Older than Stonehenge

MSNBC ran a story yesterday concerning a little-known henge in Dartmoor, England. Images of these remote Dartmoor megaliths transported me back to my years in the British Isles when my wife and I spent every available tuppence traveling around to see antiquities so old that the Roman fortifications along Hadrian’s Wall seemed like throwbacks to the 1950s. With some English friends we met in Edinburgh we drove through the bleak moors of Dartmoor and Exeter, down into the forgotten curiosities of Cornwall, and back to Salisbury Plain to see Stonehenge. One year for my birthday we flew to the Orkneys (on a plane designed like a shoebox with wings) to explore the islands with the highest concentration of preserved prehistoric sites in Europe. Suffering from a killer head-cold, I accompanied my wife on hands and knees into tombs constructed thousands of years before William turned his conquering eye onto the British mainland. Colossal stone rings larger than Stonehenge, but less bulky and lacking capstones, stood out in the middle of a field where the locals barely threw a glance; such monuments had become part of the daily backdrop.

Archaeologists constantly attempt to discern the function of these silent remains. The MSNBC story suggests, based on the remains of porcine bones, that the Dartmoor site may have been associated with funerary rites. Carbon dated to 3500 BCE, they predate Noah’s putative ark (dated precisely to 1657, thank you Bishop Ussher) by more than a millennium. That they may have been associated with death is no surprise – the great feats and structures of humankind seem to be exactly that, efforts to cheat death. To leave reminders that we were here and we had something to say. What exactly they had to say, however, is muffled by the eons of lost communication.

A phenomenon I have noticed for many decades now is that when an unexplained structure or artifact is recovered, first recourse among many archaeologists is to attribute religious significance to it. Religion is the default fall-back when we can’t explain why people were expending tremendous resources to articulate a primal, deep concern in stone or clay. In many respects, the same is true today. Religious leaders still raise funds like no other class of professionals, simply by suggesting that death itself may be cheated of its due. All that money, however, can’t stop the inevitable. Instead of running away, I side with the archaeologists as I poke my head into some dank, dark space no other person has explored for many a month or year. Sitting quietly in an empty tomb left by an ancient society rendered completely mute by high antiquity, you are nevertheless in touch with what it means to be truly human.

7 thoughts on “Older than Stonehenge

  1. Henk van der Gaast

    Pedantry alert!

    “thousands of years before William turned his conquering eye onto the British mainland”.

    Didn’t Gillaume le Petard turn his conquering eye onto the British mainland?

    I am pretty sure that archaeology has its inherent quality as well. British Isles “experts” have been and still can be as “spurious” with facts alongside imaginative interpretation as their ANE counterparts.

    Its a pity really. Articles in journals that describe hard science applications to remains and artefacts just do not draw the same attention as lavish descriptions of the positioning of a rock that may be exactly, close to, nearby or associated with a ley line or Jacobs river battle.

    This article comes very hard on the link I sent yesterday. Am I prescient or did I just hear peals of laughter from across the pacific that forced you into including some of its content?

    Like

    • Steve Wiggins

      Thanks, Sophie.
      That’s what I miss most, perhaps, about living in Europe. There was a sense of connection to the prehistoric past that those of us colonials can never have this side of the Atlantic. I can only imagine what it must be like to be in Africa where the very roots of the human lineage first emerge! Thanks for sharing this.

      Like

  2. Henk van der Gaast

    ooooh (small explosion)!

    Steve, get in a car and go south a few meters. I am sure you will find something old and obscure enough to whet your whistle. Next time you are in Canada or Alaska there are plenty of shared ethnicity remnants to connect to Siberia and Kamchatka.

    Religion, people, lifestyle and genes.

    People never look in their own backyard.

    In Australia we make it up because nobody recognises the ancient cultures of our indigenes either.

    Do you want a quartz gigantopithecus endocast? and australopithics endocast in coal? A yowie poop or a panther scratch, a flinders ranges aztec temple or a phonecian harbour in the northern territory? A thirty foot lizard?

    Yes, its all confusing for us too. We have so many sights and sites. We’d like to see a really good asylum for the popularisers of the above codswallop.

    We sent you Ken Ham. Do you want any more?

    Maybe some singing stones? Cheap!

    Like

Leave a reply to Henk van der Gaast Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.