitalized recently.On the television the GOP was sponsoring ads against universal health care.The irony was thick enough to be sickening.
Highly touted as the most affluent nation in the world, we refuse to take care of our own.How am I supposed to get into the mood for Independence Day?In Britain (as in most other places) they have universal health care.I lived there for three years and knew that I could get treatment without emptying out the bank.Here, in my native country, we have less care.Someone might make a few dollars less, and that, we’re told, is unacceptable.Anyone who’s experienced the illness of a family member knows the old one-two.The treatment itself and the bills that come after.Lately I’ve just been throwing up my hands and opening up my wallet.It’s Independence Day.
Not that I’d expected much to change, but my first inkling of being a writer was winning a state-wide essay contest right here in Pennsylvania.I wrote an essay on “Americanism” back in 1980.It noted the false sense of righteousness that accompanied the notion.I was an evangelical Christian then, but that didn’t mean I wasn’t cynical.In my small town I’d seen John Cougar Mellencamp-level suffering.I saw unemployment, drug use, and desperation.I saw politicians saying everything was great and would be even better if we had more guns.I saw trickle-down economics stemmed at the source.I knew we were being lied to.I did hope that things would get better, but now with the GOP fully behind 45 the true ugliness of jingoism has become clear.It’s Independence Day and I feel sick.I look across the ocean and see the nation from which we declared said independence suffering from a similar backlash.But at least they can afford to go to the doctor.
I once knew a man who was what can only be called a pathological liar.I never knew when he was telling the truth.It was a disorienting experience relating to him because, as a literalist I wanted to believe what others told me.In this case you simply had no solid ground on which to stand.Recently someone else who knew him (he died some time ago) asked me for some information about him.I was at a loss to come up with anything.Since he seemed routinely to mix fiction liberally with fact, I didn’t know where to start.In this post-truth world we now inhabit, I fear this may become much more common.Everyone lies from time to time, but when it is a way of life, well, even Jesus had a name for the “father of lies.”
It’s with a bipartisan sense of sadness that I lament how the Republican Party has completely backed up a man that they know is like this.Intentionally or not, political leaders set the character of nations—just consider how often we think of Russia as Putin or North Korea as Kim Jong-un.America has become the nation of lies.Don’t believe me?Maybe I’m lying.See what I mean?Often I tried to figure out what this man I knew was up to.What was his endgame?I couldn’t be sure I’d ever know, even if he told me.Especially if he told me.You see, I was quite young at the time, and the young often don’t have the experience to get to the truth.And when the truth is bartered for power, well, the father of lies is lurking nearby.
Recently I finished reading M. Scott Peck’s People of the Lie.This person I knew was in my mind quite a bit as I tried to sort out all the psychology being presented.If I’m honest I know that even as a child I said this man was evil.It was clear to me that he wanted to survive on his terms or no terms.To do so, he believed his own lies.Now I don’t know if he lied at work.He had a job where many people depended upon him to carry out his tasks.He seemed to do so conscientiously.When not at work, however, he was back in the land where he felt the most comfortable, the land of untruth.Recently someone again asked me about him.I tried to recollect as much as I could, and like much of the world these days I answered, “I just don’t know.”