It was a self-inflicted double feature.I’d been pondering movies about the weather.Tons of movies have the weather in them, sometimes even as a significant plot element.Few films, however, take the weather as their central thesis.These movies verge on horror as the weather is something much larger than we are and which is deadly.Let’s face it, a film about sunny skies and light breezes doesn’t have much of a hook.I began by watching The Perfect Storm.I’d seen it before, of course.Not much like its book, which is nonfiction, it follows the loss of the sword boat Andrea Gail in the eponymous storm of 1991.Not all members of the crew get a backstory, and since nobody knows what really happened, it was a chance for special effects to drive the story just as massive waves drive the boat.The weather, while central, is seldom commented upon.The characters are motivated by trying to make a living but there’s not enough time to give all six of them adequate stories.Add to that another boat with no backstory and the movie become disjointed and smoky.
The next feature was The Day after Tomorrow.Again, I’d seen it before, but you know how one thing leads to another.Like The Perfect Storm, The Day after Tomorrow introduces more subplots than the movie can handle, even bringing a Russian freighter up Fifth Avenue in order to have a wolf-chase scene that is simply dropped after it’s discovered that wolves can’t climb ladders.Still, the latter story has an environmental message.Aware that human activity does lead to global warming, it tries to picture what would happen if it were speeded up into a matter of weeks rather than years.Nomatter how long it takes, the weather will get you.
As I’ve contended before, the sheer scope of the weather practically makes it divine.Although we live in different climatic zones we’re all tied together under a single, volatile, powerful atmosphere.Early humans realized that their survival depended on the weather.Drought kills as readily as sudden ice ages.The key, it seems, is balance.Nature isn’t kind to species who assert too much dominance.One of the means of nature’s control is the weather.Until the development of meteorology, and even after its first tentative steps, the weather was considered a divine bailiwick.We may proclaim it entirely natural, but it still commands its share of awe and majesty.And it can easily claim a few weekend hours searching the skies for some kind of meaning.
It’s curious the way people find books.I sometimes see them advertised (the way publishers suppose people see them), but far more often I find them more serendipitously.I’m active on Goodreads, and many times a book someone else has reviewed will catch my eye.I like to read things that I notice in independent bookstores.I’m always on the hunt for a bargain.At work we have a used book rack where any volume is half-a-buck.During lunch one day I spied Victor Gischler’s Vampire a Go-Go.Now the title told me this wasn’t exactly a serious novel, but it had vampire in the title and when I write horror it often ends up on the funny side.All in all it seemed like it would be worth the tiny investment, even if I don’t have a clear idea of what go-go really means.
While not laugh-out-loud funny, this is an enjoyable romp through monster land.Kind of like Harry Potter with some adult themes thrown in.The characters—which include ghosts, witches, wizards, a werewolf (sorry lycanthrope), a golem, and a vampire—are likable and strangely believable.An unexpected twist came with the Battle Jesuits, a nice touch that shows yet again how close religion and horror can be.I won’t try to summarize the action here, but I’ll simply note that there are twists and turns aplenty and smiles and splatter along the way.It’s clear that Gischler researched the novel well, bringing interesting texture to the tale.
Like the last novel I read, also acquired in an inexpensive browsing situation, much of the story is set in Prague.My wife and I visited Prague back when it was still in Czechoslovakia, and before it had become a tourist haven.From reading these recent novels, apparently quite a lot has changed there.Of course, in those days I hadn’t tapped into my love of monsters for many years.Working on a doctorate has a way of doing that to you.Now that I’m back, I’m enjoying the variety available in the genre these days.I still have a soft spot for Stephen King novels, and Poe will always remain among my sacred texts, but I’m inclined to read these newer treatments as well.There’s nothing really to scare you in Vampire a Go-Go, but there are remarkably moving moments.And some of the monsters are quite a lot of fun.It would restore my faith in the power of the accidental find, if it ever required resurrection.
Turn about, they say, is fair play.Turin, on the other hand, is a city in Italy.Its claim to fame is a shroud housed there that is believed by many to be Jesus’ burial cloth.Tests have been done over the years, most authoritatively a carbon-dating done by three independent laboratories, with the results suggesting a medieval origin to the cloth itself.In case your chronology is a little hazy, the medieval period comes centuries after the time Jesus lived.Now, some thirty years after the definitive study, some scientists are questioning the results.They’re being skeptical of the skeptics.Turn about.According to a story in The Catholic Register, a Freedom of Information Act request, honored only by one of the three labs (the one at Oxford University) has revealed that the bits of the shroud subjected to analysis were the worst possible parts of the cloth to test.Herein lies the rub: scientists like to poke holes in credulousness—what do you do when your science is itself the subject of skepticism?
The Shroud of Turin, like Donald Trump, is one of those utterly arcane artifacts that unites Catholics and Evangelicals.When I was growing up these two groups were the cats and dogs of the theological world.They united under the umbrella of conservative social causes during the Bush years and have been sleeping together ever since (while both convinced that the other is going straight to Hell when it’s all over).You see, the Shroud is a Catholic possession and allegedly bears wounds that support the Catholic narrative.(The Vatican has never declared it an authentic relic, however.)Evangelicals see it as proof positive that Jesus was resurrected, and so they tend to go further than the Catholics in citing it as proof.We live in odd times when believers successfully out-skeptic the skeptics.
Since the other two laboratories (the University of Arizona and the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology) haven’t released the raw data, the grounds for a conspiracy theory grow fertile.When information is kept secret, that’s a natural enough response.The conspiracy-prone mind asks why the data isn’t being made public.They do have a point.The claims of religion are often hoisted on the petard of “no evidence” and when evidence (such as the lab results) exists but isn’t shown, that suggests somebody’s hiding something.I have no vested interest in the authenticity of the shroud, but we all should have such an interest in getting at the truth.The turnabout in this case, however, was completely unexpected.
I don’t think much about having been born male.I’m starting to realize that that’s because I don’t have to.The same is true of being caucasian, although I’ve always objected to the labels of “white” and “black” as being polarizing and wildly inaccurate.Although I grew up in poverty, my “social markers” put me in a place of privilege, even if others sharing my demographic have locked me out of the club.These thoughts were raised by Mallory O’Meara’s excellent The Lady from the Black Lagoon: Hollywood Monsters and the Lost Legacy of Milicent Patrick.As soon as I saw the book announced, I knew I had to read it.As O’Meara would doubtlessly not find surprising, I had never heard of Milicent Patrick before.I’m not surprised that a woman designed the Creature from the Black Lagoon, however, because woman create memorable monsters (can I get a “Frankenstein”?!).
The reason I don’t think about being male is because the crumbling society built by males assumes that it’s the default.Men have always been shortsighted, I guess.Having been raised by a “single mother” (she was technically not divorced because a male-made religion said it was sinful), I always believed women to be protectors, capable heads of families, and far more empathetic than the men I met.I didn’t realize at the time that we lived so close to the brink because men devalue women.Milicent Patrick grew up in a family where this was much more obvious.A talented artist, she incurred her family’s lasting wrath by going to Hollywood and doing what was then movie makeup work.That she designed the beloved Gill Man makes sense to me.
O’Meara’s book is sure to make thoughtful readers angry.Not at the author, but at the behavior of men.Perhaps due to my unbalanced upbringing, it has taken many years to see what others probably notice much more readily: women have to struggle for that which someone like myself can simply claim.Bud Westmore, Patrick’s boss at Universal, claimed her creation as his own work.There are monsters in this book, and I’ll give you one guess as to their gender.Still, I’m glad to have read it for I know I’ve found another monster fan.O’Meara’s clearly aware of how those of us who admit this odd passion are marginalized in a world that prefers super heroes and those good with finance over those who see monsters everywhere.This is an important book; read it and you’ll see them too.
There are so many of them that it’s difficult to keep up.Movies, I mean.And they can be an expensive habit.As some readers may know, I’ve followed The Conjuring franchise pretty much from the beginning.That particular film was long anticipated (at least in certain circles), but still I waited until it was available for home viewing to see it.I always feel kind of selfish going to the movies on my own since they are a kind of event—a form of social outing.For me, however, horror movies are research, but that hasn’t taken away the thrill of seeing one on the big screen once in a while.The Conjuring branched off into the Annabelle movies, and I caught the latest offering in the latter series in a theater.I hadn’t realized that The Curse of La Llorona had been released a couple months earlier, and that it was being considered part of the diegesis.It was back to the small screen to catch up.
La Llorona is based on a Mexican folktale and is tied to the other films in its universe by a character who recurs from Annabelle, Fr. Perez.He’s not the protagonist, but he does introduce one way in which horror responds to the present insanity we call the US government—the character who defeats the fiend is hispanic.In fact, most of the characters in the film are from hispanic families in Los Angeles.They take down the ghost without the assistance of border guards or any kind of wall.They don’t need the simpering help of the GOP.Like most of the movies in this franchise, however, they do make use of religion.
When Fr. Perez can’t offer immediate help to the family beset by La Llorona (“the weeping woman”), he points them to a local shaman.In this otherwise Catholic world, the truly amazing outcome is that the faith healer does possess the knowledge and ability to stop the evil.While the backstory of the ghost is well known, the nature of the entity is a bit unclear.Most Conjuring films feature a demonic presence, so it’s kind of a relief to have a garden variety ghost for a change.You see, when Ed and Lorraine Warren challenge entities in these movies they do so with religious accoutrements which tend not to fail.Ghosts, however, traditionally don’t require a religious banishment.We’re entering new territory here, of course.And I hadn’t even known about this film until after I’d seen its predecessor.How can you hope to keep up with spirits?It’s a full-time job.
The little free library is a great idea.Just after our move last year we contributed to our local many times as we discovered duplicates in the process of packing.On one such venture, I discovered a book I wanted to read.Not that I’d heard of it before, but any book with “golem” in the title catches my eye.For the first (and so far only) time, I took a book.Jonathan and Jesse Kellerman’s The Golem of Hollywood proved a fairly quick read for being over 600 pages.I believe the industry term is “potboiler,” but it’s also a page-turner.Nevertheless, it made me think.The story follows a hard-bitten Jewish detective in Los Angeles.Struggling with personal issues, he gets assigned to a bizarre homicide case that eventually takes him to Prague and Oxford, and then back to LA to clinch it.And the killer is a golem.(That’s not a spoiler, since it’s right there in the title.)
Parallel to the modern-day crime drama is the retelling of the biblical tale of the first days of humanity outside the Garden of Eden.One of Adam and Eve’s daughters is headstrong and beautiful and when the tragedy between her brothers plays out she eventually takes her revenge on Cain.Although not explicit about it, for violating the mark of Cain she witnesses the horrors that people will visit upon one another and her redemption is to become the soul that animates the golem of Prague.Not your garden variety golem, she can transform into different shapes, and she stays loyal to the family of Rabbi Judah Loew ben Bezalel, the legendary first creator of the golem of Prague.
One of the frequent topics raised on this blog is how the Bible appears in everyday life, often unnoticed.This novel is an example of that.A further point, which is what stands behind my book Holy Horror, is that the Good Book is understood as mediated by popular culture.Even those few biblical scholars who make it into the limelight can’t compete with the myriad representations of Scripture in the entertainment media.Like The Golem of Hollywood, Holy Horror sees the Bible in the context of monsters.Horror is an outsider genre.Despite the many intelligent, thought-provoking exemplars extant, the default among the more refined is to see horror as something base and low.It can also be a lot of fun.Perhaps not great literature, The Golem of Hollywood is entertaining even as it underscores the continuing influence of the Good Book.
I wonder if it’s one of the consequences of success.While writing up some thoughts on The Conjuring diegesis, I got to wondering how accurate the movies’ portrayal of the occult museum of Ed and Lorraine Warren is.The museum set appears in multiple films, and in Annabelle Comes Home it serves up a smorgasbord of horror.Some of these artifacts, such as Annabelle, really do hold places of infamy in the establishment and some are clearly used in the cinematic version to set up spinoffs to keep the franchise alive forever.Curiosity drove me to the open web—website owners of spaces of reputation now distrust this “open web,” what with its money grubbing and lack of peer review—to peruse some actual photos.That’s how I learned the museum is permanently closed.The reason given: zoning issues.(I presume they don’t refer to the Twilight Zone issues.)
That The Conjuring franchise has proven remarkably successful hardly requires footnoting.With The Conjuring 3 due out next year, a total of eight films will have been produced over seven years, currently and it currently stands as the second most profitable horror franchise in history.For anyone wondering why I wrote Holy Horror, such numbers may help explain.Now what of these zoning issues?I wonder if it’s not the number of visitors drawn by the films that have created a problem.(Those with questions aren’t purchasing Holy Horror, that’s for sure!)Since the Warrens have now both passed away, the New England Society of Psychic Research runs the museum and is seeking a new place for it.(We have space in my garage, just sayin’.)And hey, Gettysburg isn’t too long a drive from here!
Success, I suspect, does come with its price tag.People are drawn to those who’ve captured the interest of the big screen, and what with everyone dying death is a growth industry.I suspect part of horror’s appeal is just that.We all have to face it some day and while many run from it screaming some use this opportunity to prepare.But I’ve also got to wonder if it can maintain its level of fear.I recently watched the current iteration of It and found little that was even frightening about it.But then again, clowns have never bothered me that much.The bullies are the scariest thing in the film and Washington DC’s full of them.Talk about success and its consequences.