One of the problems with auteur theory is that you cast directors into an expected genre in your mind. Or at least I do, and that is unfair to directors since they, like those of us who write, sometimes explore different genres. My first exposure to M. Night Shyamalan was The Village. Next was Signs. And finally, The Sixth Sense. (I was one of those creeped out by the “I see dead people” of the trailer for the latter, and it took several years for me to get over that.) These were enough to solidify Shyamalan as a horror auteur in my mind. I think the other films of his that I’ve watched, The Happening, Knock at the Cabin, have all been horror as well. While some have classified it that way, many consider Unbreakable to be a thriller instead. These two genres are very closely related, in any case, and I’d been wanting to see it.
Unbreakable is a movie to get you thinking. It’s old enough that I’m not going to worry about spoilers here, so be warned. David Dunn, after surviving a train wreck that killed everyone else, runs into Elijah Price, an art dealer and comic book aficionado, who is, literally fragile. A rare disease renders his bones weak and since his childhood love of comic books informed his outlook, he wants to find a hero. Dunn seems to be the man. Never sick in his life, he survived a car crash with no injuries and his only weakness seems to be water (he nearly drowned as a child). Price tries to convince him that he is indeed a superhuman, but his partially estranged wife disagrees. Their son, however, believes. The twist ending has us realize that Price has been conducting terrorist activities in order to find a hero and he “confesses” once he’s certain Dunn is real.
There are definitely some very tense moments in the film. There aren’t any monsters, and Shyamalan wanted this to be known as a comic book hero movie (which it is). He has directed some others in this genre as well, none of which I’ve seen. I watch hero movies now and again, but they often lack the depth of good horror. Unbreakable, however, does have depth. At least it makes you think. Is the good of convincing a hero that he can help people worth the hundreds of deaths it took to find him? Price’s motivation seems pure, but his methods are evil. These kinds of dilemmas are inherently thought-provoking. But I will still probably continue to think of Shyamalan as a horror director. Maybe that’s just wishful thinking.

2 thoughts on “Not Fragile”