Mere Typography

Juxtapositions are important. The way that words are laid out on a page can say as much as the words themselves, as any poet knows. In the light of the ongoing media frenzy over Rev. Terry Jones’ misguided attempt to set everything right with the world – through fire – and a natural attempt to keep related stories together, the New Jersey Star-Ledger ran two stories on page three yesterday that display the deep ambivalence many Americans feel about Islamic culture. At the top of the page the headline reads, “In Florida pastor’s eyes, burning of Quran is an act of war against evil.” At the bottom of the same page runs an article headlined, “Iran: Stoning sentence for adultery under review.” Two or more faces of Islamophobia on the same page.

As remarks made on my previous post on the subject attest, many westerners simply do not understand Islam. This is perhaps to be blamed on the all-too-prevalent attitude that “history is boring.” Have people been asleep for the past thirteen centuries? Islam is much closer in time to the origin of Christianity than it is to us. With concerns of supersessionism and the covert desire to capitalize on one’s religion, Christianity has been content to ignore Islam as long as those in charge have been able to maintain capitalist quo. When forced to face the fact that two major monotheistic religions have designs on the same world, some members of each camp are only too ready to declare those in the other “evil.” An attempt to understand other religions would go a long way toward ending the carnage.

Perhaps the phobia should more properly be labeled religious xenophobia. We dislike those different from us. Rare is the person who, when confronted with a contrarian, will attempt to understand rather than destroy. Students may readily qualify for higher education degrees without ever having to face the question of how to handle different religious outlooks. We would rather pretend that they are not there. The ambivalence shown towards the issues of Islam in the Star-Ledger could just as easily be turned on Christianity, or even Judaism, Hinduism, Buddhism, or Sikhism. Religions are conflicted because people are conflicted. Instead of recriminating, we should all take a long, serious pause in front of a mirror before we start accusing other religions of being evil.

Who said what now?

5 thoughts on “Mere Typography

  1. Pingback: Tweets that mention Mere Typography | Sects and Violence in the Ancient World -- Topsy.com

  2. Henk van der Gaast

    wrt your comment “. Students may readily qualify for higher education degrees without ever having to face the question of how to handle different religious outlooks” only reflects one thing. . Students may readily qualify for higher education degrees in religion without understanding that religion is mythology.

    And with respect for your previous post? . Students may readily qualify for higher education degrees without ever having to face the question of how to handle different economic outlooks without ever having to face the question of how to handle different monetary outlooks..

    lets face it, neither are sciences no matter how they justify population movement. Its just that economics relies on history, religion relies on mythology and history can only demand account and relation to some tangible evidence.

    Looks like history has the upper hand here, at least it recognises the right god..

    Just ask any economist what a gold standard is. Its one of those questions where they would rather talk about their philandering partners…

    Goodness knows what a religious person really thinks what god is..But they’ll gladly talk about their communities philandering partners. My advice to a young turk, keep a notebook handy when talking to an elder, pastor or priest. These will likely tell you how to score.

    Ask Harvard what the value of having a faculty of economists is worth prior to a GFC.

    To be emphatic, for me a masters is not often much better than a good course work honours. Its not a higher degree and anyone who thinks so, has obtained a masters degree (by course work). These should really be relegated to post grad diploma unless a PhD is rejected on some technicality.

    Mind you, educational fascism is often thought of as lofty elitism. I prefer facism, at least folk know where they stand when they sell themselves as a “Moody Masters” graduate.

    Sorry for the spray but in the real world a PhD requires hard yakka and a brain. A masters should require almost as much. Enrolling for course work and instruction is called “undergrad”.

    There is way, way, way too much course work for woffly undergrad post grads and… relating back to your post, it gives an insane amount of kudos for someone who has attended class.

    no wonder your faculty graduates are confused. They should all leave as philosophical nihilists after an under grad in religion and insane technocrats as economists.

    Never compare such Steve, the world is full of faculties that promote woo and its just sad that you cant get through the veil in yours.

    Dale Martin can’t, why should we?

    I’ve failed.

    Like

  3. Pingback: Quran Burning and Non-Burning Around the Blogosphere « Utmosts

  4. As a recovering attorney, it’s perhaps inevitable that I see this as a matter of law. The evil I see in Islam is not in the beliefs about God, it’s in Islamic law. Sharia law is institutionalized pedophilia and misogyny. In this respect, I do see Western civilization as superior, or less evil, by far. Yes, there are child and wife abusers in the West, but they are not supported by our laws.

    Thanks so much for your post. All the best.

    Like

  5. Henk van der Gaast

    Law is a societal issue, I am sure if said recovering attorney was covering law from 60 years ago, he would relish defending priests and wife abusers…

    The sad thing is, there is no excuse for law in the eyes of the laws of a better society. Law based on testimony and witness is hardly fair. After all, self value is the coin of both.

    It just goes to show that a corrupt Sharia council (as intimated) can’t be any fairer than a corrupt district court.

    Shame on the legal process. No matter what it is, interpretation is for people in ballet shoes, not for life and death decisions.

    But I am glad I had the opportunity to point this out to our recovering attorney. I hope he is becoming a burgeoning scientist.

    Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.