Troying Around

While discussing Homer with my relatives, it was decided that we should watch the movie Troy. Although conceived as a blockbuster retelling of the Iliad, the presentation reminded me significantly of The Clash of the Titans (2010). In both instances the directors and writers attempted to portray a realism of sorts, making Achilles and Perseus into just regular guys with issues. There is something of the fallen hero here, and perhaps a misunderstanding of the way the Greeks understood their greats. While it can’t be denied that heroes were intended as figures of unattainable stature, they were in some sense conceived as role models for mere mortals. The Iliad is an exploration of the anger of Achilles and the unpredictable influence of the gods.

As the critics pointed out when the movie was first released, the absence of the gods from the film is a serious departure from the Iliad. Without the gods, Achilles takes on a level of prominence never intended by Homer (whoever he was) and the playing out of his revenge begins to feel like a bad western. Although the Iliad does focus on Achilles, it requires an ensemble cast. None of the characters are evil like the movie portrays Agamemnon. He, along with his brother Menelaus, is the hapless inheritor of the curse of the house of Atreus. No matter what Agamemnon does, he is doomed. This fatalism is cut short in Troy as Menelaus, Ajax, and Agamemnon fall in the foreshortened battle of Troy.

The Trojan War is a myth. There is no history to portray accurately here. Instead there are gods and heroes. In removing the gods—a subtle nod toward many modern sensitivities—the movie loses its soul to beat the bank. And so perhaps it is a modern parable for a society that values money above all else. Whether the gods are real or not is immaterial, for they are but projections of the human spirit. Without them we are mere molecules conglomerated into biological entities with no purpose. Troy is a movie that falls short of truly mythical status, but at the same time holds a mirror to modern culture and asks “are you so sure that you can live without the gods?”

4 thoughts on “Troying Around

  1. Jim W.

    While there most certainly have been cities along the western coast of Asia Minor for thousands of years isn’t there some debate as to whether a city named “Troy” ever existed at all?

    As for the film, having Brad Pitt act out scenes with Peter O’ Toole didn’t help the image of Achilles either.

    Like

  2. benemorylarson

    I actually loved that Troy left out the gods; I thought the filmmakers cleverly planted the seeds of the myth in Troy’s realistic narrative. I don’t think departing from the original myth is an intrinsically poor choice…but I certainly agree that the departure powerfully altered the thrust of the story.

    Interesting thoughts! Thanks for posting!

    Like

  3. In practice atheism is the rejection of the belief in society s dominant form of god or gods. Even early Christians were accused of atheism for rejecting the gods of Rome and Socrates for rejecting the gods of Athens.

    Like

  4. Steve Wiggins

    Thanks for the comments!

    @ benemorylarson: I agree that the choice of leaving out the gods was fine for the movie. I contend elsewhere that movies are the current mythology and such a move on the part of the makers of Troy underscores that nicely.

    @ Jim W.: Hi Jim. There was a city of Troy; it was found and excavated (partially) by Heinrich Schliemann in the nineteenth century. Classicists are pretty certain, however, that the Trojan War, as described in authors of antiquity, did not occur. Troy was destroyed at the end of the Bronze Age along with Ugarit, the Hittite Empire, and several other important cities. It was certainly a period of unrest in the ancient world, and one where the gods seem to have been pretty inactive.

    Like

Leave a reply to benemorylarson Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.