It’s a strange sensation to do an innocent web search only to find yourself cited. (And no, I was not googling myself. At least not this time.) I was searching an obscure publisher and my own pre-publication book, Holy Horror, came up on Google books. Now, the computer engineers I know tell me that Google remembers your searches, and this has a way of being unintentionally flattering; when I search for my book it pops up on the first page because I have searched for it before. Still, it was a bit of a surprise to find myself where I had no idea I’d been cited. All of this drew my mind back to my “post-graduate” days at Edinburgh University. To how much the world has changed.
One of the first things you learn as a grad student is you can’t believe everything you read. Granted, most of us learned that as children, but nevertheless, with academic publishing a new bar is raised. That which is published by a university press is authoritative. So we’re led to believe. But even university presses can be fooled. This prompts the fundamental question of who you can really believe. Our current political climate has elevated that uncertainty to crisis levels, of course, and the vast majority of people aren’t equipped to deconstruct arguments shouted loudly. Where you read something matters. Even publishers, however, are fallible. So what am I to make of being cited by the web? And is my book already available before I have seen a copy?
Even credibility can be bought and sold. Colleagues make a much better living than me with the same level of training, but with more influential connections. It was just this reason that I decided to try to shift my writing to these who don’t need credentials to impress each other. Some of the smartest people I ever knew were the janitors with whom I started my working life. As a fellow post-grad in Edinburgh once said, professors are always ready to fail you for your lack of knowledge but most can’t tell you what an immersion heater is. (That’s one of those Britishisms that no amount of graduate courses at Harvard will teach you.) I suppose when it’s all said and done nobody else will ever search for the obscure publisher that brought my book to Google’s attention. No matter, at least Google will always flatter me.
Posted in Books, Britannia, Higher Education, Just for Fun, Memoirs, Posts, Publishing
Tagged academic publishing, Edinburgh University, Google, Google books, Holy Horror, university presses
Every great once in a while I have to pull my head from the clouds and remind myself I’m an editor. Actually, that happens just about every Monday morning. Surprisingly, academics who have trouble getting published don’t bother to consult editors for advice. Having sat on both sides of that particular desk, I certainly don’t mind sharing what I’ve learned since publishing isn’t as straightforward as it seems. It has its own mythology and authors—I speak from experience here—feel extremely protective of their books. Nevertheless, editors are under-utilized resources when it comes to figuring out how to approach a topic. They often possess valuable advice.
It’s easy to think publishing exists to preserve and disseminate ideas and insights, tout court. The idea that if you get past your dissertation committee you’ve done service that requires wide readership is natural enough. Publishers, however, have other angles to consider. Books incur costs, and not just paper, glue, and ink. There are many people involved in bringing a book from idea to object, and each of them has to be paid to do their part. (Many academics in the humanities may not understand the concept of “overhead,” but it’s an everyday reality in the publishing world.) Not only that, but even the book itself is a matter of negotiation. My latest book (and I suspect well over 90 percent of the authors with whom I work have no idea that I write books as well) had a chapter expunged and a new one written at the behest of my McFarland editor.
One of the pervasive myths in this business is that authors write whatever book they want and then find a publisher. Sometimes that works. Often when it does the authors are disappointed in the results. There are presses that specialize in cranking out such works, slapping an enormous price tag on them, selling them to libraries, and then letting them go out of print. I’ve been there. I know. Academics want prestige presses to take their books to a higher profile, but without having to change things according to the advice of an editor. There are hidden lives of editors. I can’t share much of that here, but I can expound its corollary—taking advantage of free editorial advice makes good sense. I wouldn’t be bothering you with such mundane thoughts on this blog, but when I rolled out of bed today I learned it was Monday morning.
Stephen King was still a fairly new writer when I first read “Lawnmower Man” for an English class in high school. Carrie had been published by then, but I didn’t read any more Stephen King until after my academic job ended. (There is, for those who are curious, a correlation between that traumatic change and my interest in horror.) Like many, I suspect, I saw some of the movies before reading the King books behind them. With a writer as prolific as King there’s always the issue of where to start, and I’m often subject to the selections independent bookstore owners make. I seldom buy fiction through Amazon—I have to see the book for it to grab me (a kind of King thing to happen).
A used copy of Carrie recently came my way. Now, I’ve seen the movie (both versions) many times; it is discussed at some length in Holy Horror. I’d not read the novel until now. Obviously there are differences between book and movie, but as this was Stephen King’s debut novel it struck me just how central religion was to the fearful scenario he paints. That’s pretty clear in the film, I know, but it’s even more so in the novel. Carrie is made into a monster by religion. One could argue that she was born that way—telekinesis as a genetic marker is also a theme in the book, although absent from the films. Still, it is Carrie’s rejection by others, largely because of her religion, that leads her to use her powers to destroy Chamberlain, Maine.
In a strange way, Carrie is a coming-of-age story from a girl’s perspective. Strange because King is a man and some literary magazines won’t even accept stories written from the point-of-view of someone of the opposite gender. Men can’t know what women go through. Indeed, most of the male characters in the story are less than admirable, while some are downright wicked. The real question is whether religion saves from wickedness or causes it. There’s not much ambiguity here on the part of Mr. King. Holy Horror, although it deals with movies and not novels, makes the point that films based King don’t infrequently use religion as a source of horror. Long-time readers of this blog know that I frequently make the point that this genre, more so than most, relies on religion as an engine to drive it. And religion also has a role in repressing women. Coincidence? Ask Carrie.
Posted in American Religion, Books, Feminism, Literature, Memoirs, Monsters, Movies, Popular Culture, Posts, Religious Violence
Tagged Carrie, Feminism, Holy Horror, horror films, Stephen King, telekinesis
Finally! I have sent my proofs and the index for Holy Horror back to McFarland and I find myself in that state following intensive concentration on one thing. Well, as much as work will allow such concentration. Those who write books know how difficult it is to switch gears from fifth back to first while driving at highway speeds. As soon as the email arrived stating that the proofs were ready, I dropped everything to get them read, outside work hours, of course. With mind focused on a single goal—get the job done—I’ve managed to forget where I was before being interrupted by my own work. I recall it had something to do with demons, though.
Perhaps the most taxing part of trying to write while employed full time is keeping track of where you are. The luxury of spending hours outside of class doing the index, for example, is compressed into the little free time I have between writing for this blog and work—between a blog and a hard place, as it were. Indexing, which can be quite pricey when a professional does it, is much easier with a searchable PDF than it ever was going through a printout page-by-page to find obscure references you forgot you ever wrote. It reminded me of the time I had Owen Chadwick over for dinner at Nashotah House. I recalled someone asking him about something he’d once written and he looked puzzled for a moment and then replied, “One writes so many things.” Indeed. Millions and million of words in electrons, if not on paper, mark the status of a life. And indexing will prove it to you somehow.
This morning I awoke with the proofs and index safely emailed back to the publisher. What was I doing before that? I know that work is looming just a short hour or two ahead, and I need to accomplish part of my life’s work before going to work. I can’t afford to waste this time. Nightmares with the Bible is coming along nicely. A very drafty draft of the book exists. I have some more research to do, however, and the annotated bibliography—ah, that’s where I left off!—is still a shambles. Not only that, but I’ve got a stack of reading on the topic next to my chair. Time to put on a pot of coffee and warm up those typing fingers. I’ve got real work to do.
Posted in American Religion, Bible, Books, Memoirs, Monsters, Movies, Posts
Tagged Holy Horror, indexing, McFarland Books, Nashotah House, Nightmares with the Bible, Owen Chadwick
Publishing is a slow business. In a world of instant information, such plodding may appear to be old-fashioned. Outdated. Each step of the process takes time and anyone can sit down and type thoughts directly into the internet, so why bother with traditional publishing? These thoughts come to me as I read through the proofs of Holy Horror, and work on the index. This is time-consuming, and time is hard to come by. That, I suppose, is a major reason for doing things this way. Ironically, people don’t have a problem seeing that handmade items—which tend to take time and be less efficient than machine-made articles—are more valuable. They represent care and quality, things that a machine can’t assess well. This is the world beyond math. It is the human world.
Those of us born before computers took over sometimes have difficulty adjusting. The world of the instant goes well with inflation—the myth that constant growth in a limited world is possible. The fact is that value is a human judgment and we value things that take time. It’s true that most non-fiction books are instantly dated these days. Often it’s because information flies more quickly than pre-press operations. It takes a couple years to write a book and a publisher takes a year or two getting it into print. Back when the process was invented news traveled slowly and, I venture to say as a historian of sorts, didn’t often carry the dramatic shifts we witness today. A book could take a long time to appear and still be fresh and new when it did. For the internet generation it may be hard to see that this is an issue of quality.
Most of us are content with the satisfactory. We’re willing to sacrifice quality for convenience. We do it all the time. Then, in the recording industry, vinyl starts to come back. Corporate bigwigs—for whom fast and cheap is best—express surprise. Why would anyone buy a record? The question can only be answered by those who’ve listened to one. There is a difference, a difference that we’ve mostly been willing to jettison for the convenience of the instant download. Our lives are being cluttered with disposable-quality material. Even now I’m writing this daily update for my blog rather than continuing the drudgery of working on an index. We all have expectations of alacrity, I guess. The slower world of publishing is more my speed.
Writers anticipate and dread proofs. After several months of delay, I have received the proofs for Holy Horror—it should be out in the next couple of months for both of you who’ve asked about it. Anticipation is pretty straightforward, but why the dread? Those of us who write books have to deal with the fact that publishing is, by nature, a slow business. What I’m proofreading now is material that I wrote a couple of years ago; the final manuscript was submitted back in January. The internet has accelerated the pace of everything, and now that I have a daily record of my public thoughts on this blog, I can see how my own outlook has changed in that time. Reading proofs reminds you of whence you came, not where you are.
I suspect that has something to do with the internet and instant access to information. I also suspect that’s why many of us trust books more than the “open web.” The oak that has taken centuries to grow is a hardy tree. The handcrafted piece of furniture lasts longer than the mass produced. Books, hopefully, stand the test of time. Writing is an exercise in building eternity. These thoughts, the author hopes, will be around for some time to come. As long as libraries endure. Looking at the proofs, there’s pressure to get things right. Was I correct in what I wrote down so long ago? Since then I’ve read dozens of books more. I’ve even written the draft of another book myself. I face the proofs and shudder.
Part of my angst, I suppose, is that Holy Horror will likely sell better than my previous two books. It may actually get read. No, it won’t be any kind of best-seller, but perhaps a few hundred people will read it. That’s a lot of pressure for those of us who’ve primarily written for other academics. Perhaps this fear is the reason I’ve moved to writing about horror films. Those of us blocked from the academy have to build our own credibility, one book at a time. Reading the proofs, although already dated, I find myself liking this book. It was fun to write, and it has a good message, I think. Even prestige presses know that books about horror films are of popular interest. As I read through where my mind was in days stretching back before the nightmare of Trump, I see that I had only just started on this path. Before me are the proofs of that.
Holy Horror, it looks like, has been delayed until January. That doesn’t mean that I have to wait to find some relief in the escape to film. Over the weekend my wife surprised me by being willing to watch The Exorcist with me. As we settled in to see it, a few things occurred to me—watching horror with someone else isn’t nearly as frightening as watching it alone. I know this from experience, and it seems that it has something to do with the willing suspension of disbelief. It’s harder to do when someone is with you. Left to one’s own devices, it’s possible to believe what you’re watching, even if intellectually you know that it is merely a movie. That tells us something about the way brains are wired.
I object to the word “wired,” really. As organic beings, we are not computers. What invented consciousness would watch a scary movie for pleasure? What is the rationale for it? It was a gray and rainy Saturday evening in late October. In human experience that may be all that it takes. Seeing orange and black in the stores sets a mood that computers, I strongly suspect, simply can’t feel. They lack the human experience of childhood trick-or-treating, or throwing on another layer as the days grow chillier, or watching the leaves turn and slowly drift down from weary trees. No, these aren’t wired experiences—they’re very organic ones, and often those that mean something even to adults as the seasons wend their way through the calendar.
The author waiting for proofs is rather like an expectant parent. Well, that analogy’s not quite right either, but you get the point. I know the book is coming. It was accepted and submitted long ago. The publication process, however, is more complex than most people might assume. In fact, in the publishing industry it is often the main role of the editorial assistant to assure that manuscripts make it through all of the necessary hoops to move from finished manuscript to printed book. Johannes Gutenberg likely had a simpler process worked out, although, in the early days of book-buying you could purchase the pages and have them bound by your choice of bindery. Now cover and content are glued or stitched together in what one hopes is a seamless way. Still, that stitching can’t help but to recall Frankenstein’s monster. It is, however, another gray, rainy day in October. It’s just a shame my computer can’t share the experience with me.
Posted in Books, Consciousness, Memoirs, Monsters, Movies, Posts
Tagged brains, Holy Horror, neurology, October, seasons, The Exorcist