The other day I was in one of those stores where everything is sold really cheaply.I figure it helps balance out all those times when I’ve been overcharged for things at other stores because I was pressed for time and needed something quickly.In any case, these dollar store establishments have a constantly rotating stock, it seems (things move at a buck!), and so you might or might not find exactly what you’re looking for.While just looking around, acquainting myself with the content, I came upon a shelf of Bibles.God’s word for a dollar a pop.This isn’t a place I’d normally come looking for books.Then it occurred to me: many of those who shop in such stores are committed to a faith that keeps them in their economic bracket.
That suspicion was confirmed by other items at the store.Many of them were Christian-themed.This seemed like the opposite of the prosperity gospel.People trying to scrape by, to shave enough off the budget to make it to another paycheck.Many Americans live like this.Many of them support Trump.Selling the Bible to them cheaply definitely involves a mixed message.There’s indeed a message, as I’ve learned in the publishing, in the way books are priced.Getting a thousand-pager printed where the unit cost is below a dollar requires a massive print run.Someone knows that Bibles sell.You won’t find such cheap divine revelation at Barnes and Noble.The same content, maybe, but not at the same price point.
The economics of cheap Bibles contains a message.Those who can’t afford much can be guided toward spending some of it on the Good Book.While just reading the Bible may indeed bring comfort to those who know where to look, as a whole this book requires major interpretative work.As I’ve been indicating over the last several days, Holy Writ is not nearly as straightforward a reading experience as many suppose it to be.Trying to figure out what Nehemiah’s differences with Sanballat the Horonite have to do with the rest of us isn’t an easy task.To find out, if the internet doesn’t give us quite all the knowledge we want or need, can require some intensive study, up to and including seminary.Even then you might not get it.Studying the Bible requires further commitment than simply picking one up for a Washington might imply.But then, it costs less than a lottery ticket. And you can get it while saving money on other things you need.
Maybe like me you’ve read some arguments based on chapter and verse.I should mention that I mean chapter and verse in the Bible.The typical scenario will go like this: Genesis (say) uses this word three times in chapter 38.The case then often slips to making a point on the number of instances a word or phrase occurs within a circumscribed set of verses.(The actual word doesn’t matter—this is a thought experiment.)When I ran into an example of this a few days ago a thought occurred to me: chapters and verses are later additions to the biblical text.They were never part of the original and were only added because Bible readers got tired of saying “That part in Genesis where…”In other words, chapter and verse are artificial means of interpreting the Bible.They’re very useful for taking quotes out of context.
I used to tell my students that you have to think carefully about what is the Bible and what isn’t.As a culture where the book has instant recognition, we tend to think of that discrete unit of pages and cover as coming from one person—the author.In reality most books (I can’t speak for the self-published) are the work of several people.Just like it takes a community to raise a child, it also takes one to assemble a book.That includes the Good Book.Not everything between the covers is sacred text.I’m pretty sure about that since as I was glancing through the latest edition of the New Oxford Annotated Bible I found my own name in the Preface.As much as I’d like to claim otherwise I’m not exactly biblical.
Modern ways of looking at ancient texts require a degree of facility in understanding how God’s scribes of yesteryear went about their work.While early experiments in binding books may go back close to the time when the latter parts of the Bible were being written, the scroll—without chapter and verse—contained only the words of the text.Most ancient manuscripts in Greek, anyway, didn’t even bother to put spaces between the words.That leaves some room for ambiguity in among all those letters.The Bible is a complex book with a complex history.We do it a disservice as modern readers treating it as a modern book.If you read Scripture online, or via electronic media, an even further layer of interpretation has been added.That’s why we still need Bible scholars tangled somewhere in this world-wide web.
A recent post of mine on the United Methodist Church got a lot of response (for me, anyway) on other social media.As I pondered this—I’ve written about the topic many times before—it occurred to me that most people probably have no idea what biblical scholars do all day.(That is, besides write books that only other biblical scholars read, and teach their classes, or, very occasionally, edit books.)Biblical studies is arguably one of the oldest academic pursuits in the world and what it boils down to in a word is “contexts.”We try to understand the multiple contexts of the biblical texts.Think about this a second: when you pick up a book, newspaper, magazine, or their electronic equivalents, what is the first, if often unconscious, thought you have?Isn’t it something like “what kind of book, newspaper, etc., is this?”Is it fiction or non?Is it reputable or not?Who wrote it and when?These are all contexts.
The Bible was written about two millennia ago.Very little of that original context still remains.In fact, none of the original manuscripts even still exist.It was a book written in Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek.The vast majority of people in the western world do not read these languages, and so the Bible comes to us in mediated form—translation.Translation, as any writer knows, is a form of interpretation.It is not, and can never be, the original.To figure out what the Bible “means” it has to be interpreted—even just reading it is a form of interpretation.Biblical scholars want to be able to interpret it in informed ways.We learn about its various contexts and use them to help us understand.
What did people think like thousands of years ago?Can you even remember what it was like to look up a distant location without the internet?Writing letters or dialing a rotary phone to get information on it?Going to triple A to get maps?And all of that was only two decades ago.Life in biblical times was very different than life today.The people then didn’t understand science the way that we do.The writers of the Good Book didn’t have any idea that what they were scribbling would one day be considered holy scripture.They had completely different contexts.Whether the contexts are historical, literary, or social scientific (we still haven’t figured out an elegant way of saying the latter) biblical scholars use a variety of methods to get to those contexts.We can’t go in with the answers already in our heads—if we did we’d only find what we were looking for.At the end we have an answer, not “the” answer.And so biblical studies continues.
“Common tyrants, and public oppressors, are not intitled to obedience from their subjects.”The words aren’t mine, nor are they from this century.That, however, makes them no less true.Jonathan Mayhew was an eighteenth-century clergyman arguing that Bible’s admonition to obey government officials did not apply to those who abused power.In reading these words I felt a sense of loss in a very basic way.No, I’m not a fan of turning back the clock—it can’t really be done anyway—but when the word of a single book was not disputed those tempted to follow tyrants could be made to justify it with a Good Book that could also be used to refute it.We no longer have a common frame of reference, but tyrants still exist.
Shouting matches have been substituted for discussions because those who support tyrants can’t see how they are also being oppressed.It’s one of the ironies of history.This internet age has only found a way of magnifying people’s differences on the political scale, even as it has brought us to the common marketplace of culture.Who doesn’t use Amazon?Tyranny, by definition, is the arbitrary use of power.One might think of, oh, declaring a national emergency when none exists just to get what one wants.One might think of surrounding oneself with criminals against the nation just to get what one wants.One might think of business practices meant to ruin others just to get what one wants.There seems to be a common theme here and it’s one on which the Bible has a great deal to say.The only Scripture that gets quoted is that which supports tyranny, eh, Mayhew?
When the debate was about the Good Book we were largely all on the same page.Not all colonials wanted to break with King George III.Some profited from the connection.Others thought Holy Writ prevented revolutions rather than inspiring them.Tyrants have always been with us.You’d think that with all the media we have these days that we’d be able to spot one fairly easily.The camera, however, has a way of giving the lie to the Good Book.Anyone can say they read it.Or claim they obey it.Its own test seems to be “by their fruits you will know them.”The words aren’t mine.They’re from a distant century past.But it seems the fruit is dying on the tree, even as spring begins.
As someone always interested in origins, I reflect on how I’ve ended up the way I have.I mean, who plans to end up a Bibles editor?In the grand scheme of a universe with a sense of humor, it’s an odd job.I grew up reading the Bible, but lots of people do.Most of them end up with ordinary people jobs.Obviously, working on a doctorate in the field is admittedly strange, but then, my interests have always been to get to the truth.The other day I spotted a book on my shelf—the book that arguably started it all.The Lost Books of the Bible and The Forgotten Books of Eden.These days I would recognize this for what it is, a cheap reprint of a book published quite some time ago (1926 and 1927).No “value added content.”Just a reprint.But why did this book have such influence?
It was the first time I’d realized—and growing up in poverty with parents lacking college educations you have to teach yourself a lot—that there were other books about as old as the Bible.The idea fascinated me.Somehow my fundamentalist upbringing had convinced me the Bible was the first book ever written—after all, its author was God and how much more primordial can you get?Now this particular book (Lost Books of the Bible etc.) contains some apocryphal Gospels.Not having a strong grasp on the concept of canon, I wondered why these books had been excluded, or, to use the title conceit, “lost” and “forgotten.”In college I would learn about the canonical process.I’d hear more about it in seminary.There I would learn that even older sources existed.In the pre-internet days, in a rural town without so much as a public library, how would you find out about such things?
Helmer Ringgren’s Israelite Religion captured my imagination in seminary.Even there, however, nobody on the faculty seemed to know much about what had come before the Bible.Harrell Beck told us of ancient Egypt in our classes, but clearly there were further depths to plumb.I learned about James Pritchard’s Ancient Near Eastern Texts, which I bought at the Harvard Divinity School bookstore.Other texts went back beyond Holy Writ.Just how far would have to wait until the University of Edinburgh.I sometimes wonder if I might’ve taken a different turn here or there had anyone been able to answer my young, unformulated questions about the origins of the Bible and other ancient books.Now we just have to ask the internet.
Dystopia reading and/or watching may be more practical than it seems.History often reveals authors who may be accused of pessimism more as prophets than mere anxious antagonists.Two books, according to the media, took off after November 2016.One was George Orwell’s 1984,and the other was Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale.I’d read both long before I started this blog, but I recently asked my wife if she’d be interested in seeing the movie of the latter.While teaching at Rutgers, I had a 4-hour intensive course and to give students a break from my lecturing I’d have us discuss Bible scenes from secular movies.The Handmaid’s Tale was one of them.Watching it again last night, I realized the problematic nature of Holy Writ.
The Handmaid’s Tale is a movie (and novel) that involves what I call “Bible abuse” in Holy Horror.That is to say, the Bible can be used to oppress rather than to liberate.To cause human suffering instead of eliminating it.Sure, to make Atwood’s dystopia work a future catastrophe of fertility has to occur, but the military state, the assumed superiority, and the will to control on the part of men are all too real.We’ve witnessed this in the United States government over the past two years.A lot more has been revealed than personal greed—that side of human nature that quotes the Good Book while doing the bad thing.In the movie it’s literally so, while our “leaders” are only a metaphoric step away from it.Although it’s not horror, it’s a terrifying movie.I still have trouble watching The Stepford Wives.Why is equality so easy in the abstract, but so difficult when it comes to actual life?
Aggression is not a social value.This is perhaps the most ironic aspect of using Scripture to enforce oppressive regimes.The whole point of the New Testament is self-denial for the sake of others.That may be why the only Bible reading in the movie comes from the Hebrew Bible, the story of Jacob and Rachel.Although this isn’t one of the traditional “texts of terror,” to borrow Phyllis Trible’s phrase, it nevertheless illustrates the point well.A culture that values women only for their reproductive capacities is dystopian to its very core.When a book, no matter how holy, is divorced from its context it becomes a deadly weapon of blunt force.Atwood moves beyond Orwell here—the government that sees itself as biblical can be far more insidious that one that only weighs evil on the secular scale. Not only the Bible ends up being abused.
There’s a weird silent time, after a book is published, when you start wondering how it’s doing.Holy Horror was apparently released November 29, and published December 29, if done according to standard publishing practice.The release date is when stock is received in the warehouse.The book is printed and technically available, but not yet published.Publication is about a month later when the sellers, distributors, etc., have received their orders and can begin sending them out.Publishing, as I’ve noted before, is a slow business.Somewhere around this point you start wondering how your book is doing.Reviews take some time to appear.The publisher falls silent (I know this from the editorial perspective as well).You start thinking, did it really happen?
This is the internet syndrome.We’ve become used to instant results and it’s difficult to believe that can get by without minute-by-minute updates.The problem is publishing is slow.Reading a book takes time.Not all readers review.It’s perhaps the kind of malaise you expect in late winter.In my case, however, my book was an autumn book that missed its release date by a few months.Yes, hardcore horror fans are still chomping at the bit for upcoming features like Us, but the public in general is well on its way to Valentines Day and what comes after.We are pretty much a holiday-driven culture and Holy Horror was a Halloween book released after Christmas.That, and the combination of Bible and horror is unexpected, with many, I’m guessing, thinking the book is something it isn’t.
Often at work I ponder how publishing has changed, even if it runs like sap in January.Professional writers—those who lived from their books alone—used to be rare.Most authors were otherwise employed, and many of them worked in publishing.It stands to reason when you think about it.I’ve worked for three publishers and finding other writers is, and has been, a rarity.Instead editorial boards consist of people who largely don’t have the experience of writing a book of their own talking about author expectations.A disconnect has emerged where writers find employment in other industries and find themselves wondering why publishers do things the way they do.Even with that background knowledge, I do wonder how my little book is doing.It’s only natural.And now that we’ve progressed to February, it’s only eight months more until October.