The Sign of Jonah

The Sign of Jonah?

Each year during the spring semester my Prophets class brings new levels of fixation on those familiar characters that so few actually know. The process began early this year. With several students of eastern Christian persuasion, Jonah became an issue based on the folkloristic nature of the tale. Jonah is particularly prone to a literal interpretation because of the “sign of Jonah” trope cited by none other than Jesus himself. Also, as I learned in my doleful days at Gorgias Press, many eastern Christians understand Jonah as a special favor to them, sent by Yahweh well before Christianity began. Even with the full weight of history against them, the students are unwilling to relinquish Jonah to his native literary genre. Then came Isaiah.

Isaiah is the most heavily co-opted prophet in the canon. Well, one might put Elijah in the running, and it would be a Chariots of Fire finish I’m sure, but as the most quoted prophet in the Christian Scriptures, Isaiah would come out on the Liddell end. So massive is this sense of ownership that Isaiah’s direct prophecy concerning the Syro-Ephramite Crisis in 7.13-17 is incapable of being understood as anything other than a prediction of a virgin birth some seven centuries down the road. Interestingly enough, it is the literal sense of this passage that is generally overlooked in favor of a later interpretation.

Even the sense of what prophecy was in the ancient world has been altered to an unrecognizable jumble by later agendas. Prophets spoke out regarding current issues (“the two kings you dread”), occasionally providing future, generally conditional, remarks. In our apocalypse-hungry society, pundits are eager for the culmination of all things and the more fireworks the better. If old Jonah and Isaiah were sitting together in a bar I can imagine the stories they’d exchange. And it wouldn’t be a whale (excuse me, “big fish”) that would be doing most of the swallowing.

2 thoughts on “The Sign of Jonah

  1. When the lesson from Isaiah 7 came up in the lectionary last week for the Annunciation, I noticed something I’ve never thought of before.

    I believe Isaiah’s *also* talking about Jesus, in large part because the gospel writers said that he was *also* talking about him. But he has to be first and foremost talking about another birth closer to home.

    Otherwise, the business of Ahaz asking for a sign doesn’t make any sense, does it? Yahweh will give you a sign, but it will take some 700 years, so you won’t be around to see it. But make sure someone writes this down, so that everyone will know that the Bible is true!

    Like

  2. I really don’t feel like going down that path, may I procrastinate?

    Its really difficult to keep bearing in mind that a lot of the stories may have appeared before the redact, but the redacts fixed them at a central point.

    Jonah? sure, its brief and to the point possibly unadulterated. Events within the Isiah tome would be the same.. but Isiah (whoever they were) certainly didn’t survive redact and spin.

    Well may we say “God save the Queen” because nothing will save the governer general! (oops wrong oratory, I’ll throw in my original now)..Who said virgin?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.