I have no idea how they name winter storms, or even if they should.Weather-hype is yet another instance of click-bait, or watch-bait that requires constant upgrading to draw in increasingly jaded readers/watchers.Winter storms are a fact of life, particularly in northern states.If you name them, then you think you own them, as the saying goes.In any case, beyond the fact that they go through the alphabet to draw their inspiration, I have no clue what criteria are used for giving names.The storm that many of us were out in for much of the day yesterday was “Ezekiel.”There are plenty of “E” names available, and I wondered at this biblical choice.Ezekiel is often treated as a name for eccentrics, and I wondered if something about this storm was proto-apocalyptic or what.Beyond the standard “snowpocalypse,” I mean.
The storm may have been considered of “biblical” proportions since it affected/is affecting much of the nation (as it is me, even as I write).We tend to use the Bible for things that are of large scale, and, frequently, beyond our control.Prophets often called for events on national level, and Ezekiel’s message had to do with a kind of ultimate redemption.I suppose it’s the kind of message our nation could use right now, snow or not.We could use good times sent from above, following the decidedly unbiblical evangelical administration we’ve put up with for three years now.What would Ezekiel say?
Back in my teaching days, I had to cover Ezekiel in less time than the prophet deserved.He pantomimed the coming destruction of Jerusalem, and, among the exiles, proclaimed their return to a better future.Now I can’t say if winter storm Ezekiel will lead to a better future or not.It will lead to some sidewalk shoveling, some travel headaches (as we experience firsthand yesterday), and the usual array of winter wonders.I do know that claiming insanity to label a prophet is a cheap shot when it comes to explanations.Ancient people recognized madness when they saw it, and prophecy, they knew deep down, was different.None of this suggests this storm has been in any way predictable.Yesterday with its accumulation of sleet and freezing rain, and today with its projected snow are all part of a typical December around these parts.As people addicted to media stimulation, I guess we have to give it a name so that we can feel properly awed.
Stepping out of the airport the first thing I noticed was the palm trees.I’ve traveled to this area enough times that I shouldn’t be surprised, but I always am.And since we are creatures of the culture in which we’re raised, palm trees inevitably make me think of Gilligan’s Island.We grasp for culture to help us make sense of this odd world of negotiating other people and, like many children born in the sixties, I was raised on television.Gilligan’s Island (somehow appropriate training ground for attending AAR/SBL—it actually featured a professor) was as close to seeing a palm tree as I ever got, being raised in a very humble household.To me, palm trees were as much creatures of fantasy as the monsters that populated the movies I watched on Saturday afternoon.
My first experience of a real palm tree was in Israel, 1987.I’d signed on as a volunteer at Tel Dor, an archaeological dig near Haifa.Then, as yesterday, I encountered palm trees—so alien and yet so natural—at the airport.Welcome to Tel Aviv!And so we think of palm trees as being part of paradise, a place where it’s always pleasantly warm and although well-watered it doesn’t rain too much.Trees symbolize our culture.Although back home in the northeast most of the leaves are down from the hardwoods, the region is also defined by its large plants.Trees do that for us.Spreading high over our heads, with dense cellular structure that makes them heavy, trees have always been attractive to our species.And they can help us define, at a glance, where we are.“Paradise” derives from a Persian word for “garden.”Even in arid zones they value their trees.
Looking out my hotel window I see the bay.In the bay stands a marina.Back home most boats are shrink-wrapped by now and I’ve already seen smaller bodies of water start to freeze over.Paradise has no ice.For the castaways, being on the island was always a challenge, but never a terribly serious one.Thurston Howell III used his money (useless where there’s nothing to buy) to try to assert his influence.Everyone treated him with respect, always calling him “Mr. Howell.”In that paradise, however, one of the two characters (who had names) referred to always by title, the professor—the skipper, of course, was the other one—was the person looked to for guidance.If anyone would figure out a way to be rescued, it would be the academic.I’ll be spending the next few days on an island with mostly professors.And when it gets too intense I’ll look at the palm trees and remind myself that this is paradise.
Back when I was somebody—a professor is somebody, even if only a seminary professor—I was invited to meet with a group of Seattle writers and intellectuals.I was in Seattle already because driving all the way out here was possible when you live in the Midwest and your summers are basically open and free.(Professor’s privilege.)One of the group members, the one who invited me, asked me about grain.When the club met they ate.With a bent toward history, one of them brought period-appropriate bread.What kind would be fashionable for a night of ancient Near East talk?(I was still researching and writing on Ugarit at the time, before Ugaritology passed away.)Without stopping to think I replied “Einkorn.”I didn’t know if einkorn was still around or not.All I knew is that it was the earliest (at least as understood at that time) domesticated grain.The loaf that arrived that night was a more accessible grain variety.
All of this came back to me as I stood in the local health-food store.We don’t shop here for regular groceries—it’s expensive to eat healthily—but we’d been invited to someone’s house and said we’d bring appetizers.The health-food store had vegan cheeses, so we needed crackers to go with.Then I spied the word “einkorn.”The Seattle discussion had to be well onto two decades old by now.I was finally able to answer my question, einkorn was still alive.The craze for ancient grains did not exist in my professorate days.Some companies, according to occasional news stories, were trying to brew the beer of ancient Egypt or Sumer, but the health conscious hadn’t gone so far as to trying to replicate the diet of the earliest agriculturalists.
Ancient grains cost more because the yields are smaller.Although the grain heads look disturbingly like those house centipedes that scamper in the basement when you flip on the light, they aren’t nearly the size of a current wheat head.It stands to reason that it takes more of them to make up the same amount of flour, and appetites have grown over the millennia.Like most vegans, I read boxes.Another ancient grain cracker, apart from brown rice, included amaranth, flaxseed, millet, quinoa, sesame, and sorghum.Never mixed this way in antiquity (for amaranth and quinoa were part of the “new world” and the others “old”), modern mixologists have devised new ways of using ancient grains.Einkorn nearly went extinct with the development of wheat, rye, and barley.But it hung on, and now, as a dozen millennia ago, it has a way of sustaining both dreams and fantasies.
Humans can be quite likable, but we have some nasty traits.One is that we tend to think of ourselves as the only intelligent beings on the planet.The funny thing about evolution is that it gave us both big brains and opposable thumbs—a winning combination to destroy the planet.(Just look at Washington, DC and try to disagree.)Jennifer Ackerman’s The Genius of Birds is poignant in this context.Page after page of nearly unbelievable displays of intelligence among birds demonstrates that we are hardly alone on the smarts scale.Birds make and use tools, have better memories than most of us do, and can solve problems that I even have trouble following.We tend to take birds for granted because they seem to flit everywhere, but the book ends soberly by noting how global warming is driving many species to extinction.
Homo sapiens (I’ll leave out the questionable and redundant second sapiens) like to think we’ve got it all figured out.We tend to forget that we too evolved for our environment—we adapt well, which has allowed us to change our environment and adapt to it (again, opposable thumbs).Many scientists therefore conclude that we are the most intelligent beings in existence.Ironically they make such assertions when it’s clear that other species can perceive things we can’t.Ackerman’s chapter on migration states what we well know—migrating birds can sense the earth’s magnetic field, something beyond the ability of humans.We lack the correct organ or bulb or lobe to pick up that signal.And yet we think we can rule out other forms of intelligence when we don’t even know all the forms of possible sensory input.We could learn a lot from looking at birds, including a little humility.
The Genius of Birds explores several different kinds of intelligence.What becomes clear is that birds, like people, have minds.Like human beings they come on a scale of intellectual ability that doesn’t suggest only one kind is necessary.For our large brains we can’t seem to get it through our thick skulls that we need biodiversity.We need other species to fill other niches and our own remarkable ability to thrive has only been because we are part of a tremendous, interconnected net encompassing all of life.Other species have contributed to our evolution as we clearly do to theirs.When we end up thinking that we alone are smart and our own prosperity alone matters we are sawing away at the branch on which we sit.Further up the birds look at us and wonder if we really know what we’re doing.
Yellow and orange leaves on a damp pavement.A sky claustrophobically occluded with gray clouds.A decided chill in the air.All you have to do is add a few pumpkins and the feeling of October is complete.I don’t know why this particular image of the change of seasons grips me the way it does.As a homeowner I don’t want to turn the heat on too soon because the gas bills will jet up and will stay that way for seven or eight months.I get depressed when skys are cloudy for days at a time.Around here the leaves have only just begun to change.In other words, there’s a decided difference between the way I imagine October and the way that it feels on the ground.In my imagination there are Ray Bradbury titles, The October Country, The Autumn People, but here in the physical world I shiver and add another layer.
Over the past several weeks I’ve been struggling to figure out why horror appeals to me.It seems to be the Poe-esque mood rather than any startles or gore.The sense of mystery that hangs in the air when you simply don’t know what to expect.Will it be a warm, summer-like day or will it be rainy and raw, a day when you wouldn’t venture outside without the necessity to do so?October is like that.It is changeable.Beginning in late September it is dark longer than it is light and for much of the rest of the year I will go to bed when it’s dark outside.It’s always still dark when I awake.Is it any wonder that October has its hooks in me?
Short stories, of which I’ve had about twenty published, seem to be the best way to capture this mood.You see, it isn’t a sustained feeling.It’s piecemeal like that extra quilt you throw on your bed at night.The urge to hibernate creeps in, but capitalism doesn’t allow for that.October is an artist, and I’m just the guy wandering the galley, pausing before each painting.This feeling only comes after summer, and it is fleeting.In November the leaves will be down and the cold will settle in quite earnestly.The candles we lit for Halloween will be our guide-lights to those we hold out to Christmas when the dayglow will begin to return at an hour that reminds us change is the only thing that’s permanent.And in this there’s a profound hope.
The word “Anthropocene” has been showing up quite a bit lately.For a period of many years I was an avid, self-taught amateur geologist.In my dreams I still am, I guess.My interest in the ages of rocks began when I, like Charles Lyell, began to consider the implications of their extreme longevity.The Bible, of course, famously intimates we live in a comparatively new neighborhood.Having grown up believing that literally and firmly, and also having started a modest fossil collection, I failed to see the conflict.I mean, there were fossils right down there by the river.Tons of them.Some Young Earth Creationists had already begun, by that point, to suggest they’d arisen because of Noah’s flood, but dinosaurs still seemed to be a problem.In many ways rocks broke me out of my fundamentalist stupor.
While at Nashotah House I taught electives on Genesis 1-11.I read about the geologic ages of the planet and would fall into Devonian dreams of a world entirely different from ours—a world in which there was no Bible for there were no humans to make God in their image.I knew that we lived in the Quaternary Period of the Holocene Era.I don’t think the term Anthropocene was in wide use then.Parsing it is simple enough—it is the “human age.”The age in which the planet was, has been, and is being altered by human behavior. There’s no agreed-up start date for the Anthropocene, but it will likely be set in the twentieth century; the twentieth century in our way of counting.There have been millions of centuries before that.
A couple of weekends back I attended a church program on plastics.These useful polymers are deeply, deeply integrated into our lives and are promoted by the far too powerful petroleum industry.The problem with plastics is that they break down and invade the bodies of animals and humans.And although they do decompose it takes many centuries for them to do so.Naming the Anthropocene is an effort to get us to see that a human perspective is far too brief to deal with the many issues we raise.Our practices on this planet will likely not destroy the earth, but they may very well make it uninhabitable by us, or by creatures we like to see.Life is persistent, and rock lasts for eons.Even stone’s not eternal, however, and the idea of the Anthropocene is to get us to look at ourselves and realize that our use of this planet, as toxic as it is, is shortsighted.We will someday be the fossils under a bridge long crumbled to dust for those in the future who know of no such thing as Genesis. Perhaps we should act like it.
On the way home from Ithaca, we’ve learned the hard way to avoid I-80 through the Poconos on a holiday weekend.Past experience indicates that about 80 percent of the population of New Jersey (to be fair, a percentage of that may be those from New York City) tries to squeeze through the Delaware Water Gap at just about dinner-time the day before work starts again.There is a longer alternate route, I-476, the turnpike, which you catch north of Scranton and exit in Allentown.The only issue with this plan is that, unless you want to exit the turnpike to try to find food in rural Pennsylvania, there’s only one travel plaza between our entrance and exit.It’s a nice enough stopping point, but for a vegan on the road options are limited.As we pulled in we noticed there was a Burger King.Would they have the much touted “impossible burger”?
It turns out that they did.Having last had a whopper well over two decades ago, mouth memory may have faded a bit, but I can honestly say this was like the whopper I remembered.If you hold the cheese and mayo, you have a vegan version.This discovery made me strangely happy.For years at remote locations (and some urban) we’ve stopped when the only other options are meat based and had the BK veggie burger.It’s not too bad most of the time, but if you want to think you’re eating meat while not contributing to the massive environmental degradation of industrial farming, the impossible burger seems like a reasonable option.This is one area of technology that I’m glad seems to be catching up with ethics.
I often ponder how much our western point-of-view is based on the Bible.Our reluctance to include animals in our ethics is another example of how the hard line between species has been applied.Even scientists are susceptible to worldview bias.When we realize we’re all part of a continuum of biological relatedness, it’s a lot more difficult to argue for our special place in the divine eye.At the same time, insisting one’s ethics be applied to all is a form of fascism.I’m just glad my conscience can be assuaged with some plant-based food options.After all, I’ve been on the road for a few hours and I’m sitting here happy to be eating at Burger King.It’s a matter of perspective.