What’s Wrong with Eve?

Reading a newspaper film analysis by critic Stephen Witty on film noir, I was intrigued by how he represents the role of the femme fatale. Most produced and directed by men, the classic noir features a dangerous woman. Noting that there are “nice girls” in such movies, Witty states, “they’re not the ones who matter, the ones as essential to the plot as that serpent is to Genesis.” Naturally, this statement evokes the image of Eve, the seductress.

Eve has been much maligned by patriarchal religions. She is a convenient scapegoat for men’s uncontrollable urges, and by making her the gateway to sin itself the male spiritual psyche is unburdened; it is all her fault. It often comes as a surprise that Genesis does not use the word “sin” in the episode in Eden. Interpretations of the tree of knowledge are not universally negative, nor is Eve alone to blame. Scapegoats, however, are much more comfortable than admitting culpability. Religions have stropped this to a high art; the masculine religious establishment can repress the feminine threat with scriptural justification.

Eve is a misunderstood heroine. She is the mother of knowledge. Genesis does not forbid the tree of life; ignorant humanity was free to live forever. Without knowledge. Eve, while perhaps under the duress of temptation, nevertheless took the initiative to find wisdom. And she has been paying the price ever since. Film noir is a reflection of life, as is most art. In a world where men like to think they have the right to rule, the woman who sees a little farther is considered dangerous. All feeble theological attempts to forbid religious leadership to women have Eve to thank for their revisionist hermeneutics.

4 thoughts on “What’s Wrong with Eve?

  1. matthew

    the word “sin” might not be used in the story of Adam and Eve, but they explicitly disobey God and are punished for it. I think that counts as sin, even if the word was not used.

    I’m reminded of one time in a bible class, when this controversial guy was talking about the Adam and Eve story. He jokingly said that sin is all Eve’s fault, before moving on to his main point. I and most people kinda laughed, but one guy stood up and left in a huff, saying “It wasn’t her fault!” on the way out. I never really saw the big deal there… is it so controversial to say that the first person to take the fruit from the serpent was at fault?

    Like

    • Steve Wiggins

      Thanks Matthew.

      Your response is one I often receive about the fact that sin is not mentioned here. Reading it into the passage is a classic example of eisegesis, something careful readers who want to let the text speak for itself should not do. Looking at Genesis 1-11 as a whole, sin begin with the first murder; it kind of makes eating fruit seem like a walk in the park. As for “someone” being blamed, again, it is easy to say it from the male perspective since male experience is undamaged by it. Women, on the other hand, have frequently had to pay the price for this misreading and continue to do so. It is no exaggeration to say that the domineering role played by most men today is the result of a “biblically based” society.

      Like

  2. Henk van der Gaast

    Steve, genes for male domineering behaviour sits on the “y” chromosome not in a book.

    It took womens emancipation movements to show us men that we are far better off if we have a more equitable society.

    It shouldn’t stop here.

    My daughter is a bit of a feminist and its great to see her argue. I can’t take the blame for all of it either. The kid is just good at it.

    Like

Leave a reply to matthew Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.