Everything’s Better at Harvard (Except Religion)

My wife pointed me to an important article in Newsweek on the plight of religious studies at Harvard. Now, I have to admit to a couple of bunches of sour grapes right up front. I was accepted at Harvard but elected not to go. Only after I had completed my doctorate at Edinburgh University after a lifetime of the study of religion and found that no jobs were available did I realize my mistake. I met colleagues who had jobs while attending academic conferences. All of those well settled in respectable positions had graduated from Harvard. A similar phenomenon exists in Great Britain. Those who actually find satisfactory positions hold doctorates from Oxford. Problem is, neither Harvard nor Oxford corner the market on good education (oh, the heresy!). People, however, are simplistically impressed by lineage.

In any case, this article by Lisa Miller points out the high drama of academic discord at the Shangri-La of American institutions. The famous linguist, Steven Pinker, who personally believes religion to be a severely faulty means of seeking enlightenment, has worked to prevent a required course in religion at the famed secular university on the grounds that faith and reason do not share the same status. Miller goes on to express how small colleges and state universities are picking up on the slack. My limited experience at Rutgers bears out her observations. In this large, rambling, decidedly secular school, my classes in the religion department are always full and I have to turn students away. Yet the university refuses to allow for a full-time hire. Secular America is deep in a state of denial. Because many academics reject religion personally, they simply can’t see how vital it is to understand it. I personally believe no one should be allowed to hold public office without having completed a course in Bible and its political abuse.

Meanwhile, Harvard still holds back. Its reticence will not prevent misinformed people from using their religion as a means of power and destruction. Pretending that since religion is not personally important it is not important at all has deadly consequences. To me it seems obvious that it is not the school you attend that is important, but what you learn while you are there.

7 thoughts on “Everything’s Better at Harvard (Except Religion)

  1. Lauren

    I remember for Rutgers that the religion classes were always full, and I am glad to hear that hasn’t changed. It is discouraging, however, that the university still has not renewed the HB/OT line. I think it’s interesting you connected that problem to the general non-religiosity of academics. I would not have thought of that. One of my professors made the crucial distinction that universities are supposed to be about thought and not of belief – and what you’re saying is that their non-belief (which is fine) actually clouds their ability to help students think (which is not fine).

    Like

  2. Steve Wiggins

    Thanks, Lauren!

    It is good to hear from you! I appreciate your take on the situation as well. I think more professors need to read current studies of consciousness and neurology (Mithen, Damasio, De Sousa, and Evans, for example) that demonstrate how much “non-rational” elements affect rational thought. Alas, universities, however, are quite in favor of turf wars with over-inflated egos and limited budgets. I’m glad people like you are willing to look at the issues squarely and see what might be done!

    Like

  3. Production

    Embracing religious illiteracy will not render an individual immune to religious extremism and fanatacism. I think that such ignorance can only leave us vulnerable to manipulation and abuse.

    This is widely agreed upon when it comes to sex education. Of course, the format and content of sex ed classes are still controversial, but the existence of the classes themselves are usually not.

    Maybe one day religious literacy and education will be considered just as vital as sex education and scientific literacy.

    Like

    • Steve Wiggins

      Excellent point. It is a very odd comment on our current culture that we’ve come to the point where basic knowledge about being human is controversial and is avoided by many. Too many people are afraid of the the truth.

      Like

    • Steve Wiggins

      Thanks, Kathy.
      As is clear from the very premise of this blog, it is my opinion that religion must be studied and understood. I know many people at Harvard that agree with me, but university politicians — well, I won’t go there! Thanks for the links!

      Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.