“I just saw God up on your ridge.”(Kudos to anyone who can name the source of that quote!)Many years ago I read Stewart Guthrie’s remarkable Faces in the Clouds.The idea that he presents is that pareidolia—seeing faces or people where they don’t actually exist—may account for the belief in God.Early people, not knowing any way to interpret such obvious examples of humans writ everywhere thought they were gods or spirits.Since reading this book, I’ve taken to trying to capture incidents of pareidolia where I can.The other day as I was working away in my home office, I noticed a literal face in the clouds.I thought “I just saw God outside my window.”
Now I know this isn’t really what I saw.I know matrixing (mistaking noise for signal) when I experience it.I hope.Nevertheless, the resemblance was detailed—brow ridge, nose, distinct lips, chin.The lighting in the fair weather cumulus will likely make this difficult for you to make out, and you might see a face other than the one I saw.Not everyone thinks of the Almighty in the same way.Looking at the picture I snapped I can see at least two faces stacked on top of one another—the council of the gods?Who am I to tell deities what they can or can’t do? Or to prevent imagination from going where it will?Religion seems to be an evolved characteristic of our biological makeup—our eyes show us what to believe about the world around us.The rest is hermeneutics.
Gods and the skies naturally go together.We can’t reach the heavens nor can we control them.We can increase greenhouse gases in them, though, threatening the very illusion we see in the clouds.The glimpse of the divine we once saw there can easily dissolve into acid rain.Heaven and Hell, according to the story of Dives and Lazarus, aren’t very far apart.Even as we gaze into the cerulean sky seeking serenity, others are bending laws to allow them to destroy it for profit.There’s a reason Dives is simply called “the rich man.”Does Scripture defend the practice of environmental destruction?Dives’ friends claim the planet was given to us to use and use up and Jesus will swoop out of those clouds we’re manipulating at the last minute and rescue us from the mess we’ve made.Looking into God’s face in the clouds, I interpret this all as a mere excuse.To destroy the environment is to side with Dives as he makes his flaming bed of nails in Hell. This is why windows in an office are divine.
The Annals of Improbable Research every year offer up the Ignobel Prize for research that is bound to raise a condescending smile from the perspicacious. Ever practical Americans are given a bemused nod by the European for taking on the stranger side of science. This year’s Ignobel went to a group studying why banana peels are slippery, but a BBC Science and Environment report also mentioned a study of the phenomenon of pareidolia. For many years I have found the tendency to see faces where they don’t exist—signal amid the noise—to be closely tied with religious evolution. (The book that started me down this path was Stewart Guthrie’s Faces in the Clouds.) Indeed, the BBC reports the group was investigating the brains of those who see Jesus and other specific figures on toast and other venues of visual “white noise.” Not surprisingly, they found that the figure seen often relates to the religion of the viewer. Buddha gets around as much as Jesus does.
Ironically, many religions, particularly in the monotheistic mold, tend to find images problematic. According to the Bible, the true believer would not make or seek images at all. The great iconoclasm clash in late antique Christianity was, at least in part, a dispute over the role of images. Anyone who keeps an eye on the religious news knows that images of Mohammad are a particularly touchy subject. The Ignobel awards may not be the best place to look for explanations, but the University of Toronto team found that the function of finding faces is pre-human and is hardwired into our brains. Seeing Jesus or Buddha before Jesus or Buddha were born? Creatures with faces evolved the knack to identify faces.
But why religious faces? The report on the BBC doesn’t go into that level of detail, but it is the salient point. Finding faces makes sense. Why we find religious faces is far more interesting. Guthrie suggests this might be the origin of religion itself—first we see the faces and then we give them names. We see what we expect to see. And maybe the religious tend to expect an epiphany more readily than the non-religious. The non-religious less seldom report seeing such faces. Indeed, the word pareidolia is still generally eschewed since it admits of one of those things we find somewhat embarrassing about being human. And yet it happens to us all. The face staring back at you from your morning toast may not be Jesus, but chances are that face will be religious.