The End of the World as We Know It

Well, that may be a bit dramatic, but my whole family is scratching its collective head over the news that our time on this planet has been foreshortened by the Chilean earthquake. Yes, scientists from NASA announced yesterday that Saturday’s 8.8 magnitude earthquake actually shook the earth three inches off its axis and has led to a loss of 1.26 milliseconds of time. Even for the gods this seems to be playing against the rules!

I wonder what the Fundamentalists are thinking about it? I do know that some extremely conservative types mess with time when trying to explain how the 4.5 billion-year-old world could have been manufactured in just 6 days — they call it the “day-age theory.” Or that the globe stopped spinning for 24 hours to give Joshua and his invaders more time to kill the Canaanites. I’ve even had students tell me that this latter case was scientifically proven. Time, however, ticks on despite our concerns with it.

It was my daughter who suggested the title for this post. After she said it, however, she noted, “Well, actually the world as we know it ended with the earthquake.” The world as we knew it. Radical changes have taken place with stunning rapidity on this old globe we call home, and some days the whole world changes. In 1815 the eruption of Mount Tambora led to the “year without a summer.” Wayward space rocks sometimes wipe out over 90 percent of all species on the planet. We live in a constantly changing environment. And it is my hunch that when that final disaster comes, those who’ve spent all their energy climbing the money mountain in the company of financial wizards, bank presidents, insurance profiteers, and oil company gods will come running to those who’ve spent their lives learning about religion seeking comfort in the face of the inevitable. We know we live in a temporary world; the wise spend their time contemplating the implications of that fact.

A little more to the left...

One thought on “The End of the World as We Know It

  1. Henk van der Gaast

    My only takes on that are;

    1) literalism immediately confers behavioral privilege on the group that practices it.
    2) literalism means selective interpretation. If the data obtained for such a position is poor, literalism will always have posits tat are incorrect.

    What follows is an example of getting things screwed up by reading bits and pieces here and there!

    I am pretty sure that I could literally interpret the bible as a fierce battle of the younger Yahweh due to jealousy and the fact his previous name was Lahamu.. all his positioning to bury his name and the associated deed poll is spectacularly successful until he is reborn into his own “house”. John of Patmos almost gives the gig away but doesn’t get a round smiting because the tome just looked so great.

    But ladies and gentlemen, I have some supporting evidence outside the bible..some reviewers and redactors hold that southern and south eastern Semites actually worshipped the beautiful (but jealous) serpent until they were told to toe the authoritative line by Yaakov and Mohamed.

    Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.