I Think, Therefore I Believe

This week in Time, an article by Jeffrey Kluger explores the intelligence of animals. Quite apart from many examples of how bonobos can string together relatively complex concepts using symbol cards (thus evidencing more intelligence than New Jersey’s current governor), the article demonstrates that many animal species display what we would recognize in other humans as intelligence. The article then develops the corollary that if animals think then perhaps they sense emotion as well. Having raised my daughter on Kratt’s Creatures and Zoboomafoo, none of this was new to me. I may be no scientist, but watching closely how animals behave, it has always been obvious to me that we are more like points on a continuum rather than a “special creation.”

Not to put too fine a point on it, this is what lies behind the human obsession with its non-animal status. As Kluger states, “For many people, the Bible offers the most powerful argument of all. Human being were granted ‘dominion over the beasts of the field,’ and there the discussion can more or less stop.” Unfortunately for our animal companions, the use of the Bible to repress others does not stop at human beings who don’t share your religious views. Many use the Bible as an excuse to do as they please to creatures who demonstrate similar emotional responses to people in similar situations and who, increasingly we realize, also think. Kluger’s article opens with an interview with Kanzi, a bonobo. One of the inevitable conclusions is that this great ape is able to think ahead and make plans. Evolution on this point has apparently skipped many Neo-Cons.

For years I have been telling my students that animals display behaviors that we label as “religious” in humans. The difference is that we are able to ask other humans what they are thinking and thereby gain somewhat direct access to their thought process (if they are telling the truth). Because we fail to share language with animals, we assume we are superior thinkers. To me this does not stand to reason. Animals are as fully members of this planet as humans are. Our desire to exploit them is more a reflection of human dominionist tendencies than a reflection of their lack of intelligence. We may even have animals to thank for the basic tenets of religious thought since religions are better described as evolved than revealed.

Maybe not the best sign of animal intelligence, but consider the Neo-Cons...

6 thoughts on “I Think, Therefore I Believe

  1. Henk van der Gaast

    Religious? Please rehash iron man. I’ve lived through 4 teenagers now. All of them think they are indestructible.

    Maybe, just maybe… folk think they are right. Add that to risk taking behaviour. Maybe be we are just a little better at being teenagers and, regardless, our formative years carry a lot further than we would ever like to admit.

    How could I ever have become a conservative socialist technocrat? The politics of Australian socialism (left and right) certainly influenced me. Its a period and a place.

    My teenagers have those and all the teenagers that I have had a share-sphere with reflect their input.

    Maybe a Juggalo-neocon influence?

    Like

  2. (1) Other critters exploit us to no end — all sorts of bacteria and viruses. Heck, chickens have exploited us. They got us to spread their genome far and wide.

    (2) Wasn’t there a recent (1 year) article about gorillas displaying religious behavior — pausing for silence during strolls, or something like that?

    Like

    • Steve Wiggins

      True, Sabio, other critters exploit us. Ironically, the ones that seem to do the most damage are the ones with just functional brains or critters lacking brains altogether. I suspect that at some point having a brain equates to being conscious. Being conscious should (problematic word) lead to ethical treatment. I don’t mind being exploited by chickens!

      Was the gorilla illustration something I wrote about? I seemed to have missed the article.

      Like

  3. The Producer

    This is just another example of the mounting evidence that other animals have greater cognitive abilities, more nuanced moral senses, and richer emotional lives than we once thought.

    But, what is it that most people actually believe? To what extent is human abuse and exploitation of animals based on ignorance and to what extent is it based on prejudice?

    I suspect that in addition to the biblical notion of dominion there are quite a few people that hold to some form of Descartes’ view that animals are merely complex automata. There are probably also many hypocrites who are aware of the evidence, but find it too inconvenient or too radical to internalize.

    Like

Leave a reply to The Producer Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.