I’m not lying when I say untruth has been on my mind a lot.A few days ago I posted on freedom of speech and how it’s an ideal rather than an actuality.What with lies being lobbed at us daily, I got to thinking about the ethical implications for honesty.Integrity.The freedom to state what we actually think is something a little different.How often in daily life do we act authentically?And when we’re with others we act differently than when we’re alone.Which is truly us?Someone pointed out to me recently that if you walk with someone your body language is different than if you walk alone.Even walking alone your body language shows your interior frame of mind.A sad walk isn’t the same as a happy walk.
As social creatures, the ideal of being forthright all of the time would lead to chaos.All of us lie, one way or another, at times.That’s where integrity comes in.Integrity, it seems to me, indicates someone who is honest, all things being equal.I once noticed a politician who blinked every time he said the word “God.”That blink, I believe, was a form of “scare quote.”I don’t know, but I suspect said politician didn’t have any strong belief in a deity.Some circumstances require that you pay lip service anyway.Ethics dictates that we try to be honest, but even keeping secrets is a kind of lie of omission.Our own personal wants—which are honest—often have to be suppressed for the sake of fairness.Again, we live in a situation where the most powerful pursue their own desires while neglecting the needs of others.Is this then integrity?
Often I ponder what it means to be social creatures.Some of us are naturally introverts.We nevertheless rely on others because society is too complex.What any one person could build an iPhone single-handedly, and then set up the 3G, 4G, or 5G network on which to use it?Could that same person grow their own food, manufacture their own automobile, and construct their own house?The self-made rugged individualist is a myth we cherish, but it too is an untruth.We rely heavily on others and we count on those closest to us to be honest.When lying becomes a lifestyle integrity lies in tatters on the floor.Just three years ago I wouldn’t have been having such thoughts, if I’m honest with myself.
So, maybe it’s the crazy wind that was blowing around here all day yesterday, but I’m beginning to wonder about corporate sanity (if there is such a thing).Specifically, I’ve been hearing about more and more contracts with ethics clauses written into them.This is downright weird.Does the signing of a contract make one ethical?It’s like that silly page that comes up on some workplace servers saying you’re very naughty if you’re not the person you’ve logged in as.We all know that.That’s why hackers hack and the rest of us comply.But legislative morality?Via contract?The notion is strange because ethics relies on an agreed-upon set of standards.If Trump has taught us anything it’s that there’s no agreed-upon set of standards.Some of us can honestly say that we weigh our own ethics every time we do anything.Send me a contract and see!
The first time I saw an ethical behavior clause it was in a contract from a Christian company.They wanted no business dealings with the corrupt, misbehaving, and one might guess, pagan sort.When such a contract is sent to a business, it means that said business will monitor the morality of all its employees.That’s something I certainly wouldn’t want to be in charge of.Rationalization is too easy and far too human.Let the one without sin cast the first whereas.Well, one would think that a Christian company might take that point of view.The way some Christians have treated me over the years makes me shudder at the advantages taken.
This idea seems to be spreading out to secular companies as well.You read about contracts with ethical clauses in them—anyone who’s not ethical will have no qualms about signing a contract stating s/he is!Why offer a contract at all if someone’s morals are in doubt?One of the things you learn from taking ethics courses (of which I had several) is that, beyond widely agreed-upon standards (it’s wrong to kill, for example, or take something that belongs to someone else) the details quickly fade to gray.People find ways of living with themselves while trying to survive in society.An ethics clause in a contract suggests I should live by the standards set by the issuer.It attempts to vouch for my future behavior without knowing my future circumstances.I’m all for ethical behavior, and I try to abide by my own moral code daily.It’s just that putting morality into contracts implies thinking poorly of the party of the second part.Better to add a sanity clause.
I was searching for someone on the internet (surprisingly, not myself).Since this individual didn’t have much of a platform, I looked at MyLife.com.Such sites draw in the curious and you soon end up paying (I suspect) for any salacious information such as arrest or court records.In any case, what stood out is that we all presumably have a meter on the site that shows whether we’re good or bad.It’s like a Leonard Cohen song.Call me old-fashioned, but that’s what religion used to do.Some forms of Christianity (Calvinism comes to mind) tell you that you can never be good enough.Others are more lax (Episcopalians come to mind), as long as you go to mass enough and feel some guilt for misdeeds, you’ll get in.All the various groups, however, have metrics by which you’re measured, largely based on what you believe.
The odd thing—or one of the odd things—about religion is that it is now categorized as what you believe.Historically religions began as a kind of bellwether of what you do rather than what you believe.The two are related, of course.The motivation behind an action might well be good while the end result is less so.Secular justice regularly seeks to answer the question of why someone did something.Was there malice involved?Aforethought?Was it an unfortunate accident?Religion drives over this ground too.Without getting into the many shades of gray that are morality, value judgments as to the goodness or badness of an action (or a person) were traditionally the purview of religion.
The internet itself has become a kind of god.We turn to it for all kinds of answers.It’s both a Bible and encyclopedia rolled into one.When we want to know something about someone we google them.Some of us have tried to control the narrative about ourselves by making websites.(This, of course, presumes others will be interested in us.)Social media also injects us into larger arteries of traffic.People judge us by what we post or tweet.Often without ever meeting us or getting to know who we really are behind our physical walls.So this person I searched had left little to find.Scraps here and there.I didn’t believe everything I saw on MyLife.After all, not everyone wants to subject her or himself to the constant scrutiny of the connected world.Maybe it’s a religious thing.
It came to me vividly when I heard a speaker self-deferentially say he was crazy.This was, I suspect, a way of defusing the fact that when vegans speak others often think they’re being judgmental or preachy.I’m pretty sure this speaker wasn’t, and I try my best not to be.It can be difficult when you’re passionate about something.At the event, which included several people in age brackets more advanced than even mine, the question of “why” was predictably raised.Apart from the rampant cruelty of industrial farming—some states even have laws preventing people from knowing what actually goes on in such places—there are other considerations.One of them involves Greta Thunberg, Time magazine’s person of the year.
Global warming is no joke, no matter how much the Republican Church laughs it off.Greta Thunberg has become the face of a generation with a conscience, but one fact few wish to know is that industrial farming is by far the largest environmental threat to our planet.The amount of pollution it causes is staggering.The rain forests are being cleared for grazing land because people will buy beef.The largest methane emissions come from farms, not factories.Our lifestyle of eating animals on an industrial scale is one of the many hidden costs to the modern way of living.Or of dying. There are doubters, to be sure.It’s pretty clear, however, that the agriculture business is massive and it is just as powerful as the other great offender—the petroleum industry.
Making facts known isn’t being judgmental.People’s eating choices are up to them.I’ve only been a vegan for about two years now and I sometimes can’t comply with my own ethical standards when I go out to eat.Or when other people give food.Many places have no concept of dining without animal products.I’m not trying to make everyone else accept my standards; I have beliefs about animals that are based both on personal experience and lots of reading about faunal consciousness.I fully accept that many others don’t agree.What I do hope, however, is that people like the speaker I recently heard will not have to jokingly call themselves crazy because they’re vegan.The narrative must change.We must be willing to look at the way we live on this planet, and accept the fact that just because major polluting industries hide behind large, brown cow eyes doesn’t mean we shouldn’t question what they feed us.We need to look at our plates and count the cost.
Why not try Veg Out, Bethlehem’s new vegan restaurant, if you’re in the Valley?
O great—just what I need right now.I knew lawn care would soon become a necessary avocation after buying a house, but this I did not expect.Over the weekend I found myself pulling up dandelions that were growing out of cracks in the front steps.Since we compost, I laid them out on a slab, figuring when they dried out I could make them into more soil.(From which more dandelions will grow, I know, but still it just feels right.)I came back a day later to find that the dandelions had returned to the vertical position.Zombie dandelions!They apparently couldn’t stay dead.Now, I’ve been writing about demons for the past several months and I’d forgotten about zombies.Well, I did post about resurrection on Easter, but my short-lived digression left me unprepared for this.
Really, the persistence of life is a sign of hope.Perhaps dead zones, such as morality in Washington DC, will someday come back to life.There’s hope for a tree, Job tells us, even if cut down.These dandelions were a message for me.Don’t give up.Prior to religion being hijacked by theology it was a system intended to make life better for people.Human beings were more important than heretical thoughts.You help those who need it, regardless of what they believe.Or don’t believe.That was the point behind resurrection, I suspect—we can rise above all this dirt in which we find ourselves.There’s a nobility to it.Then again, fear trumps hope just about every time.The dandelions are rising and we have no hope of outnumbering them.
The ancients feared the dead coming back.It’s a primal phobia.All those things we buried with tears we hoped would stay the way we left them.Life, as Malcolm says, will find a way.Politicians, it seems, will find a way around it.Call it executive privilege or whatever you will, the end result is the same.The yellow-headed fuzzies will threaten you even when uprooted and left to dry in the sun.Now, our lawn isn’t pretty.Grasses of different varieties contend with weeds I’ve never seen before for scarce resources.I’ve never minded dandelions.They don’t ask much, only they now seem to be demanding the right to come back from the compost.And if we let that happen, all hope is lost.
Amazon, probably not purely out of kindness, gives some customers access to the most read stories in the Washington Post. Apart from talking to my wife, this is about the only way I learn about what’s happening in the world (mine is a small world after all). I have no idea what Amazon’s metrics are for determining which stories to share, but I was amazed at one focusing on doctors in Canada. The story also appeared in Newsweek and other media sources. Unlike many medical professionals, these Canadian physicians are petitioning the government for lower salaries. They say they already have enough money and other healthcare workers aren’t being paid adequately. Why not share when you have extra? I’ve always thought Canada was far ahead of its southern neighbor in the ethics department, and this about clinches it.
Don’t get me wrong—I’m grateful for doctors. (You should see how much money I give them!) Nobody wants to go through life with this or that hurting or aching all the time. Most of the doctors I’ve met have been kind and descent people. Seldom as strapped for cash as I am, but then my doctorate is in a more intellectual field; serves me right. What really becomes a star in my personal firmament is that somewhere in this world enamored of capitalism, a privileged class has said, “this isn’t right.” Economists have been warning us for years that unbridled capitalism isn’t sustainable, but that falls on deaf ears in this country. Maybe our political leaders should see an otolaryngologist? Maybe they’ve got some wax build-up in there.
Doctors work hard. They have long hours and have to put up with smelly and messy situations. There’s a reason we have to pay so much to compel them to look where the rest of us are told to avert our eyes. At the same time, every other major developed nation in the world has some form of socialized medicine—it is a basic human right. Everywhere but here. If you drive through New Jersey you can’t help but be taken by the palatial campuses of the pharmaceutical companies that call this state home. There’s gold in them thar hills. As I gaze at them from the highway, my thoughts are driving across the border to a land that’s both affluent and caring. When’s the last time we heard an American entrepreneur say, “I’ve got enough—give the rest to someone else”? When too much is never enough, that’s something it’s going to take a Canadian doctor to treat, I fear.
“You’re not in control on a bus” my friend Marvin once wrote, in his short story “O Driver.” The commuter is the consummate captive. I don’t like to beat dead horses—we might need all the horses we can get before this is all done—but some commuters need to learn silence is golden. I take a very early bus with some hope that we might beat the inevitable traffic jams coming into New York in the morning. Every minute counts. Some people, however, feel compelled to comment when they think the bus is early. They’re already sitting on the bus, so what’s the problem? There’s another coming in 30 minutes and those of us concerned with getting in before the traffic make a point of being at the bus stop, well, early. The other day a guy got in at the stop after mine. He told the driver that the bus was running early (it actually wasn’t) but the driver obligingly sat for several minutes. The commuter’s always right, right? We got into the Port Authority late that morning. All because of one man’s mouth and his inability to keep it shut. I wonder why they even have that sign saying not to talk to the driver. That only applies when the bus is in motion. So…
The very next day the driver on the route was new. She was on time. Until. To understand this, you need to know my route is an express—it is entirely highway except for one short jog into another town about 10 miles down the road. My driver was doing great. “You missed the turn,” another passenger said. The driver apologized. A three-point-turn in a bus just isn’t possible on the highway, so she had to drive to an exit, wait for the light, and turn around. We were now speeding west, heading to New York City. The passenger, now acting as GPS, didn’t know this area very well. “Take the next exit,” she instructed. The driver dutifully did. It was a ramp with no reentry to the highway. We were touring rural New Jersey for some time before the driver found a place to make another U-turn. “Missing the turn,” the passenger now said, “That turn’s inconsequential. There’s another bus that comes just after this one.” She’s right. No less than three routes into New York follow that jog. But it was too late for us now. Finding our way to the highway, we again headed west. This time our driver took the correct exit, apologizing all the way. The next day we had a new driver.
Actions have consequences. For each and every action there’s an equal and opposite reaction. I learned the latter in physics class. The former is a life lesson that might properly be called the mother of morality. When you talk on the bus you’re taking charge of about fifty lives. It has become clear to me through my years of commuting that most people shouldn’t have that kind of power.