I’m about in the middle of Neal Stephenson’s Fall: Or Dodge in Hell.I’ve also just about finished Walter Wink’s Naming the Powers.At the same time I’m revising the draft of Nightmares with the Bible, which will become my fourth published book.While doing all of this at the same time (and working about nine hours a day), it occurred to me that to really “get” an author you should theoretically read her or his oeuvre from start to finish.Ideally, to trace the arc of thought, you shouldn’t leave anything out.The reason that this is as important as it is futile is one of the nagging problems that came to me while working on my doctorate: how do you know what a source you’re citing is really saying?
Pardon my nihilism, but this is an important matter when it comes to academic practice.Academics cite many sources, and often miscite them.I’ve seen it regarding my own work.One scholar argued the exact opposite of what I published in an article and even made the point that he was building on what I’d stated.Clearly he was digging where I’d been building or vice versa.We were going in opposite directions and what I’d written was to undermine what he was arguing.The thought came to me now because both Stephenson and Wink are the writers of many volumes.I need to cite my sources, but it’s clear that the books are merely slices of lifetimes of thought.Academia wants you to show your work, but its dated even before you press the “send” button.
I’m not knocking scholarly process.It’s the best system we’ve come up with for getting near to the truth.Since no one person has the entire truth, however, we get closer still if we follow a writer from start to finish.Those of use who use pseudonyms in order to keep our day jobs only complicate things.Our works (which we hope will outlast us) are only fragments of a larger world of thought that goes on behind the writing of books.And what about weblogs, or “blogs”?The million-plus words on this one are a stream of consciousness that weave within, behind, and outside of the books, articles, and stories I write.Some writers make bold as to attempt biographies of other writers.Some try to read everything said writers wrote.Even so they’re only getting part of the picture.To understand where a writer’s coming from requires more commitment than we’re likely willing to spare.Now, if you’ll excuse me, I’ve got some books to finish.
When an artisan begins a new job, s/he must acquire the tools of the trade.During a period of unemployment I seriously considered getting certified as a plumber.I’d done some plumbing repair and, unlike many people, I wasn’t afraid of it.(I am, however, terrified of electrical work.)When I was looking into it, it became clear that there would be a significant outlay of tool purchasing up front.While all of this may seem obvious, people are often surprised to learn that writing books also involves tools acquisition, although it generally pays far less than plumbing.The tools used to be made of paper, but they can wrench pipes apart and rebuild a bathroom from scratch.I’m referring to books, of course.In order to write books you have to read books.
Long ago I gave up on trying to read everything in an area before writing.There’s just too much published these days.When I was teaching and actually had a modest book allowance I would attend AAR/SBL only to come back with armloads of books that I needed for my research. Of course I had the backing of the seminary library as well, so I could find things.As an independent scholar doing the same work, however, you have to do a lot more tool acquiring since no library will back you up.Nightmares with the Bible came back from peer review with a standard-issue academic who wanted me to “show my work.”(I.e., document everything.)Apart from slowing the book down (it is written), this also means acquiring tools.AAR/SBL always reminds me of just how much is being published these days and that my toolbox, although already quite hefty, isn’t nearly big enough.
As I’m going through Nightmares rewriting and adding footnotes, I’m discovering more and more material that could be included.As an editor myself I try hard to keep to assigned word counts, and the entire allotment could easily be taken up by bibliography alone.I am very modest in my spending at conferences now—independent contractors have to be.Nightmares will likely be my last academic book; I can’t afford to keep going like this.I don’t plan to give up writing, of course, just academic publishing.Both this book and Holy Horror were written for non-specialist readerships, to showcase my non-technical way of explaining things.Both ended up with academic presses and are slated to be among those specialist tools that the beginning artisan covets but for which s/he has to budget.And when this house is finished it will have an impressive, if most unusual, private library.
Like those who write long books, those who write very many books ask for some level of commitment from their fans.I’m sure I’m not alone in wishing I had more time to read.I tend to be driven to Stephen King’s novels by the movies made around them, and there’s nothing wrong with that I suppose.I decided I wanted to read Cujo some years back when I was on a werewolf kick.I knew it wasn’t a werewolf story, yet as one who suffers from cynophobia even a large household pet will do.I didn’t know the story in advance, and I had no idea how it ended.It’s good to read novels like that sometimes.
I took it with me to San Diego and read most of it on the plane, finishing it somewhere over the mountain west.It is a bleak story, one of King’s more drawn-out and wrenching tales.It’s made more so by the fact that it could happen, at least in the main storyline.Or could have happened.Maybe I waited too long to read it, but I kept thinking as I was going through—today we have cell phones.A large part of this story unfolds because of Donna Trenton’s inability to contact anyone while a rabid dog keeps her trapped in her car during a record-breaking heat wave in Maine.I suspect it’s kind of a story about redemption, but I really need some time to think about it before rushing to such conclusions.There’s not much you can really consider religious in this particular tale, and perhaps it’s because Cujo is a very natural kind of monster.
I saw my first rabid dog when I was maybe five.My brothers and I reported a dog acting strange to our mother, after which she kept us in the house.That wasn’t the origin, I don’t think, of my cynophobia.Two of my brothers were bitten by a family dog when I was little, and I was once chased by a dog about as big as I was, certain that it was going to eat me.At the same time, we had dogs as pets, and apart from the one that liked to bite, they never gave cause for fear.Cujo tapped into those memories and made me reflect on what it means to befriend wolves.It won’t be my favorite King novel, but it did help to pass the time from coast to coast.
Every once in a while you read an inspirational book.I’m hoping readers will keep in mind that inspiration comes from different locations for some of us.Monster, She Wrote: The Women Who Pioneered Horror and Speculative Fiction, by Lisa Kröger and Melanie R. Anderson, is a source of inspiration.With the usual Quirk Books touches, this isn’t a tome heavy on literary criticism, but it is a wonderful compendium of brief bios on women who walk(ed) on the dark side.I find books like this encouraging in a number of respects.First of all, these are women who did what they loved and were recognized for it.Secondly, it gives the rest of us some hope that getting through the establishment to actual publication isn’t as impossible as presses would have us believe.And third, it’s also a lot of fun.
It isn’t often pointed out that women played a major role in the development of the horror genre.Some of the earliest Gothic novels were by Ann Radcliffe and Margaret Cavendish.Probably the first fully fledged horror novel was Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley.The real learning kicks in when the other names come out—many women found, and continue to find, the genre compelling.Most of them, like most of us, are lost to history, but many of them have been rediscovered.Here again is cause for hope; those of us who write, I think, have our eyes set on the far distant future.We’re inscribing our “Kilroy was here” on paper—I still can’t think of ebooks as actually existing—in hopes that those down the road might know us a little better.The fact that some of our sisters have been found suggests that we too may be resurrected some day.
There’s no plot here, and the point isn’t to present some great discovery.This is a book that encourages women to be who they are through example.The fact that it involves monsters and horror is simply a bonus.As a non-female reading this it struck me time and again that women have long been informed of what they should or could do by men.Men don’t like to see women knowing as much as they do about the shadow side of human existence, even as they relegated them to the shadows.It’s my hope that this book will inspire women to be themselves.And if they want to invite monsters along, so much the better.
The Lighthouse is a movie we’ve been waiting a month to see.Since its opening weekend my wife and I haven’t had two consecutive hours free during any weekend showtime.Now that we finally managed it, I’ve been left in a reverie.Robert Eggers, whose film The Witch opened to critical acclaim, has repeated the feat with this one.His movies require a lot of historical homework and the end results have a verisimilitude that pays the viewer handsomely.The details of the plot are ambiguous and the influence of King, Kubrick, Melville, Hitchcock, Poe, and Lovecraft are evident as two men in isolation grapple with insanity.Also obvious is Greek mythology, with one reviewer suggesting Tom Wake is Proteus and Ephraim Winslow is Prometheus.The end result is what happens when literate filmmakers take their talents behind a camera.
Naturally, the symbolism adds depth to the story.The eponymous lighthouse is phallic enough, but the light itself—often a central metaphor of religions—is, like God, never explained.Encountering the light changes a person, however, and the results can be dangerous, even as Rudolf Otto knew.This light shines in the darkness so effectively that no ships approach the island.The monkish existence of the keepers requires a certain comfort with the existential challenge of isolation, even if God is constantly watching.The light never goes out, even when a reprieve would be appreciated.Having reading Barbara Brown Taylor’s Learning to Walk in the Dark since the film opened, this makes some sense.Horror movies lead the viewer into such territory when they’re thoughtfully made.
The concept of light is central to at least two similar forms of religion that have moved beyond doctrinal Christianity.Both Quakerism and Unitarian Universalism emphasize the light as central to their outlooks.Whether it be divine or symbolic, light is essential to spiritual growth.In novels like Cormac McCarthy’s The Road the idea of an inner light keeps the father and son going.In The Lighthouse the external light, when taken internally, leads to madness.Since I watch horror with an eye toward religion—I do most things with an eye toward religion—I didn’t leave the theater disappointed.I knew that, like The Witch, I would need to see it again but when it comes down to the price range of one ticket for repeated viewings.Finding the time to get to the theater once was difficult enough, despite the payoff.
I wish I had more time for reading short stories.I grew up on them since, like many young boys I lacked the attention span for entire novels.Many collections of short stories sit on my shelves, but I’ve been drawn into the world of extended stories, perhaps because so much of reality bears escaping from these days.In any case, I find myself neglecting short story collections.I have a friend (and I tend not to name friends on this blog without their express permission—you might not want to be associated with Sects and Violence!) named Marvin who writes short stories.This past week his tale called “Meh Teh” appeared in The Colored Lens.Marvin often uses paranormal subjects for his speculative fiction.
“Meh-Teh” is a Himalayan term for “yeti.”Since we jealously guard our positions as the biggest apes on this planet, science doesn’t admit yetis to the realm of zoology without the “crypto” qualifier in front.Still, people from around the world are familiar with the concept of the abominable snowman.Maybe because I grew up watching animated Christmas specials, I knew from early days that a mythical, white ape lived in the mountains, and that he needed a visit to the dentist.The yeti has even become a pop culture export from Nepal, since those who know little else about that mountainous region know that strange footprints are found in the snow there.Apes, however, like to dominate so we tend to drive other apes to extinction.Still, they had to be there on the ark, along with all other cryptids.
I recall an episode of Leonard Nimoy’s In Search of that dealt with yetis.Or was it a Sun Pictures presentation about Noah’s Ark?I just remember the dramatic earthquake scene where either the skullcap of a yeti or a piece of the true ark was buried, lost forever under the rubble.Yeti is also a brand name for an outdoor goods company based, ironically, in Austin.This fantastical ape has become a spokesperson, or spokesape, for the great outdoors.All of this is a long way from the story Marvin spins about the great ape.As is typical of his fiction, religion plays a part.I really should make more time for reading short stories.In a world daily more demanding of time, that sounds like a solid investment.And free time is more rare than most cryptid sightings these days.
Tis the season for returning from the dead.Goodreads is one of the few websites that I allow to send me notices.I try to check them daily, and I even read their monthly updates of new books by authors I’ve read.I was a bit surprised when November’s newsletter began with The Andromeda Evolution by Michael Crichton.I really enjoyed The Andromeda Strain when I was in high school.The fact that I was in high school four decades ago made me wonder about the robustness of Dr. Crichton, especially since I knew that he had died over a decade ago himself.I don’t know about you, but the writing industry feels crowded enough without dead people keeping in the competition.It’s like those professors who refuse to retire, but also refuse to teach or do research.Some people, apparently, can never get enough.
We live in an era of extreme longevity.In the scope of human history, people haven’t lived so long since before the flood.Some of us—not a few, mind you—work in fields with limited job openings.We are the sort who don’t really get the tech craze, intelligent Luddites who’d rather curl up in the corner with an actual book.There are very few professorates available.Even fewer editorships.And anyone who’s tried to get an agent without being one of the former knows that there are far too many writers out there.Now the dead keep cranking ‘em out.I’ve got half-a-dozen unpublished novels sitting right here on my lap.Crichton’s gone the way of all flesh, but with an active bank account.
The end result of this Novemberish turn of events is that I want to read The Andromeda Strain again.I haven’t posted it to Goodreads since when I read it the internet itself wasn’t even a pipe dream, except perhaps in the teenage fantasies of some sci-fi fans.Since you can’t rate a book twice on Goodreads, and because paper books don’t disappear when you upgrade your device, I can do it.I can actually walk to the shelf and pull a vintage mass-market paperback off it.Even if the Earth passes through the tail of some comet and all networks are down.And I seem to recall that the original strain came from outer space.As did the strange radiation that brought the ghouls back to life on The Night of the Living Dead.Now if only some of the rest of us might get in on the action.