The ongoing political fiasco of our nation (and within several states as well), raises a very basic issue.We trust our legislators to do what we pay them to do (they’re our employees) because they take an oath to uphold the Constitution.Problem is, liars don’t keep their word.When an elected official opts to lie pathologically rather than to tell the truth, how can we expect him (or her) to uphold an oath they took?Doesn’t lying behavior suggest that they were lying when they took that oath?A hand on the Bible means nothing if you don’t suppose God is waiting with a lightning bolt in the metaphorical Heaven described, none too clearly, in the Good Book.This is the greatest crisis a democracy can possibly face—lying leaders.
This isn’t just alarmist talk.Societies—even capitalistic ones—rely on a great deal of trust.Those who don’t mean what they say end up on the business end of the Better Business Bureau, or fail to stay solvent.There are laws that ensure you are protected if someone sells you a false bill of goods.What then, if the highest office in the land is occupied by someone who can’t be trusted?Instead of appealing to the rule of law to set such a person on the right path, the Republican (Church) Party has decided that lying is now a commandment.I may be lying, but how can you tell?If no one has the backbone to stand up and declare that the whole system has toppled, what can a nation do?An even more worrisome fact is that there’s no going back once this has happened.The Republican Church has instilled this behavior for three years and is showing no sign of repentance.
Oaths were taken very seriously in the world of the Bible.Violating one (lying intentionally) was considered the surest way to arouse God’s anger.Ironically the Republican Church, which claims to be biblically based, is, according to its own Scripture, angering God.I often consider myself a cynic, but my cynicism falls far short of this.Psychological studies have demonstrated that the average person is reluctant to outright lie when the idea of God is introduced into conversation.God’s Own Party, however, has inured itself to that minor phobia.The Good Book, after all, says God’s the father of lies, right?If they’d bother to open that book they’re thumping, I think they’d discover that that is truthfully the worst kind of blasphemy a human can utter.
Republicanism, it seems to me, has become its own religion.It started off when the GOP married evangelical Christianity, but the offspring of that unholy union has become a religion all on its own.It certainly doesn’t adhere to classical Republican principles (tariffs?Really?).Nor does it adhere to Evangelical standards (turn the other cheek?Love thy neighbor as thyself?).Like most blendings, this new religion has some elements of each parent and it has no lack of fanatic supporters.The traditional Evangelical, for example, considered the Devil “the father of lies”—one of his biblical titles.The Republican, however, considers pathological lying to be signs of messiahood.There’s a tiny disjunction here, but it proves that what we’ve got is the birth of a new religion.
Books and articles have begun to appear on how Evangelicalism has changed.I don’t believe it’s so much a matter of Evangelicalism evolving as it is Republicanism fulfilling the need for intolerant religion.In every culture there are those who want to go back to the day of Moses and golden calves and stoning those you hate.It’s a little more difficult these days, what with secular laws that protect the rights of others, but the GOP has found a way.My heart goes out to old fashioned Republicans, it really does.Fiscal conservatives have found themselves in church with a bunch of people with whom they agree on very little.They have no choice, for their political party has been sanctified.And the only thing worse than an Evangelical is a bleeding-heart liberal.Next thing you know the Democrats will start quoting the Bible at you.
The lying thing really takes some wrapping my head around, though.I’ve always said nobody believes in a religion they know to be false.This new development challenges that, if it doesn’t challenge the very idea of religion itself.Republicanism is a religion based solidly on bearing false witness.Self-aware of it, even.You can’t tell me that these educated white men don’t know a criminal activity when they see one.That they can’t read, and reason, and trust their intellect (although it takes the back seat to their overwrought emotions).Sound like a religion to you?It sure does to me.It’s been coming a long time, but it took the last three years (the tradition length of Jesus’ ministry, it’s often said) for this to dawn on me.The religion of the lying messiah.I’ve got to wonder what kind of future it’s got.I smell the fires rekindling in the burnt over district and wonder who’s for dinner.
I once knew a man who was what can only be called a pathological liar.I never knew when he was telling the truth.It was a disorienting experience relating to him because, as a literalist I wanted to believe what others told me.In this case you simply had no solid ground on which to stand.Recently someone else who knew him (he died some time ago) asked me for some information about him.I was at a loss to come up with anything.Since he seemed routinely to mix fiction liberally with fact, I didn’t know where to start.In this post-truth world we now inhabit, I fear this may become much more common.Everyone lies from time to time, but when it is a way of life, well, even Jesus had a name for the “father of lies.”
It’s with a bipartisan sense of sadness that I lament how the Republican Party has completely backed up a man that they know is like this.Intentionally or not, political leaders set the character of nations—just consider how often we think of Russia as Putin or North Korea as Kim Jong-un.America has become the nation of lies.Don’t believe me?Maybe I’m lying.See what I mean?Often I tried to figure out what this man I knew was up to.What was his endgame?I couldn’t be sure I’d ever know, even if he told me.Especially if he told me.You see, I was quite young at the time, and the young often don’t have the experience to get to the truth.And when the truth is bartered for power, well, the father of lies is lurking nearby.
Recently I finished reading M. Scott Peck’s People of the Lie.This person I knew was in my mind quite a bit as I tried to sort out all the psychology being presented.If I’m honest I know that even as a child I said this man was evil.It was clear to me that he wanted to survive on his terms or no terms.To do so, he believed his own lies.Now I don’t know if he lied at work.He had a job where many people depended upon him to carry out his tasks.He seemed to do so conscientiously.When not at work, however, he was back in the land where he felt the most comfortable, the land of untruth.Recently someone again asked me about him.I tried to recollect as much as I could, and like much of the world these days I answered, “I just don’t know.”
The problem with lying is that it generally doesn’t hold up. Eventually people will figure out that a falsehood is exactly that and the liar will be scorned. In other words, truth is determined by witnesses. This is tested and confirmed every day in our legal system. The witness is invaluable (except in the hands of lawyers). Since no one person can see everything, we rely on others to help us fill in the blanks. Think of it; when you see something unusual don’t you ask whoever’s with you “did you see that?” We witness the world around us, and unless we’re untruthful that observation becomes part of the collective narrative of what the world is like.
A story from IFL Science! sent by a friend describes “Ancient Legends And Myths That Were Later Proven True By Science.” Apparently this is part of an annual series. What the article lays out are recorded myths later confirmed by science. Scientists are trained witnesses. Taught to silo information, they separate belief (so they say) and eschew non-natural causation. They peer into the mirror each morning with Occam’s razor firmly in hand. Then everybody seems to be surprised when non-scientists have actually observed something correctly. This is the ancient bickering between religion and science—you can’t have it both ways, the reasoning goes. This is a zero-sum game. The winner takes it all. Reality, we observe, is seldom so simple. Articles like this one express surprise that non-scientists can get it right once in a while. The fact is, we’re all witnesses to what happens on this planet. Some of us are just taken more seriously than others.
Don’t get me wrong—I’m not equating religion and science. Nor am I suggesting that all people are equally good observers. It’s just that sometimes things happen when there’s no scientist in the room. Or if there is there’s no time to wire everything up appropriately. The events in the IFL Science! piece are all like this. Observed by people before science was invented—some of them before civilization was invented—events were called myths until scientists came round with their notebooks and validated the long-departed witnesses. The problem with occasional phenomena is that they don’t come on cue. The universe isn’t here to please us or satisfy our curiosity. It’s just that sometimes we see things that don’t match up with the textbook. Whether you call an exorcist or a scientist depends entirely on your point of view.