Divorced from Doctrine

Spirituality and religion have never been so far apart while being so close together. While many people describe themselves as non-spiritual in any sense, whether it be for materialist, humanist, or atheist sensibilities—a great number of people still feel the compulsion to believe in something more than the everyday world we all know. In Sunday’s New Jersey Star-Ledger columnist John Farmer laments the disparity that continues to persist between women’s opportunities to benefit from religious dictates while religious leadership continues to remain a male preserve. As Farmer notes, it is a thinly disguised case of men determining what options are open to women. He notes the recent government about-face exempting religious organizations from the new health plan as a case in point. Does the mewling. special pleading of Catholics oh so concerned about the rights of unborn males outweigh the right of women to unfettered healthcare? You betcha!

Election-year politics are among the most ripe for those who wish to keep women “in their place.” Appear too progressive and you’ll lose the Catholic vote for sure. Of course, despite officially teaching that evangelicals are not real Christians, Catholics will be glad to glom onto their votes, taking advantage of their Hell-bound compatriots in order to keep women from ever truly enjoying freedom. The theology behind their reasoning is late and based on such convoluted logic that a layman can’t hope to follow it. Isn’t it just easier to accept that Rome declares it so? One gets the sense that longing for the old Roman Empire isn’t as rare as good-old human compassion.

Does it not seem ironic that anytime a bill comes forward to promote true equality among humankind the first to stand it line to bring it down are the religious? Christianity likes to trace itself back to Jesus who never intimated that women were inferior and who never spoke a word about homosexuality. He did, however, advocate free health care. Church leaders long since discovered that the first stone is easy to throw, and after that the others come with even more celerity. The cost to spirituality, however, has never been calculated. The same church that consistently declares sexuality is only for reproduction has never made a public outcry against Viagra. After all, we must leave some room for miracles.

These keys were made for lockin'

3 thoughts on “Divorced from Doctrine

  1. In view of your concern for women, it is interesting to note that in polls the happiest women time and time again are Conservative, Evangelical Wives. Apparently, Conservative, Evangelical Husbands make pretty good decisions about dealing with women.

    Like

  2. karengentle7man

    another gem, Steve…. and something that needed to be said. so …. male, conservative members of congress…and celibate, cloistered males are opposed to insurance plan coverage providing contraceptives as part of a prescription plan …. for WOMEN … but have zero qualms about those same insurance plans offering Viagra … for MEN.

    funny how many of those very same men will then be against providing material or medical care and support for a child of a woman of limited means who becomes pregnant, and is sometimes forced to drop out of the workforce for a time to care for that child.

    anti contraceptive? so how many of those same congressmen do you see taking into their own mansions or adopting the children born into poverty in this country? precious few. if any.

    Like

  3. Landon

    I’m calling shennanigans on that claim, Jane. Aside from the fact that there are other plausible explanations for that result, I don’t think any such results exist, at least not from any reputable polling service. Citation, please.

    Like

Leave a reply to karengentle7man Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.