Some years back I read Ransom Riggs’ Miss Peregrine’s Home for Peculiar Children and the two follow-up volumes. My interest in them was reignited when I started seeing them being branded as dark academia. The home is really a kind of school and the images offer a feeling compatible with other dark academia works for children. Then, reading about Tim Burton, I realized one of the few movies of his I hadn’t seen was the one based on this book. Now, it has been long enough that the storyline has faded a bit, but I’m pretty sure the movie took some liberties with the original tale. Even before seeing the movie, it seemed to me that Burton’s distinctive style would be a good match for what I remembered of the tale. I didn’t know it was a Burton movie when I first learned about it.
The best way to be introduced to the story is to read Riggs’ books, but the basic idea is that “peculiar” children—those with strange abilities—are kept in secret locations by Ymbryne, peculiar women that can turn into birds. Miss Peregrine, for example. They are kept safe from Hollowgasts, monsters that want to eat their eyes, and Wights, Hollowgasts that eat enough eyes to appear human. The children are kept safe in time loops created by Ymbryne, where everyone stays the same age and they can hide from Wights and “Hollows.” Jake’s grandfather was in Miss Peregrine’s home, but he decided to leave to hunt down the Wights and Hollows. When he’s killed, Jake wants to find out if all the stories he told were true. His father, thinking his son has mental issues, agrees to go on holiday with him and Jake finds and befriends the peculiars at the school. They’re stuck in 1943.
When a Wight follows Jake to Miss Peregrine’s loop, the children have to fight the Hollows and Wights to rescue her. And Jake has to make a decision whether to stay in 1943 or go back to 2016 where things haven’t been so great for him. You get the picture. The movie’s not bad. It threw me a bit not to have the music by Danny Elfman. Again, the subject matter would seem to have suited his particular style. I remember hearing about the movie when it came out a decade ago. It didn’t make a huge splash, and nobody else I know had read the books so I didn’t see the film back then. Burton is a director that I’ve followed more or less steadily since his second film. I have a little more catching up to do, however, peculiar as that may seem.














