Disconnect

Religion has a bad name among many intellectuals. Hailing from the misty period of superstition in a “demon haunted world,” religion seems to be a quaint hold-over from less enlightened times. Academics, for whom respectability is everything, generally keep a decorous distance from religion as the intellectually suspect field indulged in by the weak-minded. Then something enormous happens; terrorists, fueled by religious fervor, decide to kill many innocent victims. Or a religious guru leads followers into the jungle where they all commit ritual suicide. Or a group of zealots purchase heavy armaments and stockpile them in a Texas hideout to await the Second Coming. The next autumn the university want ads are filled with openings for specialists in this or that religion. Until the next budget crunch comes along.

An unfortunate aspect of this situation is that many deans and administrators make the equation of the study of religion with the promotion of a religion. Why populate a university faculty with superstitious religious sorts when a good secular economist will bring in more practical, if less transcendent, rewards? How often do administrators survey their religious studies faculty to ensure that level-headed, academic treatment of the subject matter is offered? How can we expect to move ahead if those empowered to assure an educated student clientele continually apply the brakes in religious studies departments?

I am no economist. This much is evident by my pay scale. Nevertheless, each year when I return to the multiple campuses that are my temporary homes, I notice the details. New furniture in classrooms and libraries, freshly painted and redecorated facilities. Often, entirely new buildings that were not there the semester before. There was a day when such things were known as window-dressing. I attended Edinburgh University for my doctorate. There were campus buildings that dated from the late middle ages. Classrooms often had mismatched furniture and blackboards rather than fancy projectors and smart-ports. And the educational experience was authentic. The religion faculty was thriving and universally well regarded. I’m no economist, but with fundamentalists already holding a match to the fuse about to light up a Quran, I have a feeling already of what I’ll be seeing in the want ads of next year’s university hiring season.

One thought on “Disconnect

  1. Henk van der Gaast

    Bear with me for a moment,

    Dougal: I’m not surprised Ted. If I was a sheep. I’d be watching my back right now.
    Ted: Why?
    Dougal: Because of the beast. They say it’s as big as four cats, and it’s got a retractable leg so as it can leap up at you better and you know what Ted, it lights up at night, and it’s got four ears. Two of them are for listening and the other two are kind of back-up ears, and it’s claws are as big as cups and for some reason it’s got a tremendous fear of stamps and Mrs. Doyle was tellin’ me that it’s got magnets on it’s tail so’s if you’re made out of metal it can attach itself to you, and instead of a mouth it’s got four arses (Father Ted 1998)

    They weren’t talking about inane faculty competition for funds but a make believe monster.

    I am a firm believer in common lecture facilities to suit all students. From experience I know that university is not about technological interactivity in the lecture hall.

    You and I Steve, got our education in a time when technology was only just rearing its ugly head in the lecture theatres and the dreaded overhead projector was about as good as it got. Now every lecturer has (or had better have) his own laptop or PC to prepare lecture illustration.

    Now to our common cynicism of religious faculty drives; who or what university does not sacrifice its own good stead by having a woo-woo faculty to hold up as a light on the path of mutual elightenment for all?

    Whilst my alma mater is a very fine technology based university offering science and law (and economics) it also has its religious faculty. Its called the school of Traditional Chinese Medicine and basically gives the students three years of acupuncture training.

    You may ask why a scientific board would ever have allowed a faculty that has never once produced a single study of a modality that produces a therapeutic mode that can’t be pulled out from the noise?

    Well apart from being religiously delusional, the money and the band wagon sure helps image.

    In 1985 our vice chancellor had a framed poster in his office. It was of a UFO and under it was a statement, “I WANT TO BELIEVE”. He was way ahead of his time.

    Show me a university that has a central lecture facility or a number there of, that are rented by the faculties on a student requirement basis and I will show you there is parity for students.

    You can keep the loon faculties well away from such.

    Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.