What the Devil

Apart from being one of the most controversial films of all time, The Devils is also devilishly difficult to locate.  For as influential as it was (you can’t tell me nobody in Monty Python saw this before making Holy Grail) it has largely been buried, at least in the United States.  It doesn’t stream and to get a viewable copy you are limited to a Spanish language import DVD and have to manually select English as the language if you want to hear it as produced.  The question is if you do want to see/hear it.  Written and directed by Ken Russell, it is over-the-top.  Chaotic and cacophonous, it’s almost distracting and somewhat boring for about half its run time.  Then it turns incredibly violent and grotesque.  So why did I watch it?  Well, for one thing, it was something I knew I could’ve included in Holy Horror, had I been able to access it then.  For another thing, I’d read about it many times and was determined to find it.

Based on historical events (but stylized to the point of abstraction), the film is about the Loudun possessions of 1634.  Nuns in an Ursuline convent began displaying the kinds of tics that girls would display in Salem some 58 years later.  A local, unconventional priest, Urbain Grandier, was accused of bewitching them and was burned at the stake.  The film makes much of the political machinations taking place, and revels a little too much in the behavior of the nuns.  It also enjoys portraying medieval torture methods and has an almost Clockwork Orangesque feel to it.  Released in 1971, it was given restrictive ratings where it was permitted to be shown, and although some horror has surpassed the excesses in recent years.

Religion’s relationship to horror is a frequent topic of discussion on this blog.  This movie is a textbook example of that.  After my nerves stopped jangling so much, I recollected that Ken Russell was also responsible for Lair of the White Worm.  Another story of debauched nuns and religion gone awry, it made me wonder what Russell’s personal interaction with religion might have been.  He apparently converted to Catholicism and then converted away again.  It certainly doesn’t get much sympathy in his movies.   Father Grandier is somewhat heroic in The Devils, but the overall institution is clearly corrupt.  In some cases religion is the means of fighting horror.  In other cases it is the cause of the horror.  Here the latter is clearly on display, and even that is, unfortunately, over the top.

2 thoughts on “What the Devil

  1. secretsoftlyf6e52c7696

    Loudon rang a bell, so I checked Carlos Eire’s book, “They Flew.” Here’s what he writes, “Four centuries later, during the Cold War, the devils, nuns, and exorcists of Loudun attracted unexpected attention from novelists, playwrights, musicians, and filmmakers, as well as scholars, as no possession story ever had or perhaps ever will.” He adds in a footnote, “The Devils of Loudun (1952), a novel by Aldous Huxley; The Devils (1961), a play by John Whiting; Mother Joan of the Angels (1961), a novel by Jaroslaw Iwaszkiewicz, turned into a film by director Jerzy Kawalerowicz; Die Teufel von Loudun (1969), an opera by Krzysztof Penderecki, based on Huxley’s and Whiting’s works; The Devils (1971), a film directed by Ken Russell, based on Huxley’s and Whiting’s works.”

    I wonder what you think of the timing of these creative works based on Loudon?

    Thanks for all your movie mentions. I don’t know if I’ll seek out this film, especially after not quite making it through “Lair of the White Worm,” but we’ll see!

    Like

    • Thanks for the comment! I love Eire’s book.

      As for the timing, this is my read: Huxley published a provocative book. This led to a play about a decade later—this isn’t that uncommon. It’s also not unusual for a novelist to try to ride the coat-tails of an earlier novel’s success. These days it only takes less than a year before copycats appear, but in the sixties publishing was much slower (and there wasn’t really much competition, not like there is today). Novels to films have been popular since cinema began (I discuss this a little in my Sleepy Hollow book). Russell was, apparently, always on the lookout for something he could make outrageous, and the story of Loudun fit the bill.

      That’s how I’d see the progression. I do have to wonder if William Peter Blatty saw this while working on The Exorcist, though.

      Like

Leave a reply to secretsoftlyf6e52c7696 Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.