Evolving Leadership

Simple answers are seldom correct. Unfortunately many people will accept a simple answer rather than try to sort through the complexities that life in the universe provides in such abundance. I was given cause for hope by an interview that I saw on The Upworthiest. Zack Kopplin, a student only nineteen years old, is taking on the creationists in the south. It’s not an easy thing to do. As Bill Moyers points out in this interview, 46% of Americans believe in creationism. In a land where everything is a matter of choice, it seems, science is just one of many options. Also, Fundamentalist clergy are among the most gifted spin-doctors ever to have evolved. By pairing evolution and atheism and values that are dangerous to their beloved lifestyle, the message goes out from thousands of pulpits that evolution is a lie and that the Bible is a science book after all. And people, easily led, will follow. For many decades scientists and religionists alike refused to even address creationism, supposing illogical thought would eventually die out. What they were actually witnessing was a match thrown into a kindle-dry forest after decades of drought.

Even the case of Zack is a demonstration of this. When a law passed in his native Louisiana making it easier to teach creationism in the public schools, those who knew better did nothing. It took a nineteen-year-old to try to change the law. One could argue that full-grown scientists and other professionals have too much to do to waste their time on such foolishness. The problem is, as Zack is keenly aware, the creationists are well funded, strategic, and insidious. Fueled by self-righteousness, and supported by at least 16 years of presidential administrations that approved of creationism as a form of science, this movement is as much a threat as the NRA is to a peaceable kingdom. Maybe more of a threat because nobody takes them seriously. There is a plenty of history documenting the growth and development of the creationist movement, and, as Zack knows, it is not a fad. Most serious scholars just don’t bother to read it.

Creationism thrives by its own sense of victimization. Science offers us no cuddly deity who will make everything right at the end of a life of toil and turmoil. That is fine for science, but we must never forget that people are people. We need something to hold onto. It is this that creationists understand. Instead of calling it delusional, perhaps scientists need to step back and realize that it is a profoundly human need. That doesn’t make creationism right—not by a long stretch—but it might help to understand why it just doesn’t seem to go away. Instead of ignoring, science must address creationism. And so must those with serious training in religion. Creationism doesn’t survive close scrutiny by either scientists or religious specialists, but it sure does offer a feel-good ending. Until we admit that they’ve done their homework, those who oppose creationism are going to find themselves being led by nineteen-year-olds with a sense of what’s really at stake. And that’s complicated.

Yes, they will attack the prophet

Yes, they will attack the prophet

1 thought on “Evolving Leadership

  1. I could see the Bible being taught along side other religious texts in a religious studies class, or even if there was a period offered that students could study the religion or non religion of their choice, as I seem to rember the LDS kids leavingcampus in highschool for some reason every day
    What worries me about Creationism is the (what I feel is) pseudoscience being taught at the Creation Museum run by Ken Hamm. My in-laws took my kids there and they brought home this book called “The Young Earth” by John Morrison. Keep in mind my kids go to a private Christian school, I am sure they are taught or will be taught this…. My in-laws totally believe this pseudoscience. This book goes side by side with evolution and tries to debunk it, always referring back to the bible.
    Here is a paragraph….
    If people were taught to think, taught to recognize the difference between scientific facts, whichcan be observed in the present, and taught ideas about the past which can be used to interpret the facts, then the issue would be cleared up, for the intellectually honest, anyway. SAT scores would climb once again as science (italicized) classes spent more time on science(italicized) and less on ideas about evolutionary history.
    The book often states how Old earth, and theistic evolutionists are not “real Christians”.
    So if this is the “Creationism” they want to teach in science class… Ugh. I hide this book from my kids, I am tempted to throw it away but I feel one day it can be a good learning tool in critical thinking… As for them studying science in private school as long as they stick to experiments, and continue to watch Bill Nye, I’m ok, and we can be in the school but not of the school. Sorry about the long post. Ps I used to comment under Alice.j but then I created an account and it changed.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.