Demo C. Rats

I just finished China Miéville’s novel King Rat. I’ve been thinking a lot about rats lately. This retelling of the tale of the Pied Piper of Hamelin has a strong Marxist flavor that intrigues the reader into greater possibilities. Each week as I drive the many miles required as a professional adjunct, I think about the bourgeoisie of academia. Many university programs are simply not possible without the many adjuncts willing to be exploited in order to keep them going. While the adjunct is kept below a certain number of courses so that costly benefits do not need to be paid, full-time faculty are kept below a certain number of courses so that they are free to build the university superstructure. Some teach no courses, do no research, and conduct no administration. It is a fair guess whether they even bother to breathe or not. Yet they are paid full salaries and benefits. Academic fossils paid simply to exist.

Saul, the rat-man who would be king, has a conscience. He was raised by his human father to appreciate the sense of what Karl Marx wrote. As the novel progresses, the rats congregate around him, wanting him to be their king. I have been an adjunct instructor for five years now. As I have watched my prospects grow slimmer, my work load has increased for less and less payback. I frequently chat with full-time colleagues who appreciate everything I’m doing. This academic year I am scheduled to teach eleven courses, strictly part-time, of course. Otherwise someone might have to pay benefits. This week one of the schools I teach at actually expanded parking privileges for adjuncts. Not to be nice, but because they had to.

Saul, the would-be king. So biblical. So human. At the end of the story he lives up to his idealism, granting rats autonomy without being sure how it will play out in the real world. There was a time when academics were idealists. Universities are now, like all other aspects of “modern life,” businesses. I’m sure that full-time instructors devote very little thought to those who work for table-scraps to support the system that underwrites their comfortable lifestyles. Certainly a university president or dean would loose nary a wink of sleep over those who’ve given themselves over to the task of Atlas, holding up their sky. It is business as usual. And as the bourgeoisie know, every aspect of life is business. What happens when the rats go free? The end of the story has not yet been written.

2 thoughts on “Demo C. Rats

  1. There is still a further distinction between tenure track and NTT. I have a colleague who describes our department as a “department of adjuncts,” since none of us is tenure track, we all have one-year contracts, and we are not eligible for most in-house grant money.

    That being said, Temple has benefits even for its adjuncts, and my department is usually hiring.

    Like

  2. Henk van der Gaast

    There is a whole world of A-Prof’s that the real world doesn’t know about.

    There is the classic case of the A-Profs who immediately lose their A’s so their letter heads get even better in the course of an hour. The A-Prof comparator (What’s an Associate? I Have an adjunct!) and of course the A-Prof by proxy (How did you get an A-Prof? I am your boss!).

    I went through a very cynical stage about 15 years ago after I found out that some PhD’s and DSc’s could also be “coerced” from learning institutions.

    Reverse pyramidalism has its place too it seems.

    Your initial comments are correct about adjuncts etc. Institutions may be awarding this lofty title with expectation. Many of the A-Pro’s I have met are red hot and do contribute.

    Like

Leave a reply to Henk van der Gaast Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.