There are times when the Internet’s asleep.Okay, well, so maybe that’s overstated, but if you have my hours you’ll quickly find the things you can’t do online well before 9 a.m.For example, just the other day I wanted to check out one of my accounts that I only vaguely understand.It’s with a company my employer contracts with, and it has an innocuous name that tells you nothing about what it really does.Still, I had to check in.After looking up the password, and going through the usual 18-step confirmation of my identity (it didn’t recognize my laptop), I landed on a page stating that it was the routine maintenance period for the website, and would I be so kind as to check back in later.This is not an isolated incident.In fact, I often awake around 3 a.m. to find that my laptop’s also doing routine maintenance, although I’m using it nearly every day at that time.Smart tech, indeed.
You see, the ultra-early riser has a different view of time than the rest of the world.After about 4 p.m. I don’t have the sharpness that was evident twelve hours before.Oh, I can still function, but it’s on auxiliary power.No warp drive that late in the day.I realize I’m the weird one here.After visiting friends and family and staying up to the obscenely late hour of 10 p.m., I’ll take an entire week to get back on track with days passing in a fuzzy haze of timely confusion.I’ve been trying to break the habit for over a year now, but I still occasionally have to go into New York City, and those days require ultra-early awakening.Knowing such a day is coming up, my body doesn’t want to be vulnerable to that shift.So I wake up naturally when many others are just getting to bed.
This is mid-day for some of us.
The problem with this is that if you have to get some business done before work hours, many websites are undergoing their maintenance.They don’t want to be interrupted when I’m actually alert.There’s a lot of talk about diversity these days, but the person trapped in the early rising net is not a protected category.It is frustrating to have people say “why don’t you just go back to sleep?” when you can’t.I’ve gotten used to all that.The early bird, they say, gets the worm.That depends, however, whether the worm is on the Internet or not because, believe it or not, the Internet slumbers in the middle of the night.
Where do we find reliable information?I’m asking this question on an internet-based medium, which itself is ironic.While spending time with some younger people, it’s become clear that the web is their source of truth.You find purveyors of information that you trust, and you accept their YouTube channels as representing correct data.This can be a disorienting experience for an old doubter like me.One of the reasons for studying for a Ph.D., apart from the vain hope of finding a career in higher education, is to hone critical thinking skills.When I went through the process, that involved reading lots and lots of print material, assessing it, and weighing it against alternative views, also in print format.You learn who really makes sense and you judge which publishers have good information more frequently.As you navigate, you do so critically, questioning where they get their information.
Now, I’m not one of those people who think the younger generation is wrong (in fact, there are YouTube educational videos about just that).The situation does, however, leave me wondering about how to fact-check when you don’t know the publisher.It may be an older person’s problem, but it’s essentially the same dilemma behind self-publishing—the reason you trust a self-published book depends on the author alone.Is s/he persuasive?Did s/he document the sources of her/his information?Are those sources good ones?The young people I know seem quite adept at filtering out obviously biased information.Many YouTube personalities footnote their presentations with links to sources (many of them online), and after an hour of watching I’m left questioning what’s really real at all.
You see, many of these internet personalities have sponsors.Sponsors bring money, and money biases anyone’s angle toward the truth.In fact, many of these YouTube sources call out the lobbying groups that influence public opinion for political ends.Only someone completely naive—no matter their generation—would not acknowledge that government runs on money provided by corporations with interests to be protected.There have been reliable sources, even from the days of print, that prove beyond any reasonable doubt just how corrupt governments tend to be.But who has time to fact-check the government when the rest of the information we receive is suspect?Those of us with training in advanced critical thinking aren’t immune from biased information.It’s just that there’s so much data on the web that my head’s spinning.I think I need to go read a book.
You can’t believe everything you read.That’s one of the first tenets of critical thinking.This whole process is about how to get to the truth, and in a materialistic world that truth can’t involve anything supernatural.These were my thoughts upon finishing Gerald Brittle’s The Devil in Connecticut.Controversy accompanied Ed and Lorraine Warren’s investigations and some of the people involved in these cases have later claimed the extraordinary events didn’t happen.Others claim that the Warrens offered them to make lots of money by selling their stories.The effect of reading a book like this is a blend of skepticism and wonder.Among their fans the Warrens are held in the highest regard.Anyone who begins to look into their work critically ends up frustrated.
So when I put this potboiler down—it is a compelling read—I went to the internet to find out more.Then I realized what I was doing.Using the internet?To find the truth?It’s a vast storehouse of opinion, to be sure, but what with fake news and alternative facts who knows what to believe anymore?I found websites debunking the whole case as a hoax.Others, naturally, claim the events really happened.Both kinds of web pages have the backing of someone in the family involved.It’s a pattern that follows the Warrens’ work.In one of the many books I’ve read about them they claim to have ten books.If my math is right this was number ten.Even that remains open to doubt.
The word “hoax” seems a bit overblown.Dysfunctional, maybe, but hoax?Reading Brittle’s account it’s clear there were some issues in this family.Having grown up in a working class setting, I’m aware such scenarios are extremely common.Accusations were made that this was an attempt to spin gold from straw.The nearly constant stress of blue collar families makes that seem less far-fetched than a stereotypical devil showing up in a modern house because a satanic rock band placed a curse on the family.Lawsuits—the most avaricious of means for determining facts—apparently prevented a movie deal and have even made this book a collector’s item.Somebody, it seems, is making money off the story.As after reading the other nine books, the truly curious are left wondering.My skepticism kicked in early on, but then again, I’ve always liked a good story.
Are we really happier for instantaneous news?Has the internet brought us paroxysms of ecstasy with the quality of information?Wouldn’t you just rather wait?I don’t think we should go to extremes, or go backward.Samuel Morse, it is said, developed the telegraph in part because he was away from home and only found out about his wife’s death after her burial, for which he could not return in time.More rapid communication was necessary and the telegraph provided the means.No, I’m not suggesting that happiness lies in being uninformed, but perhaps I lingered long enough among the Episcopalians so as to believe in the via media, the middle way.Some of the happiest times of my life have been spent without a screen glowing in my face.There is, however, good stuff here.
One example is blogging.I wish I had more time to read blogs.Verbomania, for example, showcases writing that sparkles.The weekly posts set me up for a good weekend.There are many more that I could name as well—and for me blogging has become a way of life.Marketers call it “platform building” but I think of it as fun.And the practice I get writing this blog daily has made my books much more user-friendly.A family friend with no college education tried to read Weathering the Psalms, with “tried” being the operative word.There’s no comparison with Holy Horror.(Weathering the Psalms was written to be my “tenure book,” and it may well be my last technical monograph.)I have this avocation of blogging to thank for that.
But instantaneous news—does it make us happier?Sometimes perhaps, but often the opposite.It’s a phenomenon I call the internet of unhappiness.(There’s a whole field of study emerging called “the internet of things,” which, no matter how much I ponder I just can’t comprehend.)News, after all, tends to focus on negatives, as if there’s too much happiness in our lives.Just yesterday there were early morning helicopters hovering not far from where I live.Within seconds I could learn of some kind of domestic dispute about which I’d otherwise have been none the wiser.The next few hours I spent occasionally reloading the page for updates.They didn’t make me happy.Add to that the three-ring sideshow that the American government has become and you’ll soon be wanting just three channels from which to select before turning off the TV and going outside for a walk.And when the 1970s start to look like happy times, you go to your closet and start digging for the semaphore flags.
While in the theater to see The Nun (which ended up being the biggest take) this weekend, I couldn’t help but notice that the pre-movie adds were all about apps.I couldn’t help it because, much to my own chagrin, I’d left the house too quickly and I hadn’t brought a book to read while waiting.This may not be news to some people, but different cinema chains have different “channels” of what passes for entertainment and ads to try to draw viewers in early.The movie house we used to frequent in New Jersey had a variety of goods on show, most of the time.The one we visited here in Pennsylvania presumed that everyone had their phones in hand, waiting for the show to begin.On screen was the idolization of the app.
My phone is old enough that most modern apps don’t work on it.Most of the time that doesn’t matter to me since I’m not addicted to the device.Of course, when you’re trying to park your car in a town that offers only online options for such a convenience, I sometimes wish I could download the relevant necessary software.Otherwise, I often wonder what we’ve lost in our lust for connectivity.Coming out of New York on the longer distance bus recently, the driver called out, as leaving the Port Authority, “Lights on or off?”The unanimous chorus, for I didn’t speak, answered “Off!”I glanced around.I was surrounded by devices.I carry a book-light with me on the bus, for this has happened before.
“Drink the Kool-Aid” has become post-Jonestown slang for simply following the suggestion of someone without considering the consequences.I sometimes wonder if our smartphones come in more than one flavor.I’m not talking about features or physical colors.As apps chip away at our money, a little bit at a time, they also take larger pieces of our time.I’ve experienced it too, but mostly on my laptop (I don’t text—my thumbs aren’t that limber, and besides, the apocopated messages often lead to misunderstanding, emojis or not), the wonder of one link leading to another then realizing an hour has disappeared and I still feel hungry.Perhaps that’s the draw to the modern commuter.Or movie goer.I’m sitting in the theater, taking a break from unpacking.In my version of multitasking, I’m also doing research by watching a horror movie.Around me eyes glow eerily in the dark.I’m lost in the forest of unsleeping apps.
A family friend recently died.I was in New York City when I received the news, and I mused how recent a phenomenon this speed of information is.The news wasn’t necessarily a shock—this friend had been experiencing failing health, he was a close friend of my grandfather—but for some reason Samuel F. B. Morse came to mind.The story goes that Morse invented the telegraph because of his experience of being away from home when his wife died.By the time he received the news and was able to get home by the conveyance of the day, she’s already been buried.He set his inventive mind to improving the speed of communication over a distance.In these days of receiving texts mere seconds after something momentous happens, it’s difficult to imagine that for the vast majority of human existence, personal news traveled slowly.
Feeling in a reflective mood I recalled how when I was in college I wrote letters home.Yes, the telephone existed by then—don’t be so cynical!—but long distance bore a cost and college students find ways to save their money for girlfriends or spending a weekend in Pittsburgh.News traveled more slowly.Back before Morse, the swiftest option was the letter.The death of a friend might take days or weeks to reach those close.Distance in time, as well as space, may not have lessened the shock, but the immediacy of a text wasn’t there.The death had occurred days or weeks ago.There was nothing left to do but grieve and get on with life.Like Samuel Morse—perhaps the only point of comparison between us—I was unable to get away immediately.New York City isn’t easy to escape quickly.
We move swiftly and slowly at the same time.I know news moments from the event, but this physical mass I inhabit is sluggish takes some time to get around.Manhattan’s an island, and although it’s not Styx we’re crossing, the Hudson creates barriers enough.Now my journey includes crossing the entire state of New Jersey before I can even reach home.Were I to drive back to my original home, it would add another five hours at least in the car.Sometimes I wonder if the immediacy of knowing is a blessing or a curse.The shock is immediate and visceral.But like an injection, the sharpness is quickly over and the dull ache sets in.Our family friend had been suffering for some time.Now he’s at peace.I like to think he’s with my granddad, and that the two of them together won’t judge me too harshly for moving so slowly.
Those who pay close attention, or who have nothing better to do in July, may have noticed that I missed a day posting on this blog on Saturday.That hasn’t happened for a few years now.I think maybe I ‘m growing up.Or learning to resist.Saturday was a travel day—the first I had to make from Pennsylvania, back to Newark in order to fly to Washington state and drive a few hours to the lake.All in all, it turned out to be a long day in which I didn’t even notice that I was unplugged.I had a book that I read along the way.Although it’s against my religion—(call it Moby)—(but I jest)—I even fell into a cat nap or two on the plane.I didn’t have a window seat and strangers don’t like you staring in their direction for five hours at a time.
Upon awaking, eyes refusing at first to work in tandem, in the chill mountain air, I realized I’d spent the entire day off the internet.We had to pull out at 2:30 a.m. to meet TSA requirements, and you have to pay for the privilege of connecting to the web in airports and on board jets.I’ve become so accustomed to being wired that I feel I have to explain why I wasn’t able to post a few thoughts when circumstances were so adverse to getting tangled in the world-wide web.Yes, it still has a few gaps where one might buzz through without being caught.
It was remarkably freeing to be unplugged.I believe Morpheus may be correct that they want us to believe reality is otherwise.I feel guilty for not checking email manically.What if someone requires something right away?Some sage response to a communique that just can’t wait until I’m back from vacation?Some reason that I must ask to be inserted back into the matrix if just for a few moments, to hit the reply button?We’ve perhaps been exposed to what The Incredibles 2 calls the Screenslaver, the force that draws our gaze from even the beauty of a mountain lake to the device in our hand, whining for attention.We have wifi here, of course, for the fantasy of living raw is sustainable for only a few hours at a time.Reality, as you know if you’re reading this, is electronic.But until I have to reinsert myself at the cost of my soul, I think I’m going to take a dip in the lake.