Empty Pews

An insightful op-ed piece by Robert D. Putnam and David E. Campbell in yesterday’s paper asked the question “why youths are losing their religion.” The authors, professors at Harvard and Notre Dame, respectively, answer with the suggestion that religion and politics just don’t mix. The truism that religion and politics are taboo subjects of polite conversation was widely accepted in my younger years. During the Reagan campaigning era, however, it became clear that some unprincipled louts were drawing religion into the political mix to garner votes. Those who actually research Reagan’s religious convictions are often surprised to find that they are not as “George W. Bush” as everyone thought. It was a ploy, and a vastly successful one at that. A new avenue had been paved, however, for hotly contested elections: use the Bible. The fawning attitudes of many Americans toward the Bible they seldom read is a powerful political tool.

Putnam and Campbell note that adults coming of age in the 1990s and later have been alienated by this paring of religion and politics. The results have tended to be the rejection of organized religion that is seen as hypocritical and intolerant. The interesting factor is that it is the political agenda that is hypocritical and intolerant, but organized religion is paying the price for going along with the Ralph Reeds, Jerry Falwells, and Pat Robertsons of the early religious right. One guy from an old book once said something like “what you sow you also shall reap.” The political use (abuse) of religion has only and always been about power.

The authors are able to provide statistics to back up their models, but their reasoning is clear enough on its own. Some of us have experienced first hand the ugly, hideous agenda behind the angelically smiling evangelistic face. Those who hold to it may be naïve enough to believe that it is actually religion that they are serving, but the sad truth is their positions are cravings for power. There are those who actually relish the days of imperial Christianity when, despite its Roman Catholicism, the church made Europe tremble. They forget that pilgrims and colonists moved to this land to flee such tyranny. Americans, reluctant to elect Roman Catholics to the presidency because of the latent fear of a hierarchical religion — so close to kingship — now bow down before political rulers in religious garb. Decidedly Protestant. And the Tea Party continues to crank out candidates who do not even realize that the separation of church and state is a founding principle of this nation. If there is a backlash coming, it is a well deserved one indeed.

6 thoughts on “Empty Pews

  1. I think it is just a natural result of the Enlightenment. With time, more and more people no longer turn to the supernatural for answers. Plus, if you think about it, the IBM PC was only brought to the public in 1983 or 1984. For many years the number of people that used computers was relatively small in the big picture. But with the explosion of mobil devices, everyone is now using technology. And since technology is based on reason rather than the supernatural, younger kids are growing up actually with a “hands on” experience of science, not just having it be something they experience in science class. Finally, advances in psychology and neuroscience are breaking new frontiers even to areas of experience that were once thought to be unquantifiable. Discoveries of things like mirror neurons, and other advances have moved some of the sciences into knowledge areas that would have been crazy to think we would be learning.

    Compared to that, a supernaturalistic religion created in the iron or bronze age I think just inevitably move towards thought similar to how we know see ancient Egyptian and Summarian religions.

    Cheers! RichGriese@gmail.com


  2. I wonder if the rise of the Tea Party is simply a reaction to having a liberal, black man elected president. It could be evidence of racism and bigotry that are still deeply embedded our national subconscious.


  3. Steve,

    Actually, the religion card was first played by Jimmy Carter. In those days it wasn’t a given that the evangelical vote would go Republican. It was only during the dark days of the Reagan era, with the turning of the US to a conservative thinking that two became firmly allied—much to the dismay of many people (myself included).



    • Steve Wiggins

      Thanks, James! I can always count on you to set me straight. I’ll claim clemency because I was too young to notice this during the Carter administration. Although, that being written, I probably wouldn’t have objected at the time anyway. The years bring wisdom, or so they say.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.