Rereading books takes time. When I was a professor my reading time was largely limited to the summer and winter breaks. Those who haven’t experienced the academic lifestyle firsthand may not realize just how incredibly busy you are during term time. Class prep, grading, delivering lectures, leading seminars, committee meetings, office hours—it really is much more than a nine-to-five job. Time to sit down and read through books is limited, and since those books are heady, academic tomes, they take considerable time. (I’m reading an academic book at the moment and I can only get through a finger-full of pages at a sitting.) All of this means I’m generally reluctant to reread books. Not that I’m a traditional academic anymore, but because I have a huge and growing stack of books I haven’t read yet.
Nevertheless, a project on which I’m working required rereading Gerald Brittle’s The Demonologist. I read this about two years ago, while commuting. The thing about reading on a bus is that the quality of reading time is strained. Recall isn’t the same as when you’re in a comfy, stationary chair, and no stranger’s head is lopping onto your shoulder as they doze. (Yes, that happens, and frequently for those of us on the first bus of the day.) In any case, my copy of this book doesn’t have an index and I couldn’t remember if some specific instances were discussed. The only thing for it, then, was to read it again. My second reading was done with more skepticism than I could conjure on a bus ride, but still my original sense remains: we willfully cut out much of human experience if we stop our ears completely. At least in principle.
Ed and Lorraine Warren were self-taught ghost-hunters. More often than not, their cases turned into what they believed were demonic cases. Since academics tend not to publish much about such things, the self-taught are pretty much free to declare themselves experts—just switch on reality TV and check me on this. Experts are those with experience who are willing to share it. The other day I met someone who, like me, used to live the commuting life. We both agreed that telecommuting was a more authentic way to exist—your otherwise mandated three or four daily hours traveling can be more sanely used at home. Still, we had to agree, bus time could be used for activities like reading, and once you stop commuting you have to carve time out for it. In such a situation rereading a book is at times necessary. When I was a professor, I reread frequently. But then, it was mostly articles or books that I wouldn’t take on in their entirety. In the reading life there’s never enough time.