Stephen King was still a fairly new writer when I first read “Lawnmower Man” for an English class in high school. Carrie had been published by then, but I didn’t read any more Stephen King until after my academic job ended. (There is, for those who are curious, a correlation between that traumatic change and my interest in horror.) Like many, I suspect, I saw some of the movies before reading the King books behind them. With a writer as prolific as King there’s always the issue of where to start, and I’m often subject to the selections independent bookstore owners make. I seldom buy fiction through Amazon—I have to see the book for it to grab me (a kind of King thing to happen).
A used copy of Carrie recently came my way. Now, I’ve seen the movie (both versions) many times; it is discussed at some length in Holy Horror. I’d not read the novel until now. Obviously there are differences between book and movie, but as this was Stephen King’s debut novel it struck me just how central religion was to the fearful scenario he paints. That’s pretty clear in the film, I know, but it’s even more so in the novel. Carrie is made into a monster by religion. One could argue that she was born that way—telekinesis as a genetic marker is also a theme in the book, although absent from the films. Still, it is Carrie’s rejection by others, largely because of her religion, that leads her to use her powers to destroy Chamberlain, Maine.
In a strange way, Carrie is a coming-of-age story from a girl’s perspective. Strange because King is a man and some literary magazines won’t even accept stories written from the point-of-view of someone of the opposite gender. Men can’t know what women go through. Indeed, most of the male characters in the story are less than admirable, while some are downright wicked. The real question is whether religion saves from wickedness or causes it. There’s not much ambiguity here on the part of Mr. King. Holy Horror, although it deals with movies and not novels, makes the point that films based King don’t infrequently use religion as a source of horror. Long-time readers of this blog know that I frequently make the point that this genre, more so than most, relies on religion as an engine to drive it. And religion also has a role in repressing women. Coincidence? Ask Carrie.
Posted in American Religion, Books, Feminism, Literature, Memoirs, Monsters, Movies, Popular Culture, Posts, Religious Violence
Tagged Carrie, Feminism, Holy Horror, horror films, Stephen King, telekinesis
William Friedkin rose to fame as the director of The French Connection. William Peter Blatty had written the screenplay for the Pink Panther film, A Shot in the Dark. Now Blatty had a serious project in mind as he considered whom to pitch to direct the film of his novel, The Exorcist. He wanted, and got, Friedkin. The two disagreed about the final cut of the movie, with Friedkin winning out. The movie was a tremendous success. Several years later the cut favored by Blatty was released, again with success. Blatty died last year. The year before that so did Fr. Gabriele Amorth, an exorcist for the Diocese of Rome. Last night I watched The Devil and Father Amorth, a documentary by William Friedkin about the famed exorcist.
The Exorcist made an impact on the lives of many people, not least Friedkin. Over four decades after making this film, the director is still mulling it over. The Devil and Father Amorth is primarily footage shot by Friedkin of an exorcism performed by Amorth. In general the filming of exorcisms is forbidden, but given his stature as a film-maker, Friedkin was given permission to film without crew, on a small, hand-held video camera. Although nowhere near as violent as the fictionalized film, it is disturbing to watch. As a documentary, it includes interviews with doctors, some from Columbia University, who agree that possession is “a thing,” but one suspects they might disagree with the director as to what that thing might be.
Although Friedkin isn’t an academic, society accepts that (at least some) film-makers are intellectuals. Perhaps lacking subject specialization, they nevertheless read a lot and possess quite a bit of street knowledge concerning psychology. Friedkin does. At just over an hour, this documentary isn’t long, but it is provocative. For me it raises once again an issue that I address in Nightmares with the Bible—the curious laity, due to lack of engagement by traditional scholars, must rely on such efforts to get information about spiritual entities. The documentary, which deals with a heavy subject, is one that Friedkin tries to lighten a bit at the end by stating that if there are demons then angels must also exist. This goes back to the idea, discussed more fully in my book, that demons derive from fallen angels. The “one size fits all” approach of academia has shoehorned belief in one direction. While The Devil and Father Amorth won’t likely convince skeptics, many who watch it will be left wondering.
Finally! I have sent my proofs and the index for Holy Horror back to McFarland and I find myself in that state following intensive concentration on one thing. Well, as much as work will allow such concentration. Those who write books know how difficult it is to switch gears from fifth back to first while driving at highway speeds. As soon as the email arrived stating that the proofs were ready, I dropped everything to get them read, outside work hours, of course. With mind focused on a single goal—get the job done—I’ve managed to forget where I was before being interrupted by my own work. I recall it had something to do with demons, though.
Perhaps the most taxing part of trying to write while employed full time is keeping track of where you are. The luxury of spending hours outside of class doing the index, for example, is compressed into the little free time I have between writing for this blog and work—between a blog and a hard place, as it were. Indexing, which can be quite pricey when a professional does it, is much easier with a searchable PDF than it ever was going through a printout page-by-page to find obscure references you forgot you ever wrote. It reminded me of the time I had Owen Chadwick over for dinner at Nashotah House. I recalled someone asking him about something he’d once written and he looked puzzled for a moment and then replied, “One writes so many things.” Indeed. Millions and million of words in electrons, if not on paper, mark the status of a life. And indexing will prove it to you somehow.
This morning I awoke with the proofs and index safely emailed back to the publisher. What was I doing before that? I know that work is looming just a short hour or two ahead, and I need to accomplish part of my life’s work before going to work. I can’t afford to waste this time. Nightmares with the Bible is coming along nicely. A very drafty draft of the book exists. I have some more research to do, however, and the annotated bibliography—ah, that’s where I left off!—is still a shambles. Not only that, but I’ve got a stack of reading on the topic next to my chair. Time to put on a pot of coffee and warm up those typing fingers. I’ve got real work to do.
Posted in American Religion, Bible, Books, Memoirs, Monsters, Movies, Posts
Tagged Holy Horror, indexing, McFarland Books, Nashotah House, Nightmares with the Bible, Owen Chadwick
Writers anticipate and dread proofs. After several months of delay, I have received the proofs for Holy Horror—it should be out in the next couple of months for both of you who’ve asked about it. Anticipation is pretty straightforward, but why the dread? Those of us who write books have to deal with the fact that publishing is, by nature, a slow business. What I’m proofreading now is material that I wrote a couple of years ago; the final manuscript was submitted back in January. The internet has accelerated the pace of everything, and now that I have a daily record of my public thoughts on this blog, I can see how my own outlook has changed in that time. Reading proofs reminds you of whence you came, not where you are.
I suspect that has something to do with the internet and instant access to information. I also suspect that’s why many of us trust books more than the “open web.” The oak that has taken centuries to grow is a hardy tree. The handcrafted piece of furniture lasts longer than the mass produced. Books, hopefully, stand the test of time. Writing is an exercise in building eternity. These thoughts, the author hopes, will be around for some time to come. As long as libraries endure. Looking at the proofs, there’s pressure to get things right. Was I correct in what I wrote down so long ago? Since then I’ve read dozens of books more. I’ve even written the draft of another book myself. I face the proofs and shudder.
Part of my angst, I suppose, is that Holy Horror will likely sell better than my previous two books. It may actually get read. No, it won’t be any kind of best-seller, but perhaps a few hundred people will read it. That’s a lot of pressure for those of us who’ve primarily written for other academics. Perhaps this fear is the reason I’ve moved to writing about horror films. Those of us blocked from the academy have to build our own credibility, one book at a time. Reading the proofs, although already dated, I find myself liking this book. It was fun to write, and it has a good message, I think. Even prestige presses know that books about horror films are of popular interest. As I read through where my mind was in days stretching back before the nightmare of Trump, I see that I had only just started on this path. Before me are the proofs of that.
Feeling somewhat between a state of self-pity and that of a salmon who couldn’t find his way upstream, I turned to horror. The weekend before Thanksgiving has traditionally been AAR/SBL weekend for me. I missed the Annual Meeting a few times due to unemployment, but for the most part I have been there every year since 1991. As the representative of a publisher it is an endurance-testing event. I had half-hour meetings scheduled all day on Saturday, Sunday, and today, and even a couple for the much neglected Tuesday morning. Then I found myself home, awaiting a suitcase delivery. United Airlines couldn’t say where the bag would be, and it only arrived Saturday night. My wife had to work all that day, and so I turned to my boyhood. Saturday afternoon was monster movie time.
For my current book project I’m discussing the components of The Conjuring diegesis. I’m also trying to do some traditional research on the films. Airport-lagged (I hadn’t been on a jet, but at my age being awake so late and sleeping so poorly has its own consequences), I pulled out Annabelle and Annabelle: Creation. I wondered what it would be like to see them in the order of their plots rather than their actual chronological order. Would the story hold together? Would I find anything new? The films discussed in my books are those I’ve watched many times—what I like to call “guilty pleasure research.” Or just a boyhood Saturday afternoon revisited. I couldn’t leave the house since I was told my bag couldn’t just be dropped on the porch.
From the beginning the story of Annabelle, the “possessed doll,” takes many twists and turns. The demon is invited into the spooky toy by distraught parents after the tragic death of their child. It then takes over an orphan who is adopted by a couple that she murders, as their natural daughter, in the earlier installment. The doll is possessed in that telling because the girl Annabelle had joined a Satanic cult, like Charles Manson’s, and her blood dripped into the doll as she lay dying. After claiming another female victim, the doll is sent to a couple of nurses as a present, where she appears at the opening of The Conjuring. The story shifts with each sequential telling, leaving the binge viewer dissatisfied. I haven’t had time for a double-feature since moving this summer. Thick snow still covered the ground and the sky held that solemn haze of late November. My colleagues were discussing erudite topics in Denver, and I was home using horror as therapy. If you’re curious for further results, the book will be out in a couple of years. Be sure to look for it at AAR/SBL.
Posted in Books, Just for Fun, Memoirs, Monsters, Movies, Popular Culture, Posts
Tagged AAR/SBL, Annabelle, Annabelle: Creation, Monster Boomer, The Conjuring, United Airlines
“Remember, remember the fifth of November,” begins the parable V for Vendetta before opening on a government not unlike our own. Fascist, built on hatred, an angry white man speaks for the few who worship nothing but power and call it God. Tomorrow is election day, and V can also stand for Vote. Two years ago our nation awoke in shock. Since that day we’ve seen hate crimes transform from illegal to commendable as Neo-Nazis are described as very fine people and those who actually do the labor for the nation have been disenfranchised so the uber-wealthy can have tax cuts. Violence isn’t the answer, but voting can be. As soon as the GOP sensed it might lose, it began voter suppression measures. They have never watched V.
The hope for any democracy rests in the volition to vote. We have to be willing to inconvenience ourselves to get to the polling station tomorrow for an outcome that will decide the fate of this nation. We’ve had “fake news” spewn out at every fact that is distasteful. Open, bald-faced lies backed up by sycophantic adoration of a non-charismatic hater—well, have you watched V for Vendetta? Graphic novels, it turns out, can indeed be prophetic. And since there are other nations out there that look to emulate the land of Amerigo Vespucci’s legacy. We have forgotten what it was like to be a colony. Instead we prefer following blind leaders—those who can’t understand that hateful words lead to hateful deeds. Those who can’t understand that a terrorist can be an elected official.
I’m describing V for Vendetta, of course. The coincidence of the Roman numeral five and the word “Vote,” however, hasn’t been lost on me. I’ve talked to those displeased with the results of election day two years ago who hadn’t gone to vote. What we see as V designs his intricate plan is that the will of the people still matters. But for your will to be known, you must use your voice; you must vote. Or be victims of our own system. We’ve had two years to see what damage can be done—a constitution treated as a napkin and due process subverted in order to ensure ill-gotten gain. Vivid colors have been used to stain this canvas. We don’t often receive a chance to correct imbalances but there’s a lot at stake this time. If you doubt me, at least watch V for Vendetta and remember that parables are, by definition, true.