I risk being seen as even more of a book nerd by addressing the topic of International Standard Book Numbers, or ISBNs.For those who’ve purchased a book in the past several decades, you’ve seen ISBNs, but perhaps unwittingly.They’re represented by a barcode, often on the back cover in the lower left corner, or sometimes the middle.The ISBN is the edition’s unique identifier, but it isn’t necessarily a guarantee that the contents will be exactly the same since typos corrected for new printings may use the same ISBN already purchased.Yes, you read right.Publishers have to purchase ISBNs.Without them listings on many websites and distributors’ lists would be impossible.The ISBN is what fulfillers use to order books since neither author nor title is necessarily unique.Many book titles have been used to the point of dullness.
A typical ISBN
A colleague recently complained to me about being able to request permission to reuse something from a book without an ISBN.Rights vendors often require them.The ISBN came into usage, however, only in 1970.As I’ve learned from trying to load older books into my Goodreads list, there are all kinds of complications and potential confusions if you don’t have the unique identifier for your source.Titles cannot be copyrighted, and many are consequently overused.The ISBN is your guide to a specific book.If the book came before the ISBN system it’s going to take some extra work to ensure that you find the correct way to identify what you’re talking about.This is only one of the many ways in which the book industry differs from most others.It’s also the reason that I generally object to corrected printings.
Perhaps it’s odd to see a publishing professional take a hard line on book content.The fact is almost always an author is given the opportunity to proofread, well proofs.The copyedited, typeset book is given to them.Yes, errors may creep in after this stage, but that’s not very common.If an author didn’t catch mistakes, then a corrected edition ought to be published with a new ISBN. But that’s not how it works.Each ISBN should indicate the exact same content.Although an ISBN must be purchased, just one isn’t expensive (witness all the self-publishing going on these days and that should be obvious).Publishers that have to buy many thousands of them, however, are disinclined to waste them.I’m not a fan of all technology, but the ISBN seems like a good concept to me.Even if it’s not a guarantee that things are what they seem.
So how much time is there?I mean all together.I suppose there’s no way to know that because we have no idea what came before the Big Bang.Those who invent technology, however, seem not to have received the memo.New tech requires more time and most of us don’t have enough seconds as it is.Perhaps in the height of folly (for if you read me you know I admit to that possibility) I’ve begun uploading material to my YouTube channel (I hope I got that link right!). These are cut-rate productions; when you’re a single-person operation you can’t fire the help.I figured if those who don’t like reading prefer watching perhaps I could generate a little interest in Holy Horror visually.(I like my other books too, but I know they’re not likely to sell.)
The question, as always, is where to find the time for this.My nights are generally less than eight hours, but work is generally more.What else is necessary in life, since there are still, averaged out, eight more left?Writing has its reserved slot daily.And reading.Then there are the things you must do: pay taxes, get physical exercise, perhaps prepare a meal or two.Soon, mow the lawn.It may be foolishness to enter into yet another form of social media when I can’t keep up with those I already have.What you have to do to drive interest in books these days!I think of it as taking one for the tribe.Readers trying to get the attention of watchers.
There’s an old academic trick I tried a time or two: double-dipping.It works like this: you write an article, and another one, and another one.Then you make them into a book.I did pre-publish one chapter of a book once, but getting permission to republish convinced me that all my work should be original.That applies to reviews on Goodreads—they’re never the same as my reviews on this blog—as well as to my YouTube videos.There’ll be some overlap, sure.But the content is new each time around.So you can see why I’m wondering about time.Who has some to spare?Brother, can you spare some time?I’ve been shooting footage (which really involves only electrons instead of actual linear imperial measures) for some time now.I’ve got three pieces posted and more are planned to follow.If only I can find the time.
The thing about reading is that it’s a lifestyle.I record books both here and on Goodreads, but I read a lot more than books.Although I don’t have much time for magazines or even newspapers, I read a lot on the web.And billboards.And sidewalks.I’m quite content doing it.One thing I’ve noticed in all this reading is that fiction writers tend to be more often cited as experts and intellectuals than do non-fiction writers.Oh the non-fic practitioners get their footnotes, and other specialists mention them, but fiction writers get analyzed, probed, and explored.Literary types wonder what they meant by some obscure doggerel they wrote.When’s the last time a non-fiction writer drew that kind of attention?It makes me wonder about all the time I’ve been spending on non-fiction lately.
I suffer from graphomania.There’s no cure.The other day I went looking for an old, pre-electric typewriter to get my fix in case the power goes out.I have notebooks, zibaldones, commonplace books.I carry one in my pocket.I have one on my bedside stand.And the thing I’ve noticed is that the ideas that come to me unbidden are often fictional.You see, I have a hidden life as a fiction writer.That persona is very poor since he’s never made any money from his writing.He was nominated for a Pushcart Prize some years ago, but he never won.That fiction writer has been suffering cabin fever because I’ve been finding publishers for my non-fiction work.I wonder, however, if maybe I shouldn’t be spending my time on fiction.It’ll never get me to the point I can make a living on it, but it might get quoted after I’m gone.
Writing, after all, is a stab at immortality.Those of us who do it are legacy builders.Even as the web has moved us more and more toward visual, iconic forms of entertainment, it has still left a few dusty corners for the written word.When I pass the sometimes impressive graffiti on the way into New York I think I know what the vandals are feeling. We’re kindred spirits. We don’t want to be forgotten.Whether with spray can, fingers on a keyboard, or fountain pen (or maybe even an old-fashioned typewriter) we are trying to say, “I was here.”I used to print out all my blog posts in case the web failed.It grew to thousands of pages.I had to stop.I was beginning to act like a fictional character.
While this blog ranges over an outdated map of my mind, one of the two common elements that hold it together is books.I don’t have many bibliophile followers, but for any who happen upon my pages, welcome.Each year at this time I look back over the year in books.I started doing this when I joined Goodreads.I don’t put every single book in Goodreads, but it’s a fair register of what I’ve been up to.This year I set a reduced goal of 65 books (I knew I’d be moving and commuting less, and I do most of my reading on the bus).Happily I ended the year with 83 officially read, but then the first five months of the year were still spent in daily commutes.
Three years ago my wife discovered the Modern Mrs. Darcy’s reading challenge.I can’t say just how much I look forward to the new year just to begin reading the books I select to meet that challenge.The reason I do this is to force myself into reading things I might not feel like reading, or often, books I’ve been putting off for some reason or another.It only amounts to a dozen books and if I can’t get through twelve in a year, something’s terribly wrong.Margaret Atwood once said something like “Show me a person who’s read a thousand books and I’ll show you an interesting person.”I didn’t really need that quote to set a goal, and I don’t think of it as bragging for readers to share their experience with books.I started getting into books in middle school, and although I didn’t keep track in those days I likely read a thousand books before I graduated from high school.Branches begin to bend to the light early on.
So, were there memorable books this year?My reading, due to contractual obligations (I brought them on myself), has tended to be dark.There were, nevertheless, spots of light.Thomas Hardy’s Jude the Obscure and Paul Bogard’s The Ground Beneath Us were early favorites.I managed to stop my ears enough to miss spoilers from Jeff Vandermeer’s wonderful Annihilation.Carl Sagan’s The Demon-Haunted World was artfully done, and Gregory Alan Thornbury’s Why Should the Devil Have All the Good Music? was a saunter down memory lane.Selections from my reading challenge fiction that I really enjoyed were Anne Tyler’s Vinegar Girl, and Emily Fridlund’s History of Wolves. And Lee Irby’s Unreliable.And and Carlos Ruiz Zafón’s The Shadow of the Wind.The last inspired non-fiction title I read was Susan Fair’s American Witches.I always appreciate suggestions, just sayin’.Reading is the balm in my personal Gilead, and I look forward to a 2019 full of books, even if I can’t keep the pace of years past.
It seems that Holy Horror is now available, although I haven’t seen it yet.According to the McFarland website it’s in stock just in time for the holidays.Those of you who know me (few, admittedly) know that I dabble in other social media.One of my connections on Goodreads (friend requests are welcome) recently noted that he does not like or watch horror.Indeed, many people fall into that category.His follow-up comments, however, led me to a reverie.He mentioned that reading the lives of the saints and martyrs was horrific enough.One of the claims I make in Holy Horror is that Mel Gibson’s Passion of the Christ is a horror film.My friend’s comment about martyrs got me to thinking more about this and my own revisionist history.
Traditionally horror is traced to the gothic novel of the Romantic Period.Late in the eighteenth century authors began to experiment with tales of weirdly horrific events often set in lonely castles and monasteries.From there grew the more conventional horror of vampire and revenant tales up into the modern slasher and splatter genres.I contest, however, that horror goes back much further and that it has its origins in religious writing.Modern historians doubt that the mass martyrdoms of early Christianity were as widespread as reported.Yes, horrible things did happen, but it wasn’t as prevalent as many of us were taught.The stories, nevertheless, were written.Often with gruesome details.The purpose of these stories was roughly the same as the modern horror film—to advocate for what might be called conservative social values.The connection is there, if you can sit through the screening.
Holy Horror focuses on movies from 1960 onward.It isn’t comprehensive, but rather it is exploratory.I’ve read a great number of histories of the horror genre—a new one is on my reading stack even as I type—and few have traced this phenomenon back to its religious roots.Funnily, like horror religion will quickly get you tagged as a weirdo.Perhaps it’s no coincidence that both goths and priests wear black.As I’ve noted before on this blog, Stephen King’s horror novels often involve religious elements.This isn’t something King made up; the connection has been there from the beginning.We may have moved into lives largely insulated from the horrors of the world.Protestants may have taken the corpus from the crucifix for theological reasons, but for those who’ve taken a moment to ponder the implications, what I’m saying should make sense.Holy and horror go severed hand in bloody glove.
One of my anxieties about moving is that commuting time was my reading time.Enforced sitting for over three hours a day meant consuming book after book.Now I have to carve out time to read.Life has a way of filling the time you have.I say the following fully aware that you’re on the internet now, but one of the biggest time drains is the worldwide web.Humans are curious creatures and the web offers to answer any and all queries.(It still hasn’t come up with a satisfactory answer to the meaning of life, however, IMHO.)Even when I’m working on my current book, a simple fact-check can lead to surfing and before I know it, I’m out to sea.That’s why books—paper books—are such a good option.A footnoted source meant another trip to the library, and libraries led to more reading.
I’m a Goodreads author.I like Goodreads quite a lot, and I actively accept new friends there.In the past I set goals of reading 100+ books per year.Aware back in January that a move might take place, I lowered my expectations.I figured, even without commuting, that 65 books would be attainable in a year.Of course, Goodreads doesn’t count the books you write, only those you read.I had to tell even Amazon Author Central that Holy Horror was my book.Moving, however, is a liminal time.Every spare minute is spent packing.And you still owe “the man” eight hours of your day.That rumble that you feel is the moving truck growing closer.Reading time has become scarce.I fear I’m becoming illiterate.
And Goodreads makes me think of Twitter.I’ll just click over there a while and wonder why I can’t seem to grow a following.Ah, it turns out that you have to tweet often and incessantly, with erudite and trenchant things to say.The birds chirping once a second outside my window can’t even keep up.Problem is, I have a 9-to-5 job, and I’m trying to write Nightmares with the Bible.And there’s just one more fact I have to check.Wait, what’s the weather going to be like today?Gosh, is that the time?I have to get packing!That moving van will be here only hours from now.I need to calm down.The way to do that, in my case, is to read a book.
My life has been about books. It was only as I became what is now known as a tween that the passion took hold, but since that time I’ve been addicted to them. As some readers know, I have a Goodreads account. Each year I try to take out a Goodreads challenge on how many books to read. That recently got me thinking; as an editor you read lots of embryonic books, but they don’t count. Being an editor’s a funny job. Not ha-ha funny, but the other kind. When I was having trouble breaking back into higher education, I ran across a quote that went something like this: What’s an editor? A writer who actually has a job. (Rimshot.) I have a tendency to take things literally, so I thought I’d discover lots of writers among professionals in the publishing world. I haven’t.
It could be that other writers keep it well hidden. I publish my fiction under a pseudonym and it may be that the other editors I know live hidden lives too. Somehow I doubt it. They check their email at midnight and all day long on weekends. One thing I know about writers is that we need time to write. If your workday is already eight hours and your commute is three-plus hours more, you won’t be checking work emails on weekends if you want to get any writing done at all. But what about the reading? Does it count when you read books that aren’t even born yet?
On Goodreads I enter my books by the ISBN. The International Standard Book Number (for which you have to pay, I’ve learned) is a tool used so that booksellers can keep track of titles with a unique identifier. The system is fairly recent (at least according to some of the books I read), and not all books have one. For those of us who read ancient documents, those can’t count either. Ilimilku didn’t think to stamp 13-digits on the bottom of his clay tablets. There’s no way to trace just how much s person reads in an actual year. I measure myself by my books. I get a profound sense of fulfillment when I finish one. That’s why I so often post about them on this blog. Books mean something. Call it a bad habit if you will. We’re outgrowing our apartment because I find it hard to part with books. There are those who spend their lives building arsenals. Then there are those who spend theirs building libraries. I know which I prefer.