WWJWF?

On the way to work yesterday, my wife spotted an old billboard ad that read, “My birthday wish: Protect life from conception until natural death. Jesus.” Now, I realize that this is a belated birthday response (or perhaps premature – scholars of the Christian Scriptures tell me Jesus was likely born in April), but I felt compelled to exegete this wish. In the biblical world, which, by definition, includes Jesus, there was no such thing as conception as we know it. Ancient folk did not know about sperm and ova, and so “conception” was simply the act of carrying a child. When it began they did not know. The Bible is pretty clear that breath indicates life, so life begins at the moment of the first breath. Everyone in the first century knew that.

As a good Jewish believer, Jesus also knew that the Bible dictates scores of reasons that life would not end naturally. Many acts considered normal and healthy today were singled out in the Torah as offenses against the almighty, and many were worthy of the death penalty. If natural death is the divine will, well, father and son ought to have a heart-to-heart talk. I will go on the record as opposed to capital punishment. Heck, I’ll go on the record as a pacifist and a vegetarian too. I do so, however, fully aware that the Bible has a different view.

My concern with billboards like this is that they co-opt a figure who cannot correct the human errors of misreading emotion for righteousness. Anyone with money can make up a birthday wish for Jesus and, with a willing vendor, splay it out for all passing motorists to see. I respect the sanctity of life, but I don’t force my wishes into Jesus’ mouth. We have the Bible, we have brains. For those who want to know what Jesus really wished for, it is a simple a matter as reading a book.

6 thoughts on “WWJWF?

  1. Henk van der Gaast

    Signs like that are made by well meaning people. If the veracity of any cause had to be stated, there would have been an ISO quality control document.

    It stands you in good stead that not much insults your intelligence. Those who could have much to learn from.

    I think Phillip K. Dick’s (do androids) neatly argues the values of life and would hopefully insult the intelligence of many (so as to learn).

    Any chance of adding that to a school curriculum? Amasingly my daughter has had to sit through this dumb movie called “Blade Runner”. An hour of severe interrogation (of me) for the interpretive components of her report helped.

    Sadly, that hour would have got 3/4 way through the book for a 100 pages per hour girl.

    We would all love to be gods that produce gods. I for one am far less than that! Maybe one day the only profound thing I may be quoted on might be something frivolous. I would hate to think life choices would be made around my solid lure bass casting expertise…or bread making.

    Like

  2. “For those who want to know what Jesus really wished for, it is a simple a matter as reading a book.”

    Steve, how closely do you think the Bible tells us what Jesus really wanted? Which writer(s)?

    Like

  3. Steve Wiggins

    @ Henk, aw, now, Blade Runner is a classic! The book, however, is better. I’ve been guilty of making students watch it once in a while.

    @ Sabio, that sentence was heaped with a dose of irony. Although I don’t agree with their method of voting, I do think the Jesus Seminar is on the right track of how to figure out which words actually go back to Jesus. The Gospel of Thomas seems to have ended up with quite a few!

    Like

  4. Henk van der Gaast

    “Dumb movie” were her words… not mine.

    Re Sabio;
    You know, there seems to be a give away… The punch line “Keep to the Torah” is pretty definitive of his mind for me. It may be one of the few gems we can actually trace his other ideals on.

    Sadly with the exponential growth of interpretive literature we do not get freedom from choice in our endeavours any more

    Like

  5. Steve Wiggins

    Yes! That is exactly it! The Bible comes pre-interpreted for people. Even if it didn’t, the fact is few people have the training to understand the Bible in context. It is problematic on many levels.

    Like

  6. Henk van der Gaast

    Steve, I’ve been troubled by the moabite succession for years. One thing I do know is Jesus must have been from an “Ezritic” school to pursue righteousness as he did.

    Paul wasn’t and this is where the Hellenised literature redacting Jesus into the wider world begins ( in my view).

    I would dearly have wanted to talk to Yaakov or Thomas. Its just my string theory stops at beta functions and kitchen twine.

    Like

Leave a reply to Sabio Lantz Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.