Plumbing the Depths of the Universe

Lasting summer I helped a friend unclog his sewer line (the mark of a true friend). That episode readily released me from a lifelong fear of plumbing, and when our kitchen sink leak got to me shortly after, I took courage and fixed it. Now, a year later, it looks like a seal has gone bad. With stagnant water dripping on my face, cantilevered under a pot-bellied sink, I discovered that plumbers have their little trade secrets. Trying to loosen in intake line nut with a standard vice-grip set of pliers, removing skin from my knuckles while at an unbecoming angle for a man my age, I felt like Bill Bixby turning into the incredible Hulk. I knew I had to make the long drive to New Brunswick to get my Rutgers campus mail after this, and I was getting nowhere with the nut. Traffic in New Jersey is relentless, and it looked like my entire day was shot when I noted there was a Scarlet Knight football game today, and I have to drive right by the stadium where the millionaire football coach prevents guys like me from being hired. So there, head under the sink, fuming with rage, I had an epiphany.

Reality, as we are taught in our rational educational systems, can be explained by reason. Certainly the fact that I’m typing this post on a highly sophisticated computer to upload to a god-like Internet, demonstrates that reason works. Bit by bit, piece by piece, scientists figure out how our world works. And yet, many scientists also ascribe to religious beliefs. Explaining religion will need to await another post, but it is fair to state that religion is generally something that effects the emotions. We tend to accept religion with our feelings rather than trying to wrench it in with reason. With my face dripping with runoff, I wondered, what if there are two separate realities?

Ockham’s razor may apply here, but I don’t shave. What if reality consists of a non-rational, emotional universe as well as a simultaneous, empirically explainable one? What if we are leading dual lives straddling two different forms of reality? That doesn’t make any one religion true, but it might explain why we haven’t been able to explain emotion. Psychologists like to trace it back to “fight or flight” functions from our reptilian brains, but the emotion we experience often seems more intense than that. Emotion may drive a highly rational human being to completely nonsensical behavior. Perhaps we are participating in a universe that requires a two-pronged approach. Perhaps rationality is only half the picture. As I prepare to stick my head back under the sink again, I realize what plumbers must have long known – some things, such as under-sink arrangements, simply can’t be explained by reason alone.

One thought on “Plumbing the Depths of the Universe

  1. Henk van der Gaast

    Steve, millionaire football coach he maybe, but I bet he can fix his sink.

    I always get harassed with “you have a PhD and a willy, you are useless to society”. I’d be damned if I would admit it so emphatically in a blog.

    As to the main message, you are absolutely right that a lot of scientists have belief sets. It’s because we humans expend less time deriving things than accepting authority (a child see its parents as the font of all knowledge). If someone indicates that s/he is an authority, people are going to accept their sage advise.

    It would be highly irresponsible to do, but consider that you presented a conspiratorial proposition related to ancient Canaanites in class. I would bet that a lot of your students would believe this fascinating tidbit for the rest of their uni days.

    Come to think of it, I’d say do it. Tell them at the start for semester you will present a false argument in one lesson and they have to spot it.

    There are many things that get mentioned by populist mythological commentors . These are parroted down the line as fact. One is so ridiculous that you only need stick your head out of the window to disprove it.

    Why are these things believed by folk who are supposedly trying to get a good grip on our current religions from old? Its called the “theory of dissemination of unreliable tidbits”.

    Sounds good but wrong, no matter how many times you say something wrong, its still wrong.

    A textual example of this would be Jesus telling a few disciples to go ahead and prepare for the meal. Of late there are many populists interpretations of what was said and its implications. The simplest answer is that the passage was written well after to show that Jesus obviously knew what what going to happen.

    Of course how could this be right? Even pointing out the fact that every subsequent detail of events shows that its written to show Jesus knew what was going to happen. Water bearers, high places, 12 zodiacal representatives be damned, its just a clever way of writing things.

    Why is it so hard to teach a person simple math and so easy to teach simplistic conspiracies (and religion itself is one)? Evolution has its grassy knolls….

    Like

Leave a reply to Henk van der Gaast Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.