Klaatu Barada Nikto

I grew up with robots. Of course they were on the television screen and I was far away in rural-ish western Pennsylvania. They were exotic creatures built by guys much more intelligent than I could ever hope to be, and they were powerful, completely rational, and scary. Now I find myself involved with the FIRST Robotics team in my daughter’s high school where kids a third my age are building a robot. It is a humbling experience.

The more I ponder my small support role in the construction of a robotic creature, the more my thoughts turn to George Dyson’s masterful science writing in one of my favorite books — Darwin Among the Machines: the Evolution of Global Intelligence. I would not have known of this brilliant book had I not met George and a group of his friends several years back while they were discussing some of the ideas raised in his work. The main one that captured my attention was the premise that when we build machines we may be constructing an unrecognized form of consciousness. The greatest minds in neuroscience today cannot agree on what consciousness really is or how far it extends beyond this “three-pound universe” in our heads. Although most would decline to comment on the overtly religious term “soul,” we still know that any difference between consciousness, mind, psyche, and soul is very slim indeed.

Read this book!

Our lifestyle is made possible by robots. We drive cars largely constructed by them, use their chips to communicate over vast distances, and even take a stroll on the surface of Mars with them. My question from Monday’s post may have been whimsical, but it was serious. Where is it that the essence of a creature resides? Does it require carbon-based biology, or do we, unwittingly, create a race of slaves just like the gods of old?

4 thoughts on “Klaatu Barada Nikto

  1. Dawkins in his new Evolution book and Bruce Hood’s earlier book on SuperSense both discuss the Platonic illusion of “essence”.

    Thus, agreeing with both of them, your question is mistaken from the get-go? A creature does not have an essence. It is a common pervasive everyday superstition.


  2. Steve Wiggins

    Perhaps I indulge in Descartes’ error? I think I have an essence, therefor I do? I’ve got my copy of Supersense but haven’t had a chance to read it yet. I’m a few books behind on Dawkins as well, I’m afraid. Still, if we don’t have an essence, what can we call it? There is something that makes each individual, many animals as well, different from each other. What might we call it?


  3. Ean Behr

    I’d call it “probability.” As in, with all the multiple millions (billions?) of genetically and culturally variable constituent elements of human beings, the probability that any two–even “identical” twin–people will actually be identical is astronomically small.


  4. Pingback: Barada “Funk For Yo Trunk” (LATIMESX3 EXCLUSIVE) (NEW 2009) | Lowrider Design

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.