Paradise Re-Lost

It is through the astute eye of my colleague Deane Galbraith that I came to know of my most recent reading project, Paradise Lust: Searching for the Garden of Eden by Brook Wilensky-Lanford. BWL (since the author’s name is a mouthful and since it took me four hours to get home tonight (at a distance of less than 30 miles) I’ll abbreviate her title. Being a fellow New Jerseyan, I’m sure BWL will understand) surveys various attempts that have been made over the past century-and-change to try to locate the Garden of Eden. Spurred on by the discovery that her own educated, rational great-uncle had also wondered about the mythical location of our mythical ancestors, she sketches various attempts to find Eden. Tracing a course that often crosses paths with my own academic background, BWL notes the pervasive—one might say undying—belief that once upon a time in a land far away there was a garden paradise.

Quite apart from the obviously folkloristic, and Mesopotamian, origin of the creation story, BWL demonstrates that the unifying factor behind the search for Eden is the four rivers mentioned in Genesis. The Tigris and Euphrates should be no-brainers, and no-brainer is a word that frequently comes to mind when otherwise intelligent people sincerely suggest Eden lies beneath the North Pole, or in Ohio, or Florida. Clearly this story left only psychological traces on the impressionable. Far more mysterious are the Pishon and the Gihon. The fact that these rivers have never been found (never existed) has fueled the economy of adventurers and bibliophiles for well over a century. The fact that people buy BWL’s book underscores the point. The end result is that any confluence of four rivers could potentially be Eden. What is lost is the biblical worldview.

The four rivers of Genesis 2 flow to the four points of the compass to water the entire earth since all ancient people seemed to have believed they lived in the middle of everything. The Genesis writer takes for granted that we’ve heard of them, and who, among the sophisticated, wants to admit otherwise? Since the story never happened, no physical evidence should be expected. And that’s what all of BWL’s explorers find. Nothing. Of course, if you want to run for President you’d better claim to believe in Eden, for plenty of Americans, despite our educational system, do. Many an ape is wiser. So if you want to find Eden, locate the center of the world. Given the traffic tonight, it surely must be New York City. If you’re going to look for it, you’ll want to take a book to read while the rivers of cars stop flowing. I’d suggest Brook Wilensky-Lanford’s Paradise Lust.

6 thoughts on “Paradise Re-Lost

  1. Henk v in the "bat cave"

    Two comments in two days…

    For me;
    a) The eden of genesis is clearly part of the establishment literature of the folk retold from a number of sources..The mesopotamian gilgamesh epic alludes to the region outside the cultivated areas as Eden (and no, its a hard day with Christopher dying, I am not going to look it all up again). Given that the entire Pentateuch is establishment of a creation deity, El and Yahweh with his Rat pack. Yahweh’s association with Israel AFTER Judah being the prize tribe, its clear that Judah is the foremost tribe, Samaria was damned Israel’s land but (horrendously) aren’t Israelites. The “returnees” are clearly establishing them selves in an opposite manner to Samarians. the mythologies of the 5th and 4th centuries are drawn on prior facts lost in legend. I am still wondering if there ever was an established Judah outside the persian terminology of the 5th century.

    b) The eden of tyre from Ezekiel than becomes alliteration (what isnt at this point).

    Genesis is clearly just a point of polemic as Ezrah’s anti semitic polemic juxtaposes that within Ruth (the best foot fetish story i have threshed!). Genetics proves otherwise. To be anti semitic is to be anti everyone from the region of “syria” south. Nineveh’s trees be damned..(note the same repetition elsewhere in OT and NT)

    Sorry to all that do not get the gist of establishment literature and polemic, its just the best that has ever been written and the best with its own self refutation.of separate mythological polemics.

    No wonder we all love it.

    Bringing up St George and the dragon is a prime example of variation on a single theme. I think that is the oldest and the longest running of all establishment themes… I’ll ask my mother in law, Tiamat.

    Please all, raise a bottle of whiskey and consume a carton of cigarettes. We all sing better when abused. My teacher of late, has died. Long may he be remembered!

    and yes, we can all invent beautiful polemic!

    Like

    • Steve Wiggins

      Great of you to stop in BWL! I saw that our mutual friend Charles Haberl was listed in your acknowledgments–you’ll never go far wrong consulting him! Keep up the good work; it is a great book!

      Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.