Seems Reasonable

Florida is a state of contrasts. A news story from the Associated Press highlights that divergence. On the lawn of the Bradford County courthouse is a monument to the Ten Commandments that American Atheists sued, unsuccessfully, to have removed. In response to their legal defeat, they have placed their own monument to atheism alongside it. Well, what’ fair’s fair. Local reaction, according to the story, has been anything but positive. Nevertheless, I wonder what a monument to atheism must look like. The partial photographs reveal the atomic symbol-based American Atheists logo on top, and words on the sides. The monument, the story indicates, bears quotes from Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, John Adams, and Madalyn Murray O’Hair, the last of whom was gruesomely murdered as an early martyr to the atheist cause. There are those who suggest that the atomism of Democritus in the fifth century BCE already tolled the death knell of the gods. Deities and very small particles, however, have continued to get along for the past 2500 years.

Ephesians_2,12_-_Greek_atheos

David Silverman, the current president of American Atheists, is quoted as saying the monument is an attack on Christian privilege, not Christianity. This may seem a fine point, but it is valid. Most reasonable atheists have no difficulty granting freedom of religious belief to anyone (only the more radical members of the atheist camp suggest religion ought to be stamped out). Does that mean governments should not display monuments to Moses’s magnum opus but not to, say, that of Lao Tzu? Or, perhaps in this instance, Lucretius? It might appear to be over-protesting, but what would a Hindu’s thoughts be, should s/he be ushered past the statutes of a foreign god on the way to court?

One of the most difficult things for a person to do is envision their normal as another person’s weird. Religions that seem perfectly logical to those raised within them have a way of seeming unbelievable to those who encounter them as a part of an exotic culture. To me it is difficult to suppose anyone would see American culture as “exotic.” I mean, we’re talking Wal-Mart and MacDonald’s here. It seems pretty ordinary to me. When I take a mental step back a little further, however, I begin to see a nation of widely varying traditions. Little pockets of true culture punch through the plastic here and there, and the light that shines through can be brilliant at times. And if you happen to run afoul of the law while visiting, you might end up in a courthouse that not only advertises the Ten Commandments, but also has a monument to humanistic spirit as well.

2 thoughts on “Seems Reasonable

  1. At the point that atheists are organizing themselves and putting up monuments to their beliefs regarding deities, Atheism has become a religion trying to establish itself in our legal system.

    Government exists to protect the power of the dominant social class. Power is defined at law in terms of property. This is true of every government system. It’s all about property and the distribution of property. Even “rights” are a form of property in the law. (Hence the difference between laws about driving and laws about the 2nd Amendment. … A discussion for another day.)

    Western property concepts derive from the Social Contract–the notion that God gave the earth to man for man to be His steward, and that when a man puts his work upon the land, stewards the land, he earns the right to call that land his own. It is a wholly Judeo/Christian concept of property, and THAT is what makes America a Judeo/Christian nation. Not whether or not there is a monument in a public place.

    And it’s OKAY to be a legally Judeo/Christian nation–and I’m talking about property and distribution concepts. Christian notions of property ownership and distribution, while at the root of the Doctrine of Discovery and the abuses it spawned, also created the largest middle class with the highest standard of living that the world has ever seen. The closest thing to widespread meritocracy–and the right and opportunity to earn our way to our positions and belongings is fundamental to American values and governmental structure. It is at the root of tolerance. Just try to find a Muslim or Atheist nation that is tolerant of diverse religions or that supports the notion of a meritocracy. Why not just say yes, we are a Judeo/Christian nation at our roots, and that’s okay? Why are we so apologetic about what we are?

    People talk about the rest of the world hating America, but I’ve never known outsiders who hate America and would tear her apart at her foundation the way Americans do. Interesting how that correlates with the growing hostility toward Christianity and the rapid influx of 3rd world belief systems and property concepts/expectations, particularly around the issue of civil rights. But that is a comment for another day. 🙂

    Like

Leave a reply to Brent Snavely Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.