Prophets in Disguise

Yesterday I decided to take a break from austerity and take my family to see Avatar. Not just on the big screen (a rare enough treat), but in 3-D Imax format. In my zeal I had forgotten about my debilitating congenital problem with motion sickness. I have had trouble since I was a child sitting in the backseat, or riding backward on a train, or even turning my head around too fast. Once I was talked into riding a county fair ride by some high school friends and found myself still getting nauseous two weeks later. I have learned to live with this embarrassing problem, but sometimes I forget that the mere suggestion of motion will send me over the edge. I managed the first twenty minutes of the movie before having to close my eyes and bow my head for the rest of it. It is an interesting experience to listen to a movie. Following the basic plot wasn’t too hard, at least when I wasn’t thinking about all the talk of great special effects and the money I’d spent to see them.

Like most science-fiction movies, Avatar makes substantial use of biblical and mythological themes. The planet is named Pandora, after the “Greek Eve,” and I could hear traces of the hero quest throughout. When the indigenous people were introduced, however, my ears pricked up (as I understand those of the characters do). The Na’vi, it turns out, share the name of the prophets of the Bible. The Hebrew title for prophet is nb’, pronounced the same as the movie characters. I thought about this as I wondered what was going on during the action sequences that I could not see. Those who guard the traditional ways are the prophets, silenced by the grinding machinery of modernization.

Even avatars have their origins in religion. The first I had heard of avatars in science fiction was in Neal Stephenson’s Snow Crash. The idea felt so fresh then that I had to remind myself that Hinduism had given the world avatars as earthly manifestations of deities centuries ago. Placing oneself in another form ultimately stimulates the question of which is the true self, the ultimate reality. It is an inherently religious question.

The morning after, the room is still swaying about me, I can’t scroll down on the computer screen, and I am asking the questions of reality again. It cheers me that Avatar is doing so well at the box office. Any movie, even if unseen, that causes the viewer to question a frequently painful reality is worth the price of admission.

Another blue avatar

6 thoughts on “Prophets in Disguise

  1. Any movie, even if unseen, that causes the viewer to question a frequently painful reality is worth the price of admission.

    Indeed.
    The beauty of some forms of Hinduism and Buddhism is the questioning of the “true self”. Personally I think that is key to understanding the inner life.
    And, hell, I am an atheist.

    Like

    • Steve Wiggins

      Sabio,

      I’ve stumbled onto that by accident. When I was a teenager I would spend days at a time wondering if what I was perceiving was really reality. The PhD knocked it out of me for a while, but now I’m back in the zone!

      Like

  2. Enjoyed your unique take on the religious theme underpinnings. I was 50-50 after seeing the film as to whether it was worth it, but I’m satisfied having seen it once.

    BTW, IMAX increases motion-blur (that vertigo effect) because the film was shot 3D in a smaller format. It actually reduces the resolution.

    I dislike dumbed-down spirituality, but that’s my bias. Millions disagree (as would the buyers of Big Macs.)

    I wrote about the film too.

    Like

    • Steve Wiggins

      Thanks for the comment — I’ll read your review before the day is out. I glanced at it and it looks like we appreciate the same kinds of films. I’ve mentioned a few others in past posts, so feel free to browse!

      Like

  3. Apparently, the word nabi and rasool are in Arabic and refer to Messenger or what we now might call Manifestation of G-d.

    When Muslims say that Muhammed is the last prophet, they mean just one of those words… but I am not sure which one.

    There are many nabi, but only a few of those nabi are rasools. Maybe nabi are like arhats – holy souls inspired by G-d.

    A rasool or rasul is like a nabi, a holy messenger, but has a bigger message — the sharia or law. A kitab’ or book.

    I am not clear on this.

    Daniel Pipes discusses it here http://www.danielpipes.org/comments/27818

    More here:
    http://www.dartabligh.org/q_a/n.html
    http://is.gd/67c67
    http://is.gd/67cP8

    The last link is the Prophets of Islam wikipedia entry.

    It doesn’t say which one Muhammed is the last of: the nabi or the rasool.

    Did Mohammed say He was the last one.? Why would the tradition of periodic updates be discontinued? Is civilization supposed to be brought to a standstill or to such a high level of perfection and no longer be in need of guidance?

    Like

    • Steve Wiggins

      Thanks for the comments. Historically prophecy has always been considered a temporary phenomenon. Generally once a written text of the divine will is available prophets are no longer necessary. I can’t speak for Islam, but it would not surprise me if once the Quran became widely available there was no need for further prophets. A similar thing happens with the Hebrew Bible. The word prophet, nb’, does translate as “messenger.”

      Like

Leave a reply to Sabio Lantz Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.