New Salzburg

For some reason Austria is on my mind. It been more than two decades now since I have been there, but I recently decided to read a little of the history of Salzburg. My interest revolved around a case of religious intolerance that took place well before the days of political correctness, but after the idea of religious freedom was being promoted in New World colonies. Two centuries after Martin Luther’s theses stirred the world (perhaps the last time in history a religious thesis has received such attention), the Roman Catholic Archbishop—and Count! (rank has its privileges)—Leopold Anton von Firmian decided to expel the Protestants from Salzburg. Religious diversity was frequently seen as a threat to civil authority. Either Protestants would recant or be forced from their homes in the winter, often losing everything they had in the process. A substantial number of citizens were exiled and found little in the way of refuge. Prussia finally offered some quarter and others made their way to England or to a then religiously tolerant Georgia.

Religious imperialism is a funny phenomenon. Religions, as sets of teachings, often emphasize the just and fair treatment of other people. When powerful people (or power-hungry people) become religious they find a great mind-control technique available in it. Popes, for instance, very quickly ceased being pastors and instead styled themselves as princes. This was a safe move since Jesus was king, and since he’s in heaven any attempts at usurpation are bound to be suspect. As a co-regent, however, various privileges apply! This is something Protestant reformers very swiftly learned as well. John Calvin was practically in charge of Geneva, and who can think of Lynchburg, Virginia without accounting for Jerry Falwell or Virginia Beach without Pat Robertson? Religion, by its genetic nature, seeks to take over and control.

In this it is not so different from other aggressive ideologies such as capitalism or communism. The problem is that religions claim sanction from the highest authority, and once a believer is convinced of that no amount of reason is sufficient to dissuade him or her. So it was that an Austrian Count, also an Archbishop, decided to turn out members of his own putative religion (Christianity) into a harsh winter where many would die and others would live the remainder of their lives in exile. Were this the hallmark of one religion alone we might have united together as a species and cast it out. Unfortunately history has repeatedly shown us that even the most placid religions can quickly form the dark face of a demonic storm front if certain of their privileges are threatened. No one likes to be wrong. In the game of religions, however, there must be losers if anyone is right. Where is the New Salzburg? It may be going by a different name these days.

3 thoughts on “New Salzburg

  1. You’re absolutely right. Religion was the problem and it continues to be a problem, because religion is the word we use to identify the rigmarole man creates to worship God, but that’s too narrow a definition. Take the conflict of Catholic versus Protestant out of the Salzburg equation. In the absence of the stated religious excuse do you really believe everyone would have lived happily ever after? Nope – old Leopold, or someone similar to him, would have still felt the need to flex his muscles and grab up some property. Man’s always going to be inhumane to man, but he rarely likes to just come out a ‘fess up that he did what he did because he wanted to. Man is just as likely to choose race as an excuse or political ideology or sexual orientation or perhaps even climate change if he thinks he can get enough people to see things his way by carrying any particular flag. Christianity’s biggest flaw has been its political success, not its God.

    Like

  2. My son and I were recently mountain climbing in Imst, Austria — still a spell from Salzburg. I did not know that history. But you are right, unlike the classic “Californian Conversation” where “everyone is cool”, religion does not tolerate this sort to dope-toking easygoingness — but then neither does science. But one is open to testing, the other is closed to reason but open to unchecked abuse.

    Like

  3. The religious persecution that drove settlers from Europe to the British North American colonies sprang from the conviction, held by Protestants and Catholics alike, that uniformity of religion must exist in any given society. This conviction rested on the belief that there was one true religion and that it was the duty of the civil authorities to impose it, forcibly if necessary, in the interest of saving the souls of all citizens. Nonconformists could expect no mercy and might be executed as heretics. The dominance of the concept, denounced by Roger Williams as “inforced uniformity of religion,” meant majority religious groups who controlled political power punished dissenters in their midst. In some areas Catholics persecuted Protestants, in others Protestants persecuted Catholics, and in still others Catholics and Protestants persecuted wayward coreligionists. Although England renounced religious persecution in 1689, it persisted on the European continent. Religious persecution, as observers in every century have commented, is often bloody and implacable and is remembered and resented for generations.

    Like

Leave a reply to Sabio Lantz Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.