Holy Horror, as some are painfully aware, is priced at $45.Even those of us in publishing have lessons we must learn, and one of them is that writing a trade book involves more than just a “friendly narrator” style and non-technical language.It also involves a subject the public finds engaging (or at least what a literary agent thinks the public will find engaging).Holy Horror throws two apparently disparate topics together: horror films and the Bible.The fans of each don’t hang out in the same bars—the fans of the latter, in some circles, don’t go anywhere near bars!My thinking was that this juxtaposition was odd enough to qualify as trade, but I also knew that you have to work your way up to that kind of readership.That’s why I’m on Goodreads, Twitter, and Facebook (followers and friends welcome!).It’s not like I’ve got tons of spare time, but platforms must be built.
Book publishers face a dilemma: they have to sell books, but as I’ve noted before, they must do so profitably.There are people like yours truly who’ll occasionally pay essentially a dollar a page (or at least a two-page spread) for a book that’s essential to their work.As the capitalists grin, it’s “what the market will bear.” I never thought of myself as a market. To me, knowledge is priceless.The effort that it takes to write a book is truly unimaginable to those who haven’t done it.Obstacles exist almost from the inception.Getting the resources you need, unless your employment comes with a free library pass, involves sacrifice.I still look at other books I must read priced at about $45 and groan—how can I justify the expense?It’s a strange club to which to belong.
My mother asked about Weathering the Psalms: “Is it the kind of book you get money for?”In theory, yes.I’ve yet to see any kind of profit from it since the tax forms you need to file for royalties cost more than the actual checks contain.At least it’s not vanity publishing.And you truly learn what it means to rob Peter to pay Paul.It has nothing to do with gentiles.Publishing is the price you pay for following your curiosity.My books are very different from each other, a fact that comes with an invisible price tag that has little to do with money exchanging hands.Well, maybe it does.And maybe it does have something to do with gentiles.Or maybe it’s an appeal to a higher power.In a capitalist nation we all know what that is; herein lies holy horror.
There’s a Ray Bradbury story—I can’t recall the title, but with the Internet that’s just a lame excuse—where explorers on Venus are being driven insane by the constant tapping of rain on their helmets.They try to concentrate on discovery, but the distraction becomes too much for them.Living in Pennsylvania has been a bit like that.I grew up in the state and I knew it rained a lot.Here in the eastern end we’ve hardly since the sun since March.And when you’ve got a leak in your roof that only compounds the problem.If I were weathering the Psalms, mine would be a lament, I’m afraid.You see, the ground’s squishy around here.Mud all over the place.Rivers have been running so high that they’re thinking about changing their courses.And still it rains.
There’s a lesson to be taken away from all this.The fact that we use water for our own ends sometimes masks the fact that it’s extremely powerful.Not tame.The persistence of water to reach the lowest point contributes to erosion of mountains and valleys.Its ease of transport which defines fluidity means that slowly, over time, all obstacles can be erased.It’s a lesson in which we could stand to be schooled from time to time.Rain is an artist, even if it’s making its way through the poorly done roofing job previous occupants put into place.Would we want to live in a world without valleys and pleasant streams?And even raging rivers?
There’s no denying that some of us are impacted by too much cloudiness.When denied the sun it becomes easy to understand why so many ancient people worshipped it.Around here the temperatures have plummeted with this current nor-easter and the heat kicked back on.Still, it’s good to be reminded that mother nature’s in control.Our high officials have decided global warming’s just alright with them, and we’re warned that things will grow much more erratic than this.As I hear the rain tapping on my roof all day long, for days at a time, I think of Bradbury’s Venus.Okay, so the story’s appropriately called “The Long Rain” (I looked it up).Meanwhile tectonic forces beneath our feet are creating new mountains to add to the scene.Nature is indeed an artist, whether or not our species is here to appreciate it.If it is, it might help to bring an umbrella this time around.
I fear I may be transitioning.I may actually be becoming someone who knows something about publishing.Reading about the merger between Cengage and McGraw Hill actually seemed interesting.What’s happening to me?Actually, the largest impact has been the realization that scholars need to become more aware of the world around them.As a doctoral student I was taught to find an unexplored subject and write obscurely on it.Then, when it’s time to publish, to say to the editor that general readers will understand and find it compelling.It took some time, however, even though I frequented Waterstones and Blackwells, to realize that the books they housed were not the kinds of books I’d been taught to write.Back in America, where the brands were Borders and Barnes and Nobel, the same thing applied.People want books they can understand.
Two articles that caught my attention recently addressed the plight of the academic monograph.One was “Worried About the Future of the Monograph? So Are Publishers” from the Chronicle of Higher Education.The other was “Making Monographs Open” from Inside Higher Ed.Both share some common themes: scholars write books so obscure that even academic libraries won’t buy them and since it’s “publish or perish” it becomes the publisher’s problem.Listen, I understand that mentality.Isolated in the woods of Wisconsin with the wind howling through the trees, writing about weather in the Psalms seemed perfectly natural.Forgetting that the average reader doesn’t know Hebrew, I assumed everyone would find my disquisition irresistible.Even back in the early 2000s publishers disagreed.Life is so interesting!There are so many minutiae to explore!If you haven’t had the pleasure of following in the tracks of a thought that won’t let you go, you’ve never been really seduced.But then, somebody’s got to pay for all this.
Scholars are reluctant to acknowledge that publishing is a business.Indeed, higher education is now a business as well.Everything’s a business.To stay solvent publishers have to sell enough books to cover the cost of making them.As these articles point out, that cost isn’t negligible.The scholar who explores the publishing industry (as rare as that may be) will discover plenty of resources to help rethink academic writing.Even without reading the industry rags, just paying attention when you’re in your neighborhood bookstore can be an eye-opening experience.I was looking for a book (hardly even academic) last time I was in Ithaca, New York.If any town is likely to have such books on the shelf, it’s Ithaca.I had to ask and leave empty-handed.There are lots of books out there, colleagues!And if you want to get yours published, it pays to do a little research.Your time will not be wasted.And I fear I’m becoming someone who knows a little about such things.
“Storms are the embodiment of Mother Nature’s flair for the dramatic, and the words that we use to write about them are infused with that drama,”—the words aren’t mine, but they express something I often acknowledge.The quote comes from a Verbomania post about the word “brontide”—a noun for things that sound like distant thunder.Weather-related words are indeed part of the religious vocabulary as well.I wasn’t quite daring enough to suggest it in Weathering the Psalms, but it seems that thunder may be behind most basic religious beliefs.Well, that and bad luck.Think about it—most cultures have a very powerful storm-deity.That power is expressed in thunder.Even in the twenty-first century a sudden clap can made the sophisticated duck and cover.
We don’t know as much about ancient Mesopotamian culture as we’d like to, but it’s pretty clear that storm deities commanded major of respect.Eventually in the city-state of Ugarit, in what is now northern Syria, a god named Hadad (aka “thunderer”) became the patron of the city and was known mainly by his title “lord” (Baal).There may have been more than one lord, but the one in charge of day-to-day affairs was the one who controlled storms.We’ve entered another rainy season around here (something you tend to notice when the roof leaks), and my thoughts often turn to how very much the weather controls us.Interestingly, thunder hasn’t been much in the picture.We’ve lived in our house coming up on a year and I have been awoken by thunder (something that still scares me as much as when I was a kid) only once.Thunder is the approach of gods.
There’s drama about the weather.In fact, fiction writers have long known that one of the most effective ways to suggest the mood of a story is the meteorological method.Weather sets the scene.The sound of distant thunder has a naturally ominous, almost predatory quality.The growling, low and loud bursts from the sky sound so like human expressions of rage that it is only natural that they should be interpreted this way.Since the sky is (or used to be) out of the reach of humans, the sounds from above were from the realm of the divine.When gods approach the mood is threatening.We dare not meet them.That mythology has long informed our perceptions of meteorological phenomenon, acknowledged or not.Brontide is an underused word that brings the drama of both nature and the divine together. It could be a psalm word.
There was quite a windstorm that blew through here yesterday.It reminded me rather forcefully of Weathering the Psalms.Firstly, it blew loudly enough to wake me up a few times in the night.When I finally climbed out of bed, listening to the blustery concussions beating the house, I remembered that the first chapter of Weathering was about the willful wind.That’s not just a poetic phrase—according to the Psalter, the wind does the will of God.Like much of the weather, it’s weaponized by the Bible.Seeing what the wind can do, the reasons for this should be obvious.Hurricanes are tremendous windstorms (although unknown in the land of the Bible), but they are also known for their tremendous rain.Tornadoes, however, are pure wind and are among the most destructive forces on the planet.(Before people came along, anyway.)Wind commands respect.We’re a very long way from taming it.
When thinking of meteorology, it’s easy to forget wind.Rain and snow are pretty obvious.Even desert heat is impossible to ignore.The wind, invisible and powerful, is perhaps the most godlike of weather’s many features.To the ancient way of thought, it was also inexplicable.We understand the earth’s rotation and temperature differentials between water and land and the uneven heating between the surface of the ground and air aloft.The ancients understood it more to be a pure act of God.The wind certainly can seem spiteful.It’s not difficult to attribute agency to it.Such things go through my mind when the howling is loud enough to wake me.
Invisibility suggests power.It wasn’t so much the “monotheism” of Israel that made it distinctive as it was the inability to see its deity.That lack of visual confirmation not only necessitates a kind of faith, but it also veils a threat.We humans tend to be visually focused.We fear the dark.Foggy, misty settings can give a story an atmosphere of foreboding.Placing the divine out of site only enhances supernatural powers.So it is with the wind.As is to be expected, the windstorm has mostly blown itself out by now—moving on to another location until the temperature differentials even out and its howl becomes more of a whimper.It will have done its work, however, for even as it passed through it brought to mind the proper respect for that which cannot be seen.
Are we really happier for instantaneous news?Has the internet brought us paroxysms of ecstasy with the quality of information?Wouldn’t you just rather wait?I don’t think we should go to extremes, or go backward.Samuel Morse, it is said, developed the telegraph in part because he was away from home and only found out about his wife’s death after her burial, for which he could not return in time.More rapid communication was necessary and the telegraph provided the means.No, I’m not suggesting that happiness lies in being uninformed, but perhaps I lingered long enough among the Episcopalians so as to believe in the via media, the middle way.Some of the happiest times of my life have been spent without a screen glowing in my face.There is, however, good stuff here.
One example is blogging.I wish I had more time to read blogs.Verbomania, for example, showcases writing that sparkles.The weekly posts set me up for a good weekend.There are many more that I could name as well—and for me blogging has become a way of life.Marketers call it “platform building” but I think of it as fun.And the practice I get writing this blog daily has made my books much more user-friendly.A family friend with no college education tried to read Weathering the Psalms, with “tried” being the operative word.There’s no comparison with Holy Horror.(Weathering the Psalms was written to be my “tenure book,” and it may well be my last technical monograph.)I have this avocation of blogging to thank for that.
But instantaneous news—does it make us happier?Sometimes perhaps, but often the opposite.It’s a phenomenon I call the internet of unhappiness.(There’s a whole field of study emerging called “the internet of things,” which, no matter how much I ponder I just can’t comprehend.)News, after all, tends to focus on negatives, as if there’s too much happiness in our lives.Just yesterday there were early morning helicopters hovering not far from where I live.Within seconds I could learn of some kind of domestic dispute about which I’d otherwise have been none the wiser.The next few hours I spent occasionally reloading the page for updates.They didn’t make me happy.Add to that the three-ring sideshow that the American government has become and you’ll soon be wanting just three channels from which to select before turning off the TV and going outside for a walk.And when the 1970s start to look like happy times, you go to your closet and start digging for the semaphore flags.
When you’re writing a book, many strands in your mind are weaving their way into what you hope will be whole cloth.Well, at least if you write books the way that I do.In writing Weathering the Psalms, for instance, one of the threads was the question of science and religion.I was teaching at Nashotah House at the time, and I read a lot of science.As I told colleagues at the time, if science is how we know things, shouldn’t what we know of the natural world apply to the Bible?I don’t claim to be the first to ask that question—back in the days of exploration there were many people (mostly the genus “white men” of the “clergy” species) who went to what is now and had used to be Israel, to find out what the world of the Bible was actually like.Their books still make interesting reading.
Quite unexpectedly a colleague, Dalit Rom-Shiloni of Tel Aviv University, told me she’d just ordered my book.She’s leading up a project called the Dictionary of Nature Imagery of the Bible (DNI).Over a decade after my teaching career ended, someone had deemed my work relevant.Dr. Rom-Shiloni recently sent me the link to the project website where there is a video of her interviewing three Israeli scientists about the possibility of lions, leopards, and bears living in Israel.They’re all mentioned in the Bible and no longer exist in the area.The video is on this link and won’t take half an hour of your time.It’s quite interesting.
One of the surprising facts to emerge is that leopards, in small numbers, may still exist in Israel.This assertion is based on lay observation.I contrasted this with the United States where, no matter how often a cougar (aka mountain lion, puma) is spotted in a state where it’s “known” to be extinct, it is claimed to be mistaken observation.A departed friend and mentor of mine once saw a mountain lion in West Virginia.I’d grown up in neighboring Pennsylvania where they are officially extinct, so I wondered if said beasts knew to observe the Mason-Dixon line.The fact is, despite all our best efforts to destroy our environment, animals often find a way to survive.Growing up, one of my cousins in Pennsylvania (now also unfortunately deceased) showed me a puma print in the snow behind his rural house.Now Pennsylvania is a long way from Israel, and this topic is a long way from the DNI, but remember what I just said about how my books are written.Tapestries only make sense from a distance.