Noah’s Newest Neighbor

This week paleontologists announced the newest dinosaur discovery: Kosmoceratops, a plant-eating, three-ton beast with an improbable arrangement of fifteen horns on its head. Any beast arising from the sea would be jealous. As Kosmoceratops jostles its way onto the ark, scientists debate the utility of all those horns – placed incorrectly for defensive purposes, they seem to have functioned to attract mates. Isolated on a fairly compact land mass, these Cretaceous ceratopsids bloomed into a distinctive species as showy as any other so far discovered. As evolution continues to stir debate in this country, its evidence keeps marching along.

Every semester, four terms per year, I have students work on a project that includes (in part) evolution and the Hebrew Bible. Every semester as I overhear discussion, I realize just how deeply the anti-evolutionary front has its claws in the American psyche. Otherwise intelligent undergraduates studying a variety of subjects: science, business, engineering, psychology, express their doubts about evolution. The reason: the Bible doesn’t affirm it. Nor does the Bible affirm atomic theory, free market economics, or microchips. Evolution hits, perhaps, a little too close to home.

The dinosaurs stomp in the face of Creationism. As much as the fundies try to embrace them, dinosaurs are just too outlandish to fit in any world other than evolution. The God of the Bible doesn’t seem to have a surfeit of humor to have wasted so much creativity on dinosaurs that no human ever got to see. We reconstruct, with amazement, species after flamboyant species, and yet the foes of science keep a finger firmly tucked in Genesis. Serious Bible scholars seldom have difficulties with letting science do its job, including evolution. The agitation arises from another quarter. And with all those horns in front of us, that quarter might be the apocalyptic sea after all.

4 thoughts on “Noah’s Newest Neighbor

  1. Henk van der Gaast

    Look when it comes down to tick tacks all it means is that there is more mental stimulation for us folk who can read literature without having to peer through a frame work of misconception.

    i.e. more chocolates for us, more manna for them.

    We can have chocolate coated manna, they can’t!

    The same arguments goes for any science when you think about it. Whilst there are any true flat earthers left one can honestly say that the luddite factor wrt to science education will always be at a relative zenith.

    The gratifying thing is that they all become stooges as they unknowingly accept sciences in their day to day purchases and practices.

    How does the song go? “Right said Fred…”

    Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.