My sci-fi roots may be showing, but when John W. Morehouse posted a story on TheoFantastique’s Facebook page about Dune, I had to follow up.The story was from Wired magazine, and the title asks “Should There Be a Religion Based on ‘Dune’?”Although I grew up on Poe, science fiction was my favorite genre as a kid.Frank Herbert’s classic was published when I was only three, but it was experiencing a resurgence before the movie came out.Dune wascomplex world building.It was immersive, and compelling.The movie, I felt, didn’t do it justice.I’m not surprised that people are now wondering if it shouldn’t become a religion.Other sci-fi-based religions do exist.Star Wars and Avatar have both developed fan bases that consider the films their religion.
Movies have a way of becoming part of our reality.The other day I was reflecting on how much my frame of reference for life is based on movies.I quote from them frequently.I draw wisdom, and sometimes just plain inanity from them.But I remember them.I spend a lot more time reading than I do watching movies.If a book is engaging I’ll remember it well, but it isn’t unusual to forget—although I hope it’s still there somewhere in deep storage—a book that failed to make much of an impact.I suppose that’s true of movies too, but I recall my first viewing of The Jungle Book in theaters.How those hypnotic snake eyes scared me!And there was a film whose title I can’t recall, but I remember it was vignettes of Hans Christian Andersen stories, I believe.One was called “The Tinderbox.”I still remember it well although I was probably about five when I saw it and I never watched it again.
This staying power of movies suggests their religious potential.People today, I suspect, are less concerned with the antiquity or bona fides of a religion than they are with the practical issue of whether or not it works for them.Does it bring them near some sense of transcendence?While the Wired article doesn’t seriously suggest a religion based on Dune, I sometimes ponder how the wisdom of ancient religions is often entombed in forms and structures that “true believers” mistake for the actual essence of the religion itself.Sci-fi based religions reach for the newly created realms of transcendence.They are filled with wonder.But it will only be a matter of time before that awe fades into arguments about which canonical version is literally true.It’s happened before.
A story in Discover back in December discusses cave drawings from Indonesia.Dating back almost 40,000 years before the creation of the world, these cave paintings represent the oldest yet discovered.The interesting thing about such cave art is the representation of figures—both human and animal—that are instantly recognizable.Scientists studying the art are able to identify likely species, but, as John Morehead pointed out on his Theofantastique Facebook post, there are also fantastical beasts.We might call them monsters.It’s interesting to see how scientific writers shift from their awe at life-like illustration to a nearly palpable embarrassment when the creatures become mythical.Indeed, the article itself suggests such figures point to a very early sense of either fiction or spirituality.The monstrous and religion have long trod parallel paths and we are only now beginning to explore the implications.
Monsters are beings over which we have no control.They don’t abide by human rules and often the only recourse against them is religious.When monsters come knocking, it’s often wise to drop to your knees.Or at least reach for your crucifix.Many rationalists like to claim that human civilization developed without religion.The discoveries at sites such as Göbekli Tepe gainsay that assessment, indicating that humans first gathered for religious reasons and agriculture and all the rest followed from that.Perhaps they came together for fear of monsters?That’s only a guess, but I recall the defensive tower of Jericho.The archaeologist lecturing us as we stood by this neolithic structure asked “What were they afraid of?”He never answered that question.
Bringing monsters into the discussion isn’t an attempt to make light of these significant discoveries.Rather, we need to learn to appreciate the fact that monsters are serious business.Religion, whether or not literally true, is important.Civilization has been running the opposite direction for some time now.When surveys emerge demonstrating that the vast majority of the world’s population is still religious, analysts frown.It does make me wonder, however, if nature itself programs us this way.To other sentient creatures who experience us as predators, humans must look monstrous.We come in a variety of colors and textures (clothing), we smell of deodorant, shampoo, soap, aftershave, or none of the above.We emit strange sounds (our music).Are we not the monsters of the natural world?And should animals develop religion, would we not be one of the causes?It’s just a guess, but I need to sit in my cave and think about it for a while.
The blog Theofantastique started a couple of years before this one.I remember that sense of childhood wonder that flooded me when I first saw its posts about books and movies with monsters—the kinds of things l always liked to read and watch.But it was more than that.This particular blog presents the very tangible connection between religion and horror.Not only horror, though.As the title indicates, this is a place for genre fiction of three closely related kinds: science fiction, fantasy, and horror.The three are separated by mere degrees of semantics, and all three play very near to the third rail we call religion.In my way of thinking, horror is probably the closest of the three, but I shift among this secular trinity and often wonder in which genre I am at the moment.
For someone who grew up being taught that religion was all about history—including a history of the future, mapped, plotted, and planned just as carefully as a summer vacation—seeing the connection with genres that are all acknowledged to be fiction was, at first, a little shocking.I’d been taught in literature classes that genre fiction wasn’t really literature at all.“Pulps” were printed on cheap paper because, as you might again guess from the name, they weren’t worth much.Many of those books are now collectors’ items and cost a pulp mill to purchase.My list of books from my childhood that I’d like to recover has me looking with some worry toward my bank book.The thing is, these are often insightful statements about religion.
Monsters were always a guilty pleasure for me.Being small, shy, and insecure, it was easy to understand things from the monster’s point of view.And very often religion was implicated.Sitting in my apartment in New Jersey, at times unemployed, I began to explore the connection between religion and horror.I thought I was the only one.Eventually I discovered kindred souls, and soon came to understand that monsters are perhaps the purest representations of what religion can do.Even after writing two books about this subject, Theofantastique is a place unlike any other I know.It has far more readers than I ever will, but this isn’t Godzilla v. Mothra.No, we’re all in this together.And we’re gathered together for one purpose.In any other circumstances you’d say it was religious.
“Since childhood I’ve been faithful to monsters. I’ve been saved and absolved by them because monsters are the patron saints of our blissful imperfections.” Guillermo del Toro’s quote came to me via my colleague John W. Morehead’s wonderful Theofantastique (actually its Facebook page).I get the sense that those of us in the field of teratology parallel play a lot.At least I console myself that way because so few monster sites link to my blog.Nevertheless, I have great respect for del Toro and his drive to bring monsters into the mainstream.His quote, however, hits upon a central theme of what I try to do here and elsewhere—reflect on what monsters have to do with religion.
Notice the religious language (obviously intentional): faithful, saved, absolved, patron saints.Monsters are indeed self-reflections, and they play on the same field as religion does.Often at the same time.Religion, even in the best of circumstances, entails fear.If everything were fine all the time, what need would we have of it?Instead, aspects of life we don’t cherish or anticipate come at us.Winter comes far sooner than we expected.Monsters lurk in that brief season between summer and winter, that autumn of the soul.They know us quite well.Our weaknesses are evident to them.But as del Toro notes, they absolve.And more readily than any Episcopalian.The religion of monsters is fierce and forgiving.When we watch them on the screen, we’re watching the drama of, in del Toro’s nomenclature, salvation.If we didn’t require saving, again, why would we need religion (or monsters)?
Being faithful to monsters again bears comparison with the divine.Should you become one of the lost while the 99 don’t require any assistance, your monsters will come find you.In fact, that’s what they most specialize in.What are dark nights of the soul without a little company?It’s not sacrilegious to map the divine world with that of monsters, for any language regarding such high stakes beings must be metaphorical.Our standard version of God is often a large human.Generally he’s male, and he doesn’t always display compassion, although capable of doing so.Monsters may be creatures of our own imaginations.They are cast large on the screen since they too stand in for those to whom we owe some tribute for this is not a safe world in which to raise your kids.Guillermo del Toro understands; we should listen.
Two times.In my “professional” life I’ve been interviewed only twice (not counting, of course, far too many job interviews).The first time was as a talking head for Nashotah House.This was in the days before the internet really caught on, so it was done in DVD format.If you come over to visit I’ll dig it out and we can have a good laugh.The second occasion was much more fun.Although I write about horror a lot, I don’t mention Theofantastique nearly enough.Back in the days when I started blogging, I discovered this site that featured all kinds of interesting stuff on religion and horror (and actually on all kinds of genre pop culture).I always enjoyed the insights and got more than a few books for my own research and reading from tips I found there.
When I finally got brave enough to contact John W. Morehead, the curator of the blog, we both quickly realized we had some things in common.John very kindly offered to post an interview with me on Theofantastique about Holy Horror.It’s live now and it was really fun to talk to an actual person about my book.You see, I work alone.I knew that, leaving the classroom, I was departing my chosen career.On those high school aptitude tests they told me that I should be an entertainer.What professor isn’t?I pity their students if they’re not.I’ve been posting videos on YouTube for a few weeks now.It’s immediately obvious how much having a live audience helps.
Unfortunately, Holy Horror isn’t exactly priced to move.In fact, local bookstores have turned me down for free presentations based on the price alone.It is, however, a fun book to read.At least I intended it that way.When life give you horror, make Bloody Marys, I guess.By the way, John has been coming out with some interesting books also.I posted on his The Paranormal and Popular Culture recently.Theofantastique is often the place where I first learn of new horror films (I don’t get out much) and new books that I should read.Of these two things there’s never a shortage—horror is a thriving genre—and talking about why you wrote a book helps to clarify things a bit.Horror may seem a disreputable genre to many, but it has redeeming values.To hear about them, please watch the interview.