You can see a lot from 35,000 feet.Alan Parsons Project’s “Eye in the Sky” comes back to me, although I’d never make so bold as to associate myself with Horus.As I’m preparing for my return flight, I wonder what I might see.Not much, I expect, since all the window seats were taken and I’ll be sitting in the middle section.I like to see where I’m going.On the way over, for example, about three hours into the flight, we were over the Grand Banks.I’d just finished Brian Fagan’s Fishing, and the Grand Banks were on my mind.The last land I saw was Cape Cod, although from the monitor I knew we’d passed near Nova Scotia and Newfoundland. In other words, there was nothing but the north Atlantic beneath us.We were hundreds of miles from land.Then I saw it.
Was that an oil platform all the way out here?I didn’t have enough time to wake my napping phone for a picture, but there was clearly a large platform and a nearby tanker.Later I checked and, sure enough, Hibernia, the world’s largest oil platform is smack-dab in the middle of the Grand Banks.A number of thoughts occurred.We’d been flying for hours, and a platform this far out would make a great setting for a horror story.(Okay, so my thoughts move in predictable directions sometimes.)Another thought was this: why are we so dependent on petroleum that we’re all the way out here drilling for a polluting, non-renewable resource?Is it not for profit margin alone?This was an epiphany for me.
I still carry a little cautious hope around in a hidden pocket that there might be some places left for humanity to explore, but not exploit.Fagan mentioned in his book that we’d trawled much of the ocean floor.Although I admiring the engineering that could plant a platform in the stormy Atlantic, I still can’t help but feel a little bit let down that we’ve driven yet another stake into the unexplored world.We really know so little about the oceans (apart from the fact that many creatures that live there can be eaten and otherwise exploited).Our lack of scientific knowledge is addressed by great wells drilled down to draw out pollutants to grease the wheels of capitalism.Yes, I was using fossil fuel in flying.I’d be happy with solar-powered planes, if they existed (they’re above the clouds much of the time, so it would seem worth dreaming about).In the meantime, however, the earth just keeps getting smaller and smaller.Even from 35,000 feet.
Does anyone else think that feeding fishmeal to herbivores so that they, in turn can be eaten, is weird?Brian Fagan in his Fishing: How the Sea Fed Civilization describes the long history of eating seafood.In evolutionary terms it makes sense, but so does veganism.One thing that becomes clear from this study, however, is that human civilization simply could not have developed the way that it did without fishing.Food for those performing massive public works came from the abundance of the ocean.Theology played its part too.Roman Catholicism established a habit that still exists of eating fish on Friday.In Catholic areas of this country Friday fish fries, and the occasional fish boil, are cultural icons.As Fagan points out, part of the reasoning behind this was the belief that God gave humans fish to exploit.
We find, interestingly enough, that religious thinking often stands behind tragic results.Although I’m a vegan, I find it distressing that the oceans—so vast in extent—have been depleted by human activity.The main problem, which we’re slow to learn, is that technology has made fishing too efficient.This isn’t some kid with a rod and reel on the bank of a muddy river, but rather the industrial-scale trawling that begins by locating fish schools with sonar.Not only that, but the land habitat to which we bring the fish is also being depleted.I’m probably not the only one who gets the feeling that Fagan’s writing about more than just fish.Where there is abundance, we take it as an invitation to exploit.Tech makes it so easy!
In the early history of humankind, seafood was a necessity.As Fagan shows, it was sometimes reserved for hard times.Now we feed fishmeal to domesticated animals not because it’s what they naturally eat, but because—you guessed it—it’s cheap.I’m still not allowed to give blood because of the Mad Cow Disease scare that rocked Britain when I lived there.In part it was caused by feeding herbivores feed that consisted of meal made from other herbivores.I no longer eat fish.With the world population what it is, and global warming stressing agriculture, it seems we need to be thinking about what’s for dinner.Quite apart from the fact that fish are, despite proclamations of ecclesiastical bodies, animals just like any others, we’ve managed to scour the ocean so thoroughly that recovery may be impossible in some locations.The reason often given is that God gave us the oceans to use.And that kind of thinking always leads to disaster.
Do you like where you’re living?Planet earth, I mean.Today is World Environment Day.It’s not enough of a holiday to score time off of work, but it is well worth observing nevertheless.More than that, it’s vital.Other holidays tend to be the decaying remains of religiously appointed observances or sops thrown to the Cerberus of patriotism, but World Environment Day impacts every one of us, all of the time.Whether sleeping, waking, working, or playing, it’s in the context of the one planet we have.Even those in space have to check in here to survive.We might try to make World Environment Day an international holiday, but I’m sure we could never all agree to it.Business would collapse if everyone took the same day off, all at the same time.Instead we’re left to dream.
I recently watched The Lego Movie.Although released in 2014 it perfectly anticipated 45 with “President Business.”Overlooking for a moment that Legos represent big business, the film underscored the problem: the only thing hard enough to cut a diamond is another diamond.And the only way to fight business is with business.Perhaps there aren’t enough people to envision what life could be like without the constant stress of having to make more money.It’s a sickness, really.But it’s a pathology we worship.There are some abysses, it seems, into which nobody dares peer.Who doesn’t want to be in charge?And those in charge care nothing for Mother Earth.
We have spent the past two-plus years watching helplessly as the Republican Party has done its level best to lay waste the planet.Rolling back and abolishing environmental initiatives deemed detrimental to “business,” these are folks who need to feel what it’s like to lose a job or two and have to reinvent themselves.Not that long ago, most of the humans on this planet lived on farms or supported those who did.Daily in touch with the planet in a literal way that those who mow with industrial, sit-down lawn helicopters can never be—how can you be in touch when your feet never even meet the ground?—they knew that paying attention to the planet is crucial. But that’ll have to wait.It’s a work day, after all.And a Wednesday, no less.In the middle of the week-long worship at the altar of Mammon.Still, I urge you to take a moment or two today to consider how to save the only planet we’ve got. It’s worth celebrating.
There comes a time, it seems to me, when each generation realizes it’s made a mess of things.Well, at least the thinking members of a generation do.I mentioned a few days ago that I kind of idealize the sixties.The book about them that I mentioned wasn’t shy about showing the misguided aspects of the time.In many respects life is better for many—not for all, and that’s important to remember!—and we’re more connected with better, if too expensive, medicine.More people are finding some kind of enlightenment and realizing that we continue to use up this limited planet far too swiftly.At the moments when such thoughts become oppressive, I recall the young.Perhaps we’ve done something right by gifting ourselves our forward-looking offspring.
A website my wife recently pointed out to me, Sustainable Millennial, is a locus of hope.For too long we’ve bought the lie that anything really is disposable.Bread cast upon the waters comes back, even if you put it on a rocket and send it to space.You see, society has bought into what was a deliberate economic plan—help people find meaning in consuming (the war was over and the economy slowing, we were restless).If you could get people to spend money for things to make themselves happy, well, just ask MC for the results.Problem is you only have room for so much stuff.Better make it “disposable.”Trash heaps never fill up, do they?Heaps become hills and hills become mountains, and all the sudden we need to get Daniel on the phone.
Our young understand something we’re slow to ken.We’ve polluted, used up, and “thrown away” what can never be replaced.The good news is that there are other ways to live.We can reduce waste and even stop paving any space wide enough for a car to squeeze through.All that’s being made is mere money.What we’ve needed is voices not long enough vested in the system to try to change it.By the time you’re middle aged you spend far too much energy trying to figure out how retirement’s supposed to work to have any left over to challenge the system.The young are, and always have been, the future.There are fewer angry white men because they realize that the plan of their forebears for personal gain simply hasn’t worked for the majority of people.Daniel isn’t the only visionary, but even his young companions fade before they started worrying about disbursements and tax consequences.If the young don’t lead we’re lost.
I’d be a hypocrite if I didn’t tell you there may be spoilers below. The book to which I alluded last week—the one made into a movie—was Jeff Vandermeer’s Annihilation. I first saw the book in a Green store in Ithaca, New York. I figured it must have a planet-friendly message if it were being sold at such a venue. I’ve finally had time to read it. There may be spoilers, so if you plan to see the movie, be warned.
Set in a kind of edenic dystopia not far from now, the novel gives none of its characters names. The narrator is the biologist of a four-member team sent into Area X—a region in the south from which no expedition has returned. Clearly intended to be part of a series, the novel does leave quite a few things hanging. Among the many unanswered questions is what has happened here. One of the problems with having Bible-radar is that you can’t overlook references to the Good Book. Without going into too much detail, the story has mysterious writing on the wall. That itself is a biblical trope, of course, but when the biologist discovers notebooks from previous expeditions, she considers that the writing is like something from the Old Testament. This description made me pause and ponder. The Hebrew Bible has, in the popular imagination, been cast in the role of a harbinger of doom and gloom. Granted, there are many passages that have earned that reputation, but on the whole it’s a very mixed bag. Still, in popular culture “Old Testament” means things are going wrong.
While not a horror novel, there are elements of horror here. People transforming into plants and animals, sloughing human skin. And resurrection—how New Testament! This made me think that maybe a penchant for horror isn’t such a strange thing for a guy who spent a decade and a half teaching the Hebrew Bible. My motivation for going in that direction had more to do with my interest in origins, but nevertheless, I also grew up watching monster movies. Maybe, unbeknownst to me, I was bringing the two together in this field of study. It’s difficult to tell at the end of book one what the overall message will be. But since I’m discussing the Hebrew Bible maybe I’ll take a stab at prophecy and predict that the second book of the series will be in my future. And I wouldn’t want to be a hypocrite.
I’m no foodie. That’s not a trendy thing to admit, I know. I’ve never been a good consumer. I think it’s because I don’t like being programmed. One area of life where we are most open to programming is in what we eat. Raised to masticate animal flesh, we’re told that it’s healthy for us, and besides, where on earth are you going to get protein if you don’t eat animals? Without thinking too much about it, we step in line. I remember asking my mother, as a child, what part of the animal “the meat” is. I was kind of hoping, I guess, that it was some part that might be kind of painless to lop off, because I didn’t like to think of the implications otherwise. Even when the answer wasn’t satisfactory, I didn’t change my diet.
Once, when eating with a friend, my host commented that you shouldn’t be allowed to eat meat unless you were willing to kill the animal yourself. He wasn’t advocating vegetarianism—he was serving meat—but he was thinking through the process logically. I became a vegetarian, because of that logical thought process, about 18 years ago. I continued to be programmed, however. Yesterday I attended a vegan lunch. I always thought of vegans as spare, acsetical types, emaciated and gaunt. I learned that they are often people who think through the consequences of our love affair with meat. And other animal “products.” The problem is industrial farming. In a word, the commodification of animal suffering. Those who don’t work in the agri-business—to which most looming environmental disasters can be directly traced—are prevented from seeing the conditions in which their “food” is being kept. Animal cruelty on a scale that is, well, industrial. Decisions are made based on one metric—profits.
I don’t think about food a lot. It has become clear to me that my friend’s logic works. One of the things our vegan presenter pointed out is that pigs are considered the fourth most intelligent animal species. Our love of bacon has them kept in conditions where they literally lose their minds. We don’t see it, so we continue to be programmed. Go to the grocery store. The healthy foods are more expensive—“consumers” are punished for refusing to play the “no thinking” game. I don’t know much, but I do know that it’s often the things I do without thinking that ultimately lead to trouble. Capitalism rewards the greedy only. The rest of us, including our animals, pay the price. Think it through and consider the conclusions. I don’t like being programmed.
I’ve never thought of bugs as an ethical concern. Well, not directly anyway. I had some truly frightening encounters with insects and arachnids as a child, so I tended to avoid bugs when I could. At times, I hesitate to admit, I took advantage of my size and smooched them. I did, however, mature out of that. Many years ago I stopped killing bugs that got inside, choosing instead to favor capture and release. I’d trap them in one of a variety of empty peanut-butter jars we kept around the house expressly for that purpose. The imprisoned intruder is then escorted outside and released. It seemed the only fair way to handle the situation—I don’t believe in exploiting size, and hating things with too many legs is prejudicial. Then I heard that insects are dying out.
Public domain, from Wikimedia Commons
Instead of bringing glee, this instilled a kind of panic. According to a story in the Washington Post, scientists have noted a 75% drop in bug biomass over the past several years. Stop and think about that. Insects contribute so much to our lives that we barely pay them any mind. Everything from pollination to breaking down decomposing organic matter, bugs do it. We need our insects. As with most things these days, it seems that we humans are the likely culprits. We destroy habitat, we spread pesticides everywhere, we try to take all kinds of land and make it in our own image. And we’ve sacrificed our insects along the way. As the article states—driving around country lanes on a summer night doesn’t bring up the windshield splatter that it used to. I stopped to think about that. It seems to be true.
The tiny members of the animal kingdom do a tremendous amount of work. I know they’re not doing it for us, but the things they do we don’t have to—and oftentimes can’t—do. All fruits and vegetables are pollinated by insects. Honey has been the main place where some of this shortage has been felt most directly. Bees have been disappearing. So have monarch butterflies. The fact is, we can’t live in a world without bugs. This does make it an ethical issue. If we’re going to claim dominion over all things we have no right to overlook the smallest creatures. Sure, they can, well, bug you. They fly in your face or bite you while you’re sleeping. They’re only doing what they evolved to do. I don’t mean to bug you about it, but we need to look after the minuscule and vulnerable among us.