Of the many ancient finds in Western Asia, none captured the imagination like the Dead Sea Scrolls.The timing and romance of the find itself, the scandals that almost immediately broke out, and the subsequent “secrecy” over the contents made the secular news.I’m convinced that a large part of the mystique has to do with the somewhat spooky name—Qumran scrolls never caught on, even though it is more accurate for many of the documents.Their discovery came after the Second World War when people were wanting good news, and, perhaps, an indication that all of this stuff was somehow predicted.Enter the scrolls.No doubt, these documents gave us quite a lot of information on the Second Temple Period—the time from the rebuilding of the Jerusalem temple in the sixth century BCE until its destruction under the Romans in the first century CE.Now the scrolls are back in the news.
A story by Nicola Davis in The Guardian announces that the origin of the scrolls is once again open to interpretation.The reason is somewhat technical—scrolls that were written on vellum (animal skins) had to be prepared for writing.One of the steps involved chemically treating the writing surface with a fine powder (the details are beyond me) so that it could be written upon.We’ve reached the point where the salts left behind can be tested for place of origin.The Guardian story notes that the Temple Scroll—one of the important non-biblical texts—was not prepared at Qumran (the site where most of the scrolls were found).That means that the scroll itself came from elsewhere, depending upon with whom you speak.The scrolls gather controversy like the Ugaritic tablets gather dust.
Part of the charm here is that there are many unanswered questions about these ancient texts.Who exactly wrote them is debated.Their find-spot suggests they were hidden away by the quasi-monastics who lived in nearby Qumran, but this doesn’t mean they necessarily wrote them.It’s still debated whether the Qumran community was made up of Essenes or not.One thing we do know about them is that they were able librarians.The scrolls themselves are symbolic of the strife in the region, having been discovered just as Israel was declared a nation.The scrolls were quickly politicized.They were kept under the auspices of a small group of academics and priests for many decades.And they still have a way of catching headlines.Even when its a matter of who powdered their faces.
It is difficult to say how an idea might grab you.I really have no idea why Washington Irving’s “The Legend of Sleepy Hollow” took my childhood imagination prisoner and has kept it stoutly locked up over all these years.Perhaps it was the Disney version seen as a child that left me with shivers of wonder akin to a species of joy.The autumnal setting, the implied ghost, the ambiguity of the final scene.I used to be as avid a philatelist as one can be in a small town, and the Sleepy Hollow stamp of 1974 held me transfixed long before I ever encountered Tim Burton’s vision of the legend.After having watched the silent Headless Horseman a couple of times, I went back to The Sketch Book of Geoffrey Crayon, Gent., and read the original again.This time I followed it up with the appendix in my edition, written a decade or two after the story by an older Irving.
The 1922 movie runs fairly close to the literary original (for the most part), especially when you add the appendix.The appendix (in the edition I have—The Modern Library, 2001) is an essay titled “Sleepy Hollow.”It reflects on Irving’s recollections of what Sleepy Hollow was like in his youth (he returned to the area to settle later in life).The village church, which features in “The Legend,” provides a source of much of his reverie and this is incorporated into the early cinematic version as well, in the Sunday morning scene.I also noticed how frequently psalmody enters the original story.The tale does not mention the Bible, but psalmody was an early form of church music, and “The Legend” has Ichabod use it when he’s afraid as well as for teaching students to sing, for a few shiny shillings.
Washington Irving is sometimes credited with the invention of the short story as a literary form.His younger contemporary Edgar Allan Poe worked in that format, and the two of them contended with making a living (the former more successfully) purely as literary writers.Irving’s spooky tales, however, often have something of the comic about them.His story-telling style uses folksy, folkloric exaggeration and humor to prevent it from becoming too dark.Poe would snuff the candle and let the fear be unhindered.I knew of Sleepy Hollow before I discovered Poe, and this recent resurgence is perhaps a way of exploring my own literary roots.It’s nearly half-way through September already, and Tarrytown beckons.
Work interferes with my concentration.I suspect I’m not alone among writers in this regard.Just last week I had two fiction pieces accepted for publication (one of which won honorable mention), but the little time I can allot to writing is divided between fiction and non.Up until now the non has been more successful at finding publishers, but last week might’ve tipped the balance a bit.As someone who works well more than eight hours daily, culling that time for creative enterprises can be difficult.I’m told that Isaac Asimov, in the days before personal computers, kept three typewriters, each with one of his projects ready to go.He would work on the one he felt like at any given time without having to reload a single typewriter with a half-finished piece.My laptop has the dubious advantage of keeping multiple windows open in which several projects are simultaneously active.
At the moment I have three book projects going; two nonfiction and one that will become novel number seven, if it ever gets finished.Not only that, but my short stories file has many contenders for my rationed time.Long ago I lost track of just how many tales there are—some are on disc and others are on paper.Some are finished, awaiting revision, and others have just begun clawing their way into written form.The problem is finding the time to work on them.The oft-heard lament of the working writer is that life is more working than writing.And having had some minor affirmation of my fictional functionality recently, I’d love to explore that a bit more, but who has time right now?Even as I finish typing up my blog post for the day the hour to begin work is looming.
Stephen King’s advice to wannabe writers is to read.A lot.Although I do my best to keep this dictate among my personal commandments, I run into the immobile object of nine-to-five-plus repeatedly.If I take a vacation (which is seldom) it is often “to get away,” but writing is more a matter of aging in place.Finding your comfortable spot where your thoughts flow freely and where the coffee pot’s just in the kitchen and if an idea catches you before sunrise you can spend time wrestling it even after light filters in through the curtains.Those are rare days since weekends are for doing the chores neglected in your forty-five-plus hour work week.And settling between fiction and non is never an easy decision, especially when one has just received a vote of confidence before login time on a Monday morning.For now, however, I have to concentrate on work.
Maybe you’ve experienced it too.The sense of change in a large city like New York is palpable.Although I don’t commute in much any more, I noticed it when I made daily treks to the city—change is constant.If the skyline’s forever evolving, on street level things are more than keeping pace.In the seven years of my daily commuting I saw buildings built and razed in the same location.Scaffolding is a constant hazard.Public art pieces are placed and then replaced.Change.I was reading about Yijing, better known as I Ching, the other day.One of the spiritual classics of China, this “Book of Changes” reflects a worldview common in eastern Asia that is quite at odds with that that developed in ancient Greece.Many Greeks believed permanence was reality, those in China who read the spiritual masters believed that change was reality.The older I get the more I think the author(s) of Yijing got it right.
I’m not an expert on the religions of southern or eastern Asia, but I have studied the major ones.To those outside the field of religious studies, it may be surprising that the field is as large as it is.In the United States alone there are an estimated 40,000 denominations, and that’s just within Christianity.To be an expert in any one takes years of study.Add in the many religions of other locations, such as Africa and Asia, and you’ve got more than one lifetime’s worth of work lined up.A common—the most common, in fact—course in collegiate religion curricula is “World Religions.”I’ve taught it myself.The problem is nobody’s an expert in all of them.Still, I found reading about what used to be called “eastern religions” (with that poisonous cultural bias that the unchanging west is the correct vantage point) full of surprises.
Scientists well into last century liked the idea of a steady-state universe.Permanence.When Edwin Hubble noticed other galaxies were moving away from ours (and, by the way, first noticed that there were other galaxies), the Big Bang theory developed to explain this motion. Change, it turns out, is constant.It may be slow at times, and at others it’s like the skyline of a major city like New York, shifting several times in a single lifespan.I’ve read some of the spiritual classics (in translation) and I always come away with a new sense of wonder about the many ways of understanding the world.And I ponder what it will take to change the attitude that religions aren’t worth studying.
Those of us who grew up Evangelical hold an unusual place among our liberal peers.We’re often able to peer around, over, and under that wall that has been built between those who want a faith-based nation and those who want a free one.Angela Denker is a fellow traveler on this road, and her book Red State Christians: Understanding the Voters Who Elected Donald Trump is a useful roadmap.Some of us fall further from the tree than others, but one of Evangelicalism’s more endearing traits, when taken seriously, is the love of those who are different from you.That love is often forgotten in the political rhetoric daily whipped into a froth by an unstable president being used by his party to install agendas that hardly fit the moniker “Christian.”That’s why books like this are so important.
I confess that reading studies such as this make me uncomfortable.Uncomfortable because my Evangelical past haunts me worse than any ghost, but also because Denker is clearly right that basic humanity is being left in the garbage as battle lines are drawn up in what could be a great, diverse nation if a leader were determined to work for unity.I recently wrote about lunar landings.Kennedy was a Catholic who had to work to bring a nation together around a common goal.Instead of tearing the country apart for his personal aggrandizement, he pointed to the moon.Sure, there was a xenophobia concerning the Soviet Union, but at least in this pocket of the world there was a sense that we should work together.When religion entered politics with Richard Nixon and his followers, a deep rift opened up.The two topics you were never to discuss—religion and politics—were now in the same bed.
Red State Christians is an extended road trip on which Denker interviews people who largely fall under the Evangelical umbrella.Some of them are Catholic.Some of them are Hispanic.Some of them are less concerned with social issues, but are hard-working laborers often overlooked by the Democratic Party.The resulting pastiche is one in which Americans are cast not in sharp relief, but rather with the hazy edges that are a far more accurate way of understanding human beings.Many, it becomes clear, elected Trump out of fear, or out of fear of his opponent.These aren’t bad people, but they are people afraid.This wasn’t an easy book to read, but it is an important one.And those who want to work for a future that might include realms beyond the moon might find this work a small step in the right direction.
In terms of cash flow I don’t fall into the wealthy bracket.My assets are largely in pre-printed paper form, and when I visit the local Little Free Library it’s generally to donate books rather than to take them.Over Labor Day weekend I was in Ithaca.One of the more famous features of the town is its weekend Farmers’ Market.Indeed, the north-south corridor through town is a continuous traffic jam during Market hours.Not only are there farm stands in the permanent open-sided structure, but there are a few craft booths and several places to buy al fresco fair from local restaurants.In the summer parking can be hard to find, but the place has a carnival-like atmosphere nevertheless.It also has a Little Free Library.I’ve been to the Market many times but I’d never noticed it before.
Upstate New York is beautiful but it tends toward the conservative end of the political spectrum.Ithaca is a pixel of blue in a screen of red, and that strangely showed in the Little Free Library.Many of the books were either Bibles or popular kinds of devotional titles.Given that Cornell isn’t known for its religion department (Ithaca College has a respectably sized philosophy and religion department, however) these books aren’t the kind you’d expect to find in an institution of higher education.That’s why I was surprised to see a near mint copy of Bart Ehrman’s The Lost Gospel of Judas Iscariot on the shelves.The Gospel of Judas hasn’t been big news for a few years now, but this was a book that suggests a different demographic than your average evangelical readership.
Like Ehrman, I once made a living as an adjunct at Rutgers University.Indeed, it was this commonality that helped me to get to know him a bit.He’s gone on to a kind of fame rare for biblical scholars.Indeed, to have a sufficient number of copies of your book printed to end up in a Little Free Library—in other words, you have to have more cachet than your garden variety Ph.D.In my local community LFL I like to leave books for others to take.Just last week I stopped by and noticed that the summer had depleted the stock.Ironically, I had noticed one of Neal Stephenson’s novels in the same circumstances as Ehrman’s.I’m glad to see intelligent works on offer for the reading public.And trading books with no money involved suggests to me that there’s a better form of economy than material greed.All it takes is a Little Free Library and a little good will.
The failure of India’sChandrayaan 2 to maintain contact, intended to make India the fourth nation to successfully conduct a lunar landing, sent me reading about the moon.I remember the first manned landing, which happened when I was six, so the idea that we could make it that far seemed less impressive than it really is, I suppose.I was fascinated by early space travel, and part of this may have been because of the moment of silence announced in school the day Apollo 13 safely returned to earth after the oxygen tank explosion that made its landing impossible.As I was reading about the many moon missions that took place before I was born, I was surprised to learn how many nations are still attempting to reach our nearest neighbor.This year alone China, Israel, and India have all attempted to land up there.
Israel’s mission called its lunar lander Beresheet.It was the first attempt to land the Bible on the moon.Beresheet is the Hebrew title of Genesis.The US missions were named Pioneer, Ranger, Surveyor, and Apollo.Ironically for the persistently religious nation, our only supernatural title was the name of a Greek deity.Israel was true to its roots with its naming convention, but there is kind of a paradox involved.In the world of the Bible the earth is the center of the universe and the moon is a quasi-living being circling about our stationary fix in this fictional view of the cosmos.That’s not to say our own views may not some day be regarded as fictional as well, but simply that we now know the view in Genesis is incorrect.
Of course, the word “genesis” can mean a purely secular beginning as well.It is a compound word that is often translated as “in the beginning.”As such, it is appropriate for the first attempt at a moon landing, or any other great venture.Still, it is instantly recognizable as the first word in the Bible, indicating a kind of strange juxtaposition where the biblical moon—which is not the same as the astronomical moon—are brought together.Unlike the book of Genesis, the moon has been reached many times by others before.The old and the new meet in this attempt to reach into space.Meanwhile our problems continue down here.Maybe that’s why we continue to attempt to reach the heavens.And in that sense, no better title applies than that of the book that somehow defies rational explanation.