Bible Experts All

I seldom write follow-ups to my own blog posts – I’ve always found self-referential academics somewhat distasteful, and besides, what is creativity without some variety? Nevertheless, it seems that yesterday’s post has garnered a bit of interest in the disaffected outlook of a self-professed biblical scholar. (Actually, I have three “higher education” diplomas rolled up neatly in tubes in some untidy closet that show that some universities also accuse me with this charge.) Perhaps I need to clarify.

When reading a blog post, it is very difficult to determine the position of a writer’s tongue in relative proximity to his/her cheek. (Those with eyes to see, let them hear!) The subject might be funny if it weren’t so deadly serious. Despite my reservations with Christopher Hitchens, Sam Harris, and Bill Maher, they have all underscored a vital point – biblical literalism is very dangerous. This is even more so the case when, in their own minds, all people are Bible experts. We attend school and learn to read. Some learn to read more deeply than others, yet all “know what the book says.” There is no way to dispute that belief. Belief is belief, requiescant in pacem. Some commenters wondered why the opinion of “Bible experts” should matter at all.

When I’m feeling ill, I would prefer to ascertain the opinion of someone who has actually earned a proficiency in human physiology. When the car breaks down (again), I prefer to have someone who understands machines well as the repairer. When many, many people want to know what God doth require of thee, they turn to individuals who have not been thoroughly trained in Bible. I taught in a seminary for many years, and as an administrator, became quite familiar with the accrediting requirements of the Association of Theological Schools, the nation’s main seminary accrediting agency. I may unequivocally state that few seminarians emerge as full-fledged Bible scholars. Some “denominations” do not require any seminary training at all. So when your spiritual life breaks down, most folks head to an “expert” ill-equipped to handle the Bible, a homeopathic (no slur intended) literary diviner.

Purely from my own perspective, I would prefer to know what the Bible, in its own context, language, and words, is more likely to have meant. Delusions and all. Can’t buy that at your local church, with rare exceptions. That is the role of the humble Bible expert. As with any field of study, it is obvious when you have found a true expert. Such a one will readily admit that she or he has more questions than answers.

5 thoughts on “Bible Experts All

  1. Ian

    Thankyou Steve.

    I’m very interested in this topic, because I do think that bible scholarship is the best weapon we have against religious fundamentalism.

    Can I ask whether you still think that, personally and corporately, the bible can tell you what “God doth require of thee”? As someone who (at least as an adult) never thought like that, I find it hard to understand how that belief functions. I can, however, understand how losing that belief from the thousand cuts of biblical criticism, could be painful.

    Like

  2. Henk van der Gaast

    Possibly traversing any career at a post graduate level starts the pangs. You have to be cynical with yourself before you publish. Everything has to be proofread with a much higher level of scrutiny than normal analysis and intent.

    You become “harsher” on the contributions of others and yourself in your particular field whilst falling more and more enamoured by it. You become a better student for the rest of your life. The irrelevant things (as you see it) disappear.

    You do despair as you forget what is only now easy to you may be nigh on impossible for others to understand without being in your field for a very long time. Your obvious to others is esoteric to them.

    Sometimes many folk do not see the need for the fair “boot up the bum” that got you rolling in the first place and continue on their way following preconceived ideals. I think Steve and any other bonafide student sees this as such folk never get the gist; “be a student to be a teacher”.

    You guys have some wonderful story tellers who are astounding students. One of your best analysts and story tellers is a person by the name of Bart Ehrman and his road to Damascus story entails a small thesis he wrote on Mark c.f. the OT when he was an early undergraduate. This event showed him that literal interpretation has major pitfalls when it came to real (not the very subjective absolute) logic. Even gospel writers made mistakes.

    What an astounding career in researching the value of such mistakes this man has had to date. Just one very valuable comment by his then lecturer made an entire career.

    That goes for every field of analytical endeavour when you are allowed to be analytical.

    Like

  3. Jonathan

    In an age where anyone can self-diagnose their own medical conditions with the help of Wikipedia, real experts in almost any field may be undervalued.

    Perhaps the trouble is in the fact that no one likes to be told that ‘caring passionately about something’ is not the same thing as ‘being an expert.’ Add to that the fact that people have any number of reasons to distrust organized religion and/or any kind of professional expert that represents organized religion, and you’ve got a tough audience.

    But in the face of that devaluing of legitimate expertise, the problem of some pretty basic biblical illiteracy is downright scary. Especially when people still turn to the Good Book for answers, without much idea of how to read the thing.

    As a church and a culture, we’ve dropped the ball. We encourage people to draw their own conclusions about Scripture, and any number of other theological issues, and to look at things for themselves. And that’s a good thing, to be commended. But when we don’t give people much of a theological toolbox or a *method* for coming to their own conclusions, is it any different from teaching a teenager to drive by just giving him a set of car keys and letting him figure it all out on their own? If he wrecks the car or breaks his neck, whose fault is it? Mine or his?

    I never profess to be a biblical expert, but I constantly fight the uphill battle of trying to interpret Scripture to people who don’t even know some of the stories that are *in* the Bible, let alone what they *mean*. Where is the role of the amateur here, the one who has a limited knowledge, but is prepared to admit his limitations? Can it be the clergy’s job not to claim all the answers, but at least to present new questions, and new ways of turning Scripture on its head?

    Like

    • Steve Wiggins

      Jonathan, you are one of the few whom I considered a reliable source on the Bible for their congregations. My concern, as you probably remember from Nashotah, is how little Bible most seminarians get. Of all people, they should have more! Keep up the good work!

      Like

Leave a reply to Jonathan Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.